καλά ο τύπος είναι απίστευτος απατεώνας ετσι κι αλλιώς.
εκτός απο τα παραπάνω βγήκε στην επιφάνεια και ότι έχει κάνει πιθανότητα ζαβολιές και στο λεγόμενο PHD του.

ενδεικτικά
https://medium.com/@paintedfrog/craig-wrights-llm-dissertation-is-full-of-plagiarism-f21439ea8a47
https://medium.com/@samwill102244/anatomy-of-a-fraud-a-deep-dive-into-one-of-craig-wrights-plagiarized-papers-96bc8624fc12

η ουσία είναι ότι μιας και έχει ταυτιστεί με το bsv , τους παίρνει χαλαρά και αυτούς στο λαιμό του (αν και μάλλον αυτοί  είναι σε denial state προς το παρόν). 

Υπάρχει μια μελέτη που δείχνει ότι το block το συγκεκριμένο δεν ανήκει σε αυτά που έσκαψε ο satoshi
Επίσης υπήρχαν σίγουρα παραπάνω απο 3 που έσκαβαν εκείνο τον καιρό. Η υλοποίηση του btc είχε αρχίσει να  συζητείτε μερικούς μήνες πριν σε πολλά μέλη της κοινότητας των cyberpunks και σίγουρα μέσα στον εναν μήνα που ήδη κυκλοφορούσε στην πιάτσα το πρόγραμμα , κάποιοι το κατέβασαν και το έτρεχαν τον πρώτο μήνα λειτουργίας του δικτύου.

Η σημασία του να μετακινηθούν τα συγκεκριμένα δεν είναι το ότι είναι μόνο 50 btc , οπότε τι τρέχει στα γύφτικα.
Αν υπήρχε περίπτωση να είναι στα περιβόητα 1 million btc που σύμφωνα με την παραπάνω μελέτη ισως να ανήκουν στον satoshi , μπορει να σημαίνει και αλλα πράγματα πέραν του ότι απλώς ηθελε κάποιος να αγοράσει τσίχλες και χάλασε τα 10 απο τα 50 btc.

προβληματισμοί στο συγκεκριμένο θέμα οπως διατυπωνονται στα διαφορα sites
- το συγκεκριμένο block ανήκει στην λιστα που έδωσε στο δικαστήριο ο fake satoshi , craig, o οποίος ομως δεν μπόρεσε να αποδείξει ότι του ανήκουν στο δικαστήριο.
-κάποιος μπορεί να έσπασε το κλειδί για να αποκτήσει πρόσβαση στο συγκεκριμένο wallet ( το οποίο αφήνει την κερκόπορτα ανοιχτή για την ασφάλεια του όλου συστήματος)
- αν είναι του satoshi, η κίνηση και μόνο δείχνει ότι ανα πάσα στιγμή μπορεί αυτά τα αδρανοποιημένα coins να μπούν στην κυκλοφορία. Μόνο και μόνο να κινηθούν τα συγκεκριμένα, δημιουργεί φόβους για απίστευτες κινήσεις στο οικοσύστημα.  Και σε αυτό το σενάριο  αν κάποιος έχει 1 million btc, πρώτα κάνει μια δοκιμή να κάνει restore το παλιό  wallet που περιέχει 50 btc να δει τουλάχιστον αν μπορεί να τα μετακινήσει.

γενικώς , σε δουλειά να βρισκόμαστε,

I was on saronite and I saw it happened live. While pool had 5-6Mh/s , the network was showing 2kh/s and difficlutly down to 200k or something like that.    blocks almost every second, saw the block height jump by tens once in a while.

