 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Helloi I am under ubuntu 16.04 with cuda 9.2 Downloaded and run the latest version (803) but is giving an error: $ sudo bash runlyra.sh
./CryptoDredge: error while loading shared libraries: libcares.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
': not a valid identifier `continueKey Do you know what can I do? Installing libc-ares2 package is as easy as running the following command on terminal: sudo apt-get install libc-ares2Thank you very much, now it works. |
|
|
|
Helloi I am under ubuntu 16.04 with cuda 9.2 Downloaded and run the latest version (803) but is giving an error: $ sudo bash runlyra.sh
./CryptoDredge: error while loading shared libraries: libcares.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
': not a valid identifier `continueKey Do you know what can I do? |
|
|
|
|
I dont know if this is the right place to ask about software problems but I am having a weird issue with 2.0.1.5.
It was working fine for several days but since yesterday, the excavator server window is repeately closing and running again, after one or a few shares, window closes and opens again and this repeats endlessly.
Tried installing nicehash, rebenchmark, reinstall nvidia drivers... no way.
Any ideas? other miners (ewbf, ccminer zm, etc...) are working fine, just nicehash..
|
|
|
|
Waiting for people talk with real numbers, then  It would be great if people can report actual profits (preferably USD) along with sol or mh values. I am mining zcash@flypool at the moment and with 6300 sol, I am getting about 0.11 zcash/day (about 50usd/day).
with that hasrate i would be mining bitcoingold!!!!! way more profitable than zcash So true. Tons of more profitable coins to mine over zcash. |
|
|
|
I've tested both BTG on Supernova and ZEC on Flypool. I am making way more with ZEC than BTG. Flypool dominates ZEC, whereas BTG doesn't appear to be finding as many blocks to make that actual revenue I see on a 24-hour basis top ZEC or even come close to WhatToMine estimates.
I did roughly $60/day on ZEC and $45/day on BTG. In the last 24 hours, Supernova found 51 blocks of BTG and Flypool found 240 blocks of ZEC.
Plus, I believe in ZEC long-term more than BTG so there's even more incentive to mine it. Using WhatToMine is only good for broad estimates. Your real revenue is still based on the performance of the pool you are mining with.
Very nice info, great to compare with other good-looking coins. Any body else? |
|
|
|
With a price of about $ 700, the etherium regained its leading position in the mining.
700 in a month or ? |
|
|
|
|
It would be great if people can report actual profits (preferably USD) along with sol or mh values. I am mining zcash@flypool at the moment and with 6300 sol, I am getting about 0.11 zcash/day (about 50usd/day).
|
|
|
|
|
I am monitoring the zpool stats for a while and according 24hour actual results, equihash algo is at third row, followed by neoscrypt and decred is at around 10th row, at the time of writing.
On the other hand, awesome miner displays highest profit on decred (over 6USD/Kh/day) all day long, and chooses this one for mining.
Can someone explain me why its happening this way? equihash algo appears most profitable (for a long time), when we look to actual 24hr numbers, but its never selected and revenue/profit of equihash consistently stays at 3USD, at "online services" tab, for several days.
I am currently mining zcash outside of AWM, and easily getting around more then 6usd/Kh/day for more then 24 hr, while awesome miner consistently selects other algos.
Do anyone have an explanation why its happening this way?
|
|
|
|
No youre reading it correct but, I was considering it under single-pool scenario. What I am observing is, sometimes, marginal gain values are not quite correct in terms of gaining the actual profit. Therefore, It would be good to eliminate such marginal levels and stick to average monthly values for the given rig, depending on former performance of it. Thats why I ask for such a rule feature. If it detects overrated-underrated profit, I expect it to switch to the next good coin in the list, of course, after 30min or what ever adjusted. Hi all, and thanks for the answers, they were certainly useful. I have some further questions.
I am looking for utilization of rules feature but it appears its not possible to create a rule that can assess "per month" gain and apply profile switching (in fact, algorithm switching). Can any of you manage to apply such a rule? Basically, I want to make a switch if monthly gain under "Miners" tab is under or over certain numbers.
I think this would be very difficult for a rule to do... even if such a trigger was available. The exchange rate of BTC fluctuates constantly, and AM is just displaying the current value of your coin as reported by Whattomine or the online services. If the price of BTC tanks below your threshold, then you would trigger a different pool, when maybe your coin wasn't affected by BTC/USD exchange rate. If you really wanted this action, then you might be able to program it via the C#/API interfaces in AM. If I'm misreading your question, let me know. |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to hear 0.01BTC return durations of 1080ti Rig owners.
How many days or hours its taking with your 1080ti rig, to get 0.01Btc in hand? Of course, with number of Ti's in your rig.
For me, after testing this for a few days, it appears it reaches to 0.01BTC in around 4 days average, got eight 1080ti, and mining to zpool only.
Looking for you responses, too.
|
|
|
|
|
Here is another question, It seems Awesome Miner is switching based on USD-based profit calculations, is it possible to force it to make decisions based on BTC profits?
|
|
|
|
Doesn't matter what I do. If I touch any other miner - this remote agent shuts down mining.
Has anyone else seen this bug?
Smells like network sourced issue. Assign totally diiferent static IP to that miner. (like, if you have 192.168.1.2--10, make it 192.168.1.178 etc, far away from others) Use a different PCIe network card. They should be cheap. |
|
|
|
|
Hi all, and thanks for the answers, they were certainly useful. I have some further questions.
I am looking for utilization of rules feature but it appears its not possible to create a rule that can assess "per month" gain and apply profile switching (in fact, algorithm switching). Can any of you manage to apply such a rule? Basically, I want to make a switch if monthly gain under "Miners" tab is under or over certain numbers.
|
|
|
|
Hi, can you please share how to add this pool to awesome miner? I couldnt decide what to write to <ALGO> or <PORT> sections in pool address (below), when entering the pool to AWM. -o stratum+tcp://<ALGO>.mine.ahashpool.com:<PORT> -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p <OPTIONS>] |
|
|
|
pool is down but frontend is working. They killed the pool while they are fixing the frontend.  |
|
|
|
|
Hello all, I few questions about pools and setup of AwesomeMiner. Running eight 1080ti and a 1060.
1. Which option most people select on Options/Statistics/Statistic Settings, Current or 24 hour average?
2. I had hashrefinery and zpool enabled. My rig worked to hasrefinery and after 12 hours from initial start, while software showing a lot of profits, I have collected around 3-4 usd then I disabled hashrefinery. What I am missing in here?
3. After disabling all pools but zpool, Awesome miner currently selected neoscrypt but many times in "pool status" at zpool, equihash signed as "hot". Why its not switching to equihash?
Please forgive me if these are simple questions, but I am trying to catch the logic to success with multi algo miner.
|
|
|
|
|
I did not make a gpu benchmark and system running for 36 hours. When I tried, it seems benchmark is trying to connect nicehash. Ate there any other pool options for benchmarking?
|
|
|
|
any comments on this? : Should we remove/deselect nicehash.com from Options/Profit Switching ?
|
|
|
|
|
Should we remove/deselect nicehash.com from Options/Profit Switching ?
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time, zpool.ca site displaying "error 502 bad gateway". Is this a problem for the miner ? Because it seems continue mining without any problems.
|
|
|
|
|
