What do you think about ICO Stats? Very useful platform with constantly updating information. Will you have the same widgets?

Your platform seems alike the Dolphin BI project. Do you know anything about it and what makes you differ from them? You operate in the same field, what indicators do you use for your analysis, are they similar to those of Dolphin?

Oh, and I also wanted to ask you about the ICO Rating. Their product seems alike and also convenient. Will you have the same project cards and rating system divided by categories- upcoming, ongoing, past, scam. It's actually very useful.

Good idea. Seems alike the Dolphin BI project, there are some common features. What would you say about Dolphin? Are they competitors or do you have different market positioning?
Thanks in advance, just trying to figure out the most convenient analysis tool.

I, actually, like your project, but searching for similar ones, found one called TokenLab. Do you know about it and how Dolphin BI is better than it? What makes analysis by Dolphin BI more reliable or convenient?

It was stated that a Social Networks Sentiment Analysis widget is going to be realised, which will gather the opinions of public and key persona in it. I wonder whether it is legal to use their names in a widget without a consent to the processing of personal dataa and also using their intellectual property (posts written by them) without some other kind of legal consent, especially with commercial purposes. How this process is going to be organised?

Is it possible for the Author or an Expert to ask to delete their work from the platform (either analysis or widget)?
And also- if it has been concluded that someone's widget is a plagiarism and there are Subscribers who paid for its usage and would like to continue using it, would the moderators delete the widget and return the money or would they simply rechannel the money to the original inventor leaving the widget in the system?

Is there a maximum of reward to be gained, or the sum might tend to infinity?

By the way, how are you going to eradicate the plagiarism in widgets and Experts' evaluations? It seems there going to be lots of widgets and evaluations placed by rating, so what will stop people from copying (even partly) the ideas of those not yet rated highly newbies' ideas?

As I understood, quality of Experts' evaluations and reviews in manual Widgets is evaluated by Subscribers and automatically. Will these two types (manual by Subcribers and automated) be evaluated separately with own rate or will it be an aggregate estimate (if so, what is the "weight" prescribed to each of this type of evaluation?)? What will be the algorithm of automated evaluation of Experts' evaluations be based on (formula 3 from Appendix 1 or some special machine algorithm)?
Thanks in advance.