I saw the reaction of the guys the last days and I can say they won my trust.
-they found it out quickly
-they said that they will go with rollback and stop mining message to users (ok, that possibly got lost since they posted it as I saw only on twitter)
-they made the patch to fix the issue
and if I understood correctly they also hard forked?

at least my respect for the speed of things happening.
good team
and not a scam coin as you accuse them.

only point worth mentioning is that I saw in the beggining of the coin that reward would be doubled every some time until the second year
and then it seems they changed their mind and now the  rewards will be only decreasing overtime (sounds logical to me)

keep going guys

etn team suggested both nanopool and also electroneum.fairhash.org the last days (along with the spacepools one who stands still)

there might be some private pools that mine but with a lot of luck (that means that they basically find most blocks)
and that also means that the nanoppol is so unlucky these days!!!!!!!!!

suggest nanopool to change their name to luckypool , just in case they revert luck to their favor

from block 307580 to current (308285) it is some 700 blocks
nanopool has succeeded to find some 115

in any case no offense here and i am doing the critism in    good faith.

beyond the problem with the pending transactions , I suppose the difficulty adjustment could be copied from other coin migrations to new algo. It wouldn't hurt.

lept's hope for the best, keep trying to resolve the issues

wouldn't like to be mean, but i have to comment that this show must end one way or another

so many coins changed algo succesfully with minimal issues.
yesterday AEON forked and all went smoothly, at least from what i understand.

can't really think of anything else than a suggestion to ETN team  to hire devs to do the job. It is so obvious that there is incompetence in there.
If ETN want to do something more than to have the luck of a failed coin initiative, then they will need to take action now, still it might already too late.

(little hodler of ETN till the death of the coin)

as it is (the last few days)  , it seems that asics are out of the game.
The metric should be the unknown pool hashpower which just dissapeared.  And this was some 80% of the network. Speechless.

In case of solo mining farms with GPU mining monero out of the known pools, using their own pool, I see no explanation why this hashrates have not been transfered to the new algo at the same way. I mean, if someone has a farm of GPU's mining monero in his own pool , then I would expect that after updating the miner software to continue mine in a same manner, using it's own pool again.
But the fact that unknown pool has just vanished leads to think that it was just asics (and bots?) controlling 80% of the coin. just wow

All the new added hashpower is possibly migrated gpu's from other coins to monero. Things will clear out in the next few days so to find out more.

I would start to worry when I see again the unknown pool hashrate increasing again.
It would be also interesting to make an exercise to check the  percentage of the unknown pool factor in other coins. This will show the real status of the industry.

is this supposed to be a spam post? why don't you post it at alt coins sections

monero is still there, at least what I see  at https://www.baikalminer.com/product12.php

ok thanks
it seems things are back to normal.

there  must be something wrong with the network figures in the pool (http://pool.brazukcoin.org/)
the block found figures in minutes , just don't add up, along with the figures for network hash rate and difficulty
it is not possible for the network to report last block found one hour and the pool to say 30 minutes
 
what am i missing? is it supposed to be like that?
network figures seem to be out of sync completely

it might be called "washing money"
or some need to justify how they had money in their accounts though the years

-yes, i own 5 , 4 liquid and one 56 nitro
-regarding the saphire, only the nitro edition requires 3 8 pins connectors, the rest work with just 2
-even the nitro one, doesn't have a problem since you just need again 2 cables so not a big deal (for the third connection you can use one of the 2 cables  used anyway)
-regarding the performance, the liquid as said above, need a bit more power , but you could get over 2k on xmr easily with low temps, so might the card live a bit longer
-due to 56 being able to reach easily 1950-1980 , right now I would go all the way with the cheapest option that happen to be 56.
-other than price  just choose  any vendor since scarcity of vega doesn't leave enough room for vendor choice

Which place are you located at?

As far as I can see there is a big shortage of vega's , at least in europe
At this point of time whatever version of vega is just not there,
so if I was you and i wanted badly a vega, then I would grab whatever brand is available.

from price perspective I would go for 56 at first , then 64 and the most expensive the liquid ones.

nice hypothesis...
it might be also someone that is not in this world anymore and passed away
and that by accident a person with the  name in question was living just few blocks away in a small town in US
and also by accident this guy was the first real word person to join the project that was created by satoshi  in sourceforge
and most likely it was not just one person but rather a group of 2 or more people involved
but it doesn't matter who really is, since his/theirs creation made something big already

and many people say that he can't be him or the other known suspect guy, since they were asked and they denied it. Who the hell can accept that he was the creator after all that fuzz that has  happened since then?

