 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Not all coins are worth buying because of their value ,the best altcoins to buy are the top twenty in the rank of coin index in the digital market but most of all the bitcoin is still the best to buy or invest.
Are we not speculating on real-world-value? Are not the propositions of low-ranked coins to be considered? (ie. recent ICO propositions, low in rank...) |
|
|
|
|
Is BlockChain Tech currently being embraced by Govs?... Yes.
Undeniable, beneficial future tech, regarding economic monetary cost terms.
All the best brains have migrated into this space.
Yet I see the fragility of market movement, due to outside sentiment, which, IMO, is currently facing this market, and not fully understanding, yet now conceding to the fact, that this is where the future is heading... IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
If considering an Escrow service, which 'OldSkool' operator/s would you consider?
Pointers to long-term established?...
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. If I where to be critical of the pricing structure and current market, (ie, many more coming into market, with AI etc...), Would it not be better to focus on 'features', and not 'monetary balance'? As, may I suggest, anyone with $100000+, may consider other platforms, AI etc..?
'Unlocking' of features.
Allow someone to purchase your product, fully working, at a good market, fixed price, with limitations. When happy with product, wishes to pay to unlock additional features to benefit from. Thus, creates a large userbase, and the maintaining of.
A one-off payment for a limited product, with full unlock potential.
This a very competitive market now, and to only allow initial access with a monthly payment, may cloud company in the crowd IMO.
Basically, to appease all, release a fully working, restricted feature product at a good market, fixed price. Allowing all to participate, and grow, paying to unlock additional features, thus maintaining a strong usergroup, and easy access to intro newcomers...
(IE as people, who like product, can enter into, and once gains made, will happily pay for additional features..)
Only my initial view, would appreciate opinions to the contrary...
|
|
|
|
|
Really liking the design. One suggestion, regarding Multichart view, and multiple monitors.
May help if have the coin pairs in large letters, so can easily distinguish from one chart to the next. Maybe top left of the chart in large letters. Indicators on Multicharts would also be a benefit. Also, if where easy enough to implement, to be able to expand the current number of charts restriction (50?), would be nice, as many traders have a few monitors capable of displaying more.
Any indication as to new pricing and structure?
|
|
|
|
|
The current version works with OSX 10.11, but not 10.9.5.
Is there a working version for 10.9.5? What are minimum system requirements?
|
|
|
|
|
This is what I'm getting grasp of. If belief in initial, seeing how news can affect, yet rebound, IMO, Initial fundamental is stronger than any other that may try to affect. Future growth away from others' control. IMO.
(Thank you Sat).
|
|
|
|
Lots of people (also investers) seem to have no faith when a correction taking place. Correction is normal, as it climbs so fast, people should get more faith in the top 10 coins and stop dumping when they get scared.
This is no correction, this is the news regarding CoinBase. Get real. Same as China FUD, Fork etc... EDIT: Situation has passed. Correction, and uptrend seen, yet issue of CoinBase IMO, something to be considered affecting, maybe for a while?... CoinBase issue IMO caused the 2k drop. But we also needed a correction right? CoinBase > IRS was bad news, but perpaps in the end tax regulation for crypto will contribute to the steady future for digital coins. Who is we? BTC is of its' own. News affects. Yet IMO, Initial idea prevails... |
|
|
|
Lots of people (also investers) seem to have no faith when a correction taking place. Correction is normal, as it climbs so fast, people should get more faith in the top 10 coins and stop dumping when they get scared.
This is no correction, this is the news regarding CoinBase. Get real. Same as China FUD, Fork etc... EDIT: Situation has passed. Correction, and uptrend seen, yet issue of CoinBase IMO, something to be considered affecting, maybe for a while?... CoinBase issue IMO caused the 2k drop. |
|
|
|
Don't get nervous. Some altcoins always follow BTC, which is up again. I keep now my BTC and alts. Seem to generate good passive income.
Of course, if believe, HODL! The artificial drop (IMO) across board, to the minute, is not reflective of peoples' actual actions at time. Individual coins' value is being over-seen, and controlled, IMO. EDIT: For a price drop across the board (CoinMarketCap), the answer to my question, is that BTC directly, and IMO should not have, direct influence as to the real-world value of another coin/ project. Full Stop. Remove the BTC own issues, IMO, to not allow to affect others' progress... |
|
|
|
Seems like the entire market is directly related to Bitcoin.. Doesn't suprise me, as it has been like this for the entire existence of cryptos, but in the near future i think some coins will decouple for Bitcoin and be able to trade on their own without being affected by other coins' price swings.
