Latest posts of: Cyber

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

on: September 25, 2017, 06:49:38 PM

The last question I've got is about ICOrating platform. They have a special rubric 'scam'. How do you think, is there any use from this rubric? If yes, whether will it be somehow implemented in your project?

on: September 25, 2017, 04:43:38 PM

Good evening! Looking for another project, which will be close to DolphinBI's idea and mission, I've found a platform named ICO Tracker. There is an idea to make an alert system for important events. Will it be useful to implement such a tool on DolphinBI platform? In order not to skip X hour or pay attention to significant changes in indicators in time, for instance

on: September 23, 2017, 06:49:08 PM

Good evening! Your project seems to be quite ambitious, interesting and useful for thousands of people, wishing to invest through ICO. It seems to be unique even. Neveretheless, are there any competitors in your industry? Particulary, there exists serious enough project DolphinBi. Don't you think that you have quite enough in common? Thanks in advance.

on: September 23, 2017, 04:33:18 PM

Good evening! Your project seems to be quite ambitious, interesting and useful for thousands of people, wishing to invest through ICO. It seems to be unique even. Neveretheless, are there any competitors in your industry? Particulary, there exists serious enough project DolphinBi. Don't you think that you have quite enough in common? Thanks in advance.

on: September 21, 2017, 04:13:57 PM

Are there any measures (and if yes which ones) of verification of ico investors? Thanks in advance

on: September 21, 2017, 11:08:34 AM

Thanks a lot for extensive answers. And what fee size for subscribers do you plan to establish? It seems that there was not such information in WP and forum

on: September 21, 2017, 09:13:37 AM

Quote from: van0k on September 21, 2017, 08:48:02 AM Quote from: ato996 on September 21, 2017, 08:18:56 AM Did I understand correctly, that final user of information, provided by experts will be at the same time moderator? Or, how to deal with information that is mistakenly wrong, for example. During the earlier days, we will have to moderate content by ourselves. After a while, we will gradually transfer these responsibilities to Experts with high enough rating, so the moderation will become self-regulated (like in Wikipedia). Did I understand it right that with this system the possibility of posting deliberately wrong information (for promotion of particular ICO) is excluded? And what about about authors? Is it possible for them to publish false information through their channels of information

on: September 21, 2017, 07:02:31 AM

One more question. If there is no preliminary test for experts, how will first subscribers choose among them someone to rely on? Taking into consideration that during the short time after Dolphing start working there will be not so much marks made by your team. And will portfolio data of experts be somehow verified or proved?

on: September 20, 2017, 08:25:29 PM

To say the truth, it's a very interesting and ambitious project. It unites consumers and sellers in efficient way. But it's intersting for me personally, are there any limitations on or max level of price/fee which is set on widget by authors themselves? I mean that if the author sees his widget is becoming more and more popular, won't he establish too high price, so that the widget will be affordable only for small percentage of users? Does your company consider it's as aproblem?

Pages: [1]