Have noticed this behaviour on mine one.s  only when I tried to run gpu-z utility while mining
But have read many users have this problem for uncertain  reason

One possible workaround is the one provided on vega. Miningguides .com site
At the section with title "vega hash drop",where there is a script that can monitor hash rate and if the drop exceeds a certain level defined by you it automatically restarts everything. Not solving the root cause, but is better than nothing

possibly on 2 seperate rigs?

just to add one more experience with vegas if it adds on free wisdom subject

decided to build a 6 vega rig (my first one ever). knew btc from 2013, looked again at 2014-2015 and din't do anything.  i just decided to give it a try just to not regret it again for not doing something, even if i am very late  in this and I know  what i am messing with.
ordered 6 vega 64 (2  liquid from saphire and 4 gigabyte watercooled) late november-early december at amazon at 599 uk Pounds.
the last 2 gigabyte delivered mid and end december. The last 2 are to be return back to Amazon as not working ones. (problematic ones- the one crashes the system as hard as you try and the second is not recognized by windows as a gpu anymore-worked a bit in the beggining and then was lost completely-not recognized as hw anymore. tried also on second motherboard, another rig of a friend with same behaviour.)

So have spent almost a month with setup of the rig with the 4 cards (mobo Asrock btc pro r2.0, 2 *evga 1000 PSU  , win 10 pro etc). Followed steps from various sites (vega.miningguides covers most of it), installed drivers numerous times and windows from scratch 2 times to make it stable-my first ever rig, so newbie completely. had many years to deal with pc equipment). currently run a bat file to disable/enable cards, set settings by overdrivetool and run the miner of  choice.
Have a stable system now , system doesn't need reboot , runs stable for almost a week now  -will let it run to see if it crashes sometime.
(not optimum setup though, 250-255W per card , mem 1100, tp -30% and fan speed at some 2k are all the changes i have done, with overdriventool , no registry files used so far, might try changes when add a  5th nitro saphire i will get the following days)
mainly use xmrstak for etn, sumo, monero with good results. Have also tried nicehash , working  perfect on cryptonight, just can't find a reason to leave the coins to someone else.
pulling some 2010-2040 hash/sec per card  constantly. temps at 45-46 (watman readings, not using this anymore other than that) . Rarely using 2 other utilites ie GPU-z to read gpu settings like temp etc due that it affects hash power everytime i use them, so need to disable/enable the cards again.

due to the failures of the last 2 cards , i don't really want to push the remaining ones hard or to do many changes to the setup.
looking to add 2 more vega (if found anyway- i stopped asking for a replacement from amazon due to last 2 failures-not sure if i should question gigabyte reliability, or vega in general-since the last 2 cards were failures the only thing i can assume is that the cards came from returns from other customers and they were problematic from start-shame that they send them to customers)

initial target of the mining effort was  to see if a system with 6 vegas 64   can give 20 euros per day recurring revenue (on average-low set target and a ROI of some 6-8+ months).  
after less than a month ,monthly target has met . I meet the target with just 4 cards and not 6. With some lack on sumo, have some 0,1 btc (0,75 btc , along with some monero and   etn  )
For as long as it lasts, and if the whole industry doesn't collapse overnight, i am pretty sure that mining can work.
Also as a thought, i am leaning towards the high end (either vega or 1080ti) with a reasoning that even in the worst case scenario of downward trend, if there are any cards left producing even minimal revenue, these will be the top ones currently (ROI will be in red on this scenario but anyway).

Thinking seriously to build a second rig but on 1070 or 1080ti, seem to have better availability and also to diversify the mining  to other coins also.

I would say potential millionaires

recognition is earned upon safe exit.

this guy on video and his words don't quite fit whoever person(s) wrote the paper some 9 years ago
the hidden satoshi had an ideology behind all this (don't judge it good or bad).

this clown is so arrogant and being a market-corporate guy. It is all about the money and the markets.
pathetic at least

does in 2:27 refers also to Nick? heard something like this, not sure