Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
have any news?
They're still working on the fork to Lyra2rev3. We've had a few updates on Discord, but nothing definitive yet. Should be soon. fork already? Good to see there's still interest. I'm in with HANA for the long haul, but a bit frustrated by the slow development. CryptoBridge requirement for KYC isn't helping much. But hey, if you're looking for cheap coins right now, HANA is there for the taking. 
|
|
|
have any news?
They're still working on the fork to Lyra2rev3. We've had a few updates on Discord, but nothing definitive yet. Should be soon.
|
|
|
Confirmed. Pool payouts and CryptoBridge withdrawals going through to my wallet just fine. Good job Hana Team.  Now, how about that fork to a new algo in the interest of ASIC resistance?
|
|
|
Way cool.  I think this looks more like a pink wind farm...
I love Hanacoin pink!  We are holding a competition on our discord server with 17,000 Hana up for grabs. Please join and enter: Discord: https://discord.gg/XM4JnfXI'm in.
|
|
|
Newbie Here.... Does anyone know what will happen to Z9 now since ZCASH announced overwinter Hard Fork.
Where does it say anything about Overwinter including a hard fork?
|
|
|
Ya...at best only zcash will be remaining on equihash by the time you get your unit with very high difficulties you'll be looking at a 1-2 year ROI unless you did a coupon deal...no point in getting anything but batch 1.
No one knows what the market will do. Profits could shoot up in a month's time... or not. So, what would you guys say the chances are of batch 2 (Aug 24 ship date) being worthwhile? 50/50? I'm willing to take the risk as long as there's a reasonable chance of at least breaking even. Just because I think this mining stuff is cool.  LOL @VoskCoin... making a deal with the devil.
|
|
|
This proves a number of things to us as a company, least of all that you even consider the people willing to put their commission and systems to promote and fund you. It certainly doesn't do a whole lot to inspire confidence in a project.
|
|
|
Thanks for the open and honest discussion on this matter, Kirk. I guess we simple GPU miners are simply going to have to get what we can while the gettin' is good. Our intentions with our graduate program are to develop new ideas to defend against ASIC miners and/or delay the ability for asic miners to overtake the hash power of our network. Long live the resistance! May the GeForce be with us. 
|
|
|
I posted this in the Ravencoin thread, but I think it's relevant here, as well. There are some interesting comments by Kristy-Leigh Minehan (OhGodAGirl), CEO and Cofounder of Mineority, on the subject of ASIC resistance. Jump to 12:45 where she starts with, "No Proof of Work is safe." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3i3jpJqgooParticularly at 14:47, "There is no such thing as ASIC resistance." Would love to hear your thoughts on this, Kirk.
|
|
|
People are trying to increase their post number so they can either sell the accounts or be involved with those airdrop like advertising campaigns for new coins..
Ah... thanks for explaining that. I was wondering about it, myself. There are some interesting comments by Kristy-Leigh Minehan (OhGodAGirl) on this youtube interview about ASIC resistance where she uses RVN as an example. Jump to 12:45 where she starts with "No Proof of Work is safe." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3i3jpJqgooParticularly at 14:47, "There is no such thing as ASIC resistance."
|
|
|
As long as the block times stay consistently fast even as it approaches max supply of 122.5 million and continues to be ASIC and hack-resistant, I can see this being really successful. That's the technical aspect. I'm very interested in the marketing focus. Targeting youth, e-sports, and talent from universities sounds like a smart thing. And considering the CEO and COO are from a very successful specialty sporting goods company, I can see them pulling that off. It would be cool to see, when the time comes, if they provide English versions of their South Korean marketing campaigns to give us an idea of how things are going. There are a number of things about this project that appeal to me. And, as I said before, I'm excited to be in on the ground floor. I'm new at this and having to start low and slow, but I'll be throwing every dollar I have into expanding my meager miner over the next few months and devoting it all to Hana for the long run. That may end up being a big, wasteful mistake... or it might be one of the smartest things I've ever done. 
|
|
|
Accounts = unique wallet addresses Workers = all workers under a wallet address For example, 1 wallet address could have 3 workers (miner1, miner2, miner3) etc.
Ah, ok... got it. Appreciate the explanation.
|
|
|
Thanks for the quick reply, Kirk. We haven't had this reported before. From having a very quick look, I can see weekendpool.net has 62 miners. From memory, weekendpool miners are the total workers connected, not accounts (not sure if this has changed in the last few days). Hanapool has 60 connected miners (these are accounts, not workers). So when hanapool wins a block, it will be split between more accounts. I suspect this is the reason for the lower quantity. Well, regardless of the issue, the bottom line for this lowly miner is coins/hr and HanaPool is severely lagging behind the likes of WeekendPool. I was using SmithPool, with similar higher results, as well, but they seem to be having a problem staying online. We have been working on an issue with miningcore(the pool software) where the pool hashrate returned in the API is displaying higher than it should for Lyra2REv2. It doesn't affect the underlying hash it is a multiple applied to the display only. Here is a link to the issue: https://github.com/coinfoundry/miningcore/issues/211Yeah, that was something else I was wondering about. WeekendPool is currently showing 62 miners with 6.6 Gh/s, and HanaPool has 61 "miners" (accounts?) with over 31 Gh/s.
|
|
|
I did some casual comparison with HanaPool and a couple others. Granted, I, and my humble 2x GTX 1060 rig, may not be the best suited for such a task, but I'm noticing HanaPool payments are considerably lower than WeekendPool and SmithPool... like, by half. Hanapool sample (average one hour):  WeekendPool sample (hourly payments):  Am I missing something, or is HanaPool a serious waste of hashpower?
|
|
|
My apologies if it seems I'm spamming the thread. Just a little excited to be so new to crypto and getting in on a new project on it's launch day, I guess.  Just wanted to point out that I tried ccminer 2.2.6 today, was on 2.2.2. I'm seeing about 4 MH/s more on my 2x GTX 1060s with 2.2.6. Also, just as a "for what it's worth", I can mine Hana on my GTX 760 2GB card - what my old, reliable desktop PC is still running.  I know... a whopping 1190-ish kH/s, but hey, every bit counts, right? Without using the "-i" setting in the .bat file it defaults to intensity 18. Makes for a rather slow desktop. I'll just be letting it run at night.
|
|
|
Noob question. Does a coin have to be listed on an exchange before it starts showing up on CoinMarketCap?
|
|
|
You had me at ASIC resistant. I also agree about the philosophy on privacy coins... they are going to be subject to ever increasing scrutiny. I love the girl who talking video about hana coins.
Heh... let's hope so, she's the CEO of the project.  Targeting young people, working with regulators for transparency, sponsoring gamers, promoting charity, and launching on the day of a historic international peace summit! Sounds like a very interesting coalescence of ideas and events. May you succeed in every way. And... here's hoping for peace in Korea.
|
|
|
|