Is this where I come for someone to present my post in a better manor? |
|
|
|
At the present, every altcoin derive it's value from bitcoin. When people talk about cryptocurrency they are not talking about altcoin or worse still airdrop, they refer to bitcoin as cryptocurrency hence all other altcoin is affected to whatever affect bitcoin that may change in future though!
As present, the altcoins are depended on bitcoins. like if you want to get cash, you need to convert alts into bitcoins and then from bitcoin you can exchange it for Cash. I dont think any payment methods directly converts alts into local Fiat. Also Bitcoins is used as mode of payment plus as a currency to trade but none of the alt is used as a mode of payment and they are used only for trading purpose. That's why the increase and decrease of bitcoin price directly impacts the altcoin prices. So, essentially, all Alts are slave to BTC? Is it not that now, the real-world benefit, Hi-Tech talent in this space, value of coin, should not be artificially affected, due to another coins' issues?... Govs know, BlockChain is future. For project development to be directly affected due to external issues (ie BitCoin Issues), IMO, needs to be removed. Remove the middle... ie Alts directly have no blockage regarding Fiat. IMO. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin, and Ethereum offline address/ key generators.
As they obviously are not live connected to the BlockChain, how is it they can generate an address/ key, that will be unique, and not conflict with what is already on the BlockChain?
EDIT: Excuse double post, not allowing delete.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin, and Ethereum offline address/ key generators.
As they obviously are not live connected to the BlockChain, how is it they can generate an address/ key, that will be unique, and not conflict with what is already on the BlockChain?
EDIT: Excuse double post, not allowing delete.
|
|
|
|
|
Alts are priced due to market price considered value. BTC is paired, so is ETH, USDT. If ETH plummets, do all alts?. No.BTC value is with Fiat.
Should we now have a time where alts, ie high-tech companies should be placed directly to fiat, for real world value? And not allowing BTC to be an interim? (MiddleMan?!)...
EDIT: Time for Alts to have direct access IMO, for what whole ethos being, remove middleman, having to rely on something blocking direct access... Blindingly obvious, IMO...
And Edit again: Is it not that Bitcoin is in no ones control, yet only placed in position? Would it not be in all exchanges benefit, regarding liquidity, to remove the middleman, ie bitcoin etc.., to place a different model, whereby all alts etc, all coins, free to move trade, etc.. without limitations?... Have I just placed the future vision of what will be? LOL...(Dare to Imagine what would be best for all...).
|
|
|
|
|
All reasons aside, I have now witnessed more than once, BTC drop, bewildering me as to the direct, to the minute drop, across the board of alts, only escape, to fiat etc... please refer to my previous post which directly concerns my observation. It happens almost to the minute, full stop. Unnatural IMO.
Obviously, in long run, things even out, yet I am addressing a phenomenon that I have witnessed more than once. Is concerning, and not one that can be explained with reasoning of considered reasonable causes, IMO...
|
|
|
|
|
China FUD, Fork, 10k psych,
I am witnessing, IMO, an unnatural drop across board, to the minute, when BTC drops.
Please explain to me why all others drop in value directly due to BTC value, to the minute...
|
|
|
|
|
If not HODLer, what do you choose to exit from BTC?
Fiat?
Tether?
Ripple?
Dash?
Current day coin positive uptrend?
How do you exit and stand on side line, to then re-enter?...
|
|
|
|
|
Am I right in thinking that miner influence overseeded general use?
One thing I am certain of, is that, as mainstream come in, ridiculous fees demanded, will not last for long, IMO.
Without knowing the ins and outs, main stream usage is the number one focus for all involved, IMO...
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, to withdraw BTC from majority exchanges is 0.001 BTC, current rate $9.68.
For any service charging under $9.68, you are paying over double the amount to receive the service.
Miner fees have now become ridiculous IMO, BTC no longer a viable option for regular payments.
Discuss...
|
|
|
|
|
