So I am mining Ethash on a 1080 TI with 11 Gb under linux and I notice that with only relatively minor variation whenever a share is submitted it is around 52ms, give or take only 5ms almost every time.

If there is a particularly "unlucky" block and it takes a lot longer for one of the miners to find a share and move it on to the next block, I never see a time to find share of, say, 120ms.

I haven't run the stats, but I would say the distribution of times does not reflect what I would expect for the solve time, you would think that all guesses are equal up until a block is solved, so they shouldn't be so heavily clustered as this - what's up here and what does this tell us about maybe optimising the algorithm?

Superblock has been activated, 0.5 XMCC from each reward goes to coin governance fund of some kind, still trying to work out the details

Price is high and now the nodes instead of miners favoured, it's great if you bought nodes 3 months ago.

Well it looks like the increased rewards have really kicked it along, but seems rewards are every second day instead of every day, so really only x1.25 compared to earlier, but price is up. Let us see how it lasts.

Yeah, I am running 7 masternodes, about to be 8, but struggling to retain faith that this is going anywhere anytime soon.

A VPS at Vultr like that costs $640 USD a month, so they must be expecting returns to at least cover costs pretty soon or no one will run their nodes, seems like a very strong positive signal to me.

And LTC

Why The Red Flag Post is a Red Herring

The NEO "red flag" post makes some accurate statements, but are they relevant?
Seems to me the post twists context to a pre-desired outcome.
Remembering that tokenised money systems (eg Fiat and crypto) and religion have a strange common element in that they only work if you believe in them, what are the key aspects that make a good crypto?

1) Genuine use case or utility value.
2) Strong community and minimum critical mass of believers and adopters.
3) Active devs with credibility and that foster and follow the "greater good" of a flourishing [Suspicious link removed]munity.
4) Usability for the relevant use case, eg BTC has lost usability for spending, but due to the belief system and relatively mature tech still has use case for store of value.
5) Lack of impacting regulatory issues.
6) Stability of base parameters - eg number of coins to be circulated etc.

If you examine NEO in this context, it looks OK to me, worth a punt, as we say in Australia.

Anything can happen in crypto but the red flags raised are not really relevant in the context of the criteria I list.

I had this problem when I modified the RPC username/address - short answer reinstall from scratch is easiest quick path forwards.

Yes, is it broken or busy?

ok so in nano paste the following line in

* * * * * cd /home/YOURUSERNAME/sentinel && ./venv/bin/python bin/sentinel.py >/dev/null 2>&1


where it says YOURUSERNAME change this to the name of the user you made (in the monacocoin website tutorial they use "bob")

so like this

* * * * * cd /home/bob/sentinel && ./venv/bin/python bin/sentinel.py >/dev/null 2>&1