Ah, HamnChess, if nothing else I can pop in every few days for some amusement.  If you look at my history you will see that in my first post I worked out the math of how many tokens would be issued, before any official word was given. I also told everyone I had made contact with the escrow and confirmed his involvement. I commented "I love the clear mission and the generous profit-sharing program." In my second post I revealed that I had made an investment, and said, "I too would like more details regarding the team and how they will execute their plan, but am willing to take the risk at this point in spite of sparse details." In my third post I confirmed that the exchange was working, expressed my enthusiasm, and shared a link to their roadmap (which had not been shared). 
{Regarding the WCX roadmap (https://trello.com/b/596LMpPZ/wcx-product-roadmap), it's nice to see a list of things they are working on. I could express a concern that only one person is listed for doing the work (John Reyes), but maybe he is a one-man wonder. I might mention a concern that the last logged activity is Sept 12, but if I did that you would have to come up with a new way to insult me and I don't want to tax your vocabulary.}
In my 4th post I shared the email regarding refund of investment. In my 5th post I confirmed that I had received my refund. I also said, "Although I would like more transparency regarding team members and the company overall, to this point they have done as they said they would do." But I did start to express some concerns about the potential for success, saying "there are a lot of unknown variables" . . . In my 6th post I wrote to @wcxofficial, thanking them and wishing for their success, but also asking for either a multi-sig wallet or an escrow before reinvesting. However, it was not until my 7th post that I became one of your targets! My transformation into a "useless troll" was when I said, "What I love about this project is the profit-sharing model--I think that is just brilliant! I also love that they want to become the world's leading exchange. I think with the right team they could reach this goal. But there is the Achilles's heel--we simply do not know the team! We don't know how many people are working on reaching their goals, what problems they are running into, or anything else." So, yes, I'm very clearly trolling! I even raised it up a notch and became a "bloody schmuck" when I listed some potential competitors!! And for me to give responsible disclosure by listing which of these companies I did or did not have a stake in, I became a shill as well. You, on the other hand, have not disclosed your financial incentives that could affect your judgment. I can only assume you have a large stake in WCX; otherwise why spend so much energy knocking down anyone who presents a concern?

By the way, to my knowledge I do not have an alter-ego who publishes under the name of @benjismarket--but for me to deny any connection to him probably just makes me more suspicious. Besides, (s)he does seem to understand rational argumentation so there could in fact be a connection between us. Here is another intriguing possibility: Have you considered that @benjismarket and @wcxofficial could be one and the same?? They both are starting exchanges, they are both anonymous, they are both trying to address the problems with existing exchanges and promising better user experience, . . . if they are not the same person, then one should hire the other and work together rather than compete!