Hypra is a sleeping giant. Good time to stack at this level.

I think rebranding is necessary for this project.  We need to remove doge from name.  It sounds like just a meme coin which is completely different than what the project is.

coming back to bitcointalk after a long time and the first thread is this one. following

Task report:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PieXIOlBvOQ7aX1bB27Io6h6Ik4DbgnM1BXOX-qz5ow/edit#gid=1465014310

yet another dead project.. Team just disappeared after ICO..

Now we can confirm that this project died at ICO stage, and now its time for returning the money back that was raised on ICO stage.  I would like to hear from team regarding returning the investor money back.  This is a failed project and the team should return the money back. 

but sadly, recently like many other coins, this coin also came under radar of P&D groups, just check chart of 15th Aug and 4th Aug in poloniex, it fluctuated more than 50% in matter of 15 mins.

As we are seeing some bullish movements with ETFs and things, Bitcoin dominance is also rising to its 2018 high to 46.70% with alts are bleeding badly with reference from coinmarketcap.  How much do you think BTC dominance at a peak in this bull run before alts starts their own bull run.  As we have witnessed BTC dominance slid to 64.79% in Dec 2017 bull run from early 2017 where it was as high as 87%.  If we take these two peak points into consideration, in my opinion, this time BTC dominance will be around 53% (55% max) in peak before alts takes momentum.  What are your thoughts guys?

I am saying of the complete product since it has been so long the project started and the talk to the project is pretty much absent in the market. 


ya.. that is the negative aspect.  First-mover doesn't always win.  Others have the idea and with advanced technology, others can come up with more advanced product.


Ya. NMC has advantage over other project in this prospect.  The other serious competitor is Blockstack.  I am not such a tech guy to understand small details on the project, but it has late-mover advantage.

wow... what a great statement to introduce yourself what you are.  I am laughing thinking what might be your baboy facial expression writing this post, big red eyes with anger with nostril flared up and grinding the teeth.. ha ha.. you're a hell lot of funny guy to post in this thread.  oops.. you have already earn merit point too... **suspicious**

I myself is also a HODLer of NMC which I bought about a year ago when I first stepped into cryptocurrency learning that NMC is second coin after bitcoin and it has crashed more  than 75% from ATH.  I bought it without any knowledge about project back then.  Now, about a year later I found that coin still in same place and after my some research, it is because lack of mass acceptance as well as people are not interested in these type of projects right now.  It seems they have also failed to deliver.  I may be wrong and the team is working hard behind to deliver something big in the right time once demand for decentralized DNS arises, but right now, its a speculation that something good is coming.  If team able to deliver in right time, it will certainly be a big multiplier of the investment.  I will continue to HODL this because this is my one of the initial coins I bought after bitcoin.

You may not be a DT member but you've got that intelligence to outweigh some people in that position, I appreciate.  I would not say "outweigh that position" because that position is respectable and we should respect that position.

I have honestly admitted in public that it was mistake asking for merit.  Now I have to admit myself as a "spammer" too..  If admitting my mistake and also apologizing for asking merit is not enough and also should admit myself as a spammer too then I will never learn this lesson.  My intention here is not spamming and to forcefully admit what I am not is "crime to self".  I would rather accept more negative trusts than to admit myself as spammer.... cheers..  

This thing confused me.  Don't know which one of you is true.  



I have honestly admit with public thread that it was mistake asking for merit.  Now you are saying I have to admit myself as a "spammer" too??  Okay, what it feels you I have learned my lesson?  If it was admitting my mistake and apologizing for asking merit is not enough and should also admit myself as a spammer too then I will never learn this lesson because my intention here is not spamming and to forcefully admit what you are not is "crime to self".  I would rather accept more negative trusts than to admit myself as spammer.... cheers.. have a nice weekend

Thanks for clarifying me with my concern, I appreciate your time.


I have asked for merit and its my mistake.  So, it makes me untrustworthy?  I have been punished for this and wearing this red tag of negative trust as scammer for a week now.  I apologize for that mistake, but didn't I deserve my trust to be neutralized?


Thanks you are glad for me admitting my mistake, but isn't my punishment be reversed also?  Is it fair me admitting my mistakes again and again and my punishment not be reversed?  And yes I want to move on, but this red tag following me in my every post tells me I am a scammer.  New members may make these kind of mistake, but for that one mistake I have to wear this red tag for rest of my life in BT?  It has been a week now.

I have been constantly seeing this CKUSD coin doing high volumes.  Sometimes, it is in top 10 for 24-hr trade volume.  Today also, it is in top 15 with 140 mil dollar volume without listed in well-known big exchanges.  Is it some kind of stablecoin? Is it trustworthy? or is it alternative to USDT?

I agree its a serious project but I think its just not a right time for its demand.  There are many examples good projects died after it failed to make its presence in market.  People are most attractive to lucrative infrastructure projects with high TPS these days.  Most people agree that first we need to establish a good infrastructure to build dApps and other projects on it.  I think many projects will come up with its own in-built security system too.  So, it is not clear at the moment in the future how much demand NMC will have.  Even the demand arise, it will have to face tough competition with similar projects such as Blockstack.  The most important thing is that there is very low marketing for the project and it has been in dark for a long time and many people have forgotten its presence.  So, I think the first step is let world know its existence with marketing such as bounty program or competition of its kind, its not surprising that so many projects spending so much money on bounties.  And also re-launch the attractive website.  Website does not affect the quality of project but it does effect mindset of investors.  People nowadays had a habit of lucrative sleek website in crypto, so many would not learn further after they see html type simple website.  Every dog has its day, but for that day we need to stay fit to hit on, otherwise we will miss the chance.


It is a different demand level of Litecoin than Namecoin.  Litecoin is more valuable these days because since bitcoin is mostly seen as "store of value" rather than currency because of slow transaction and high fees, Litecoin came as good substitute for bitcoin to work as currency because of fast transactions and very nominal fees.  And also Litecoin has huge community behind it which is making a feel of presence in market and thus increasing its value and its founder, Charlie Lee, is always on limelight and quite well-known figure in cryptoworld which Namecoin lacks.

I hope devs of namecoin will realize the importance of marketing and make its presence in the market, make new website, and re-launch the project may be with new name.  It can re-vitalize the project.

Recently, I got negative trust for asking for merit, which I admit my mistake and apologized in DM as well as publicly in forum and still waiting for trust neutralization.  Going through this, I came to know negative trust only be reversed by the giver and no one else could even admins.  There, one concern made me scare that what happens if DT account got hacked and just went on negative trust and merit distribution spree.  Is that also irreversible?  If that happens not only account holder lose his/her account but it can also negatively effect in reputation of many other accounts.  Since it is irreversible by any other means, what will they do?

I think NMC came very early before it has to and wasted so many years without proving its usefulness.  First, are people seriously thinking of decentralized DNS now? I may be wrong but "not really".  The most attractive projects right now are Infrastructure projects and solving the pain point of it and where the large sum of money is going too.  We will see battle between big infrastructure project for quite sometime.  After successful establishment of infrastructure project, people will then turn to building dApps.  Just like after road system was built, people will then invest in vehicles, then only we need automated traffic lights instead of human traffic officers, just like, when people experience security problems regarding DNS hacking, etc, and there is a need for better security layer, then there will be the demand for it, but unfortunately, until that time, there will be other better alternatives or at least serious competitors to NMC.  Right now, the most sought-after security projects are projects related with security of crypto-assets.

The reason behind it being undervalued are:
1.  Project came very early and spent many years without being highlighted in mainstream.
2.  Low marketing.
3.  Not quite attractive website.
4.  Small and quite inactive community.
5.  There are many other mouthwatering lucrative projects to invest.
6.  Except Poloniex, no other big exchanges (but still volume of NMC on poloniex is quite low).
7.  Quite an old coin and many have long forgotten its existence.

So, my final verdict is NMC may do well and pumped hard with bull run, but in the long term, I am "not attractive" on this.  I may consider this when there will be much demand and how it will do against its competitors which I think is long ahead.

Others may have better opinions than me and may have better reasons that it is better to invest, I will appreciate those.  This is just my personal opinion and I appreciate different peoples have different opinions.

That's why experts says SELL when others are greedy and BUY others are fearful.  Also, you need to adjust your investment strategy according to market condition.  Not many can be exact true about top of high and bottom of the low, some may buy or sell into that exact point by chance and by expertise but otherwise all others cannot figure out the exact top or bottom.