Show Posts
Have requested second time to add Passive Coin to CoinMarketCap.
Not any answer. Seems this 100K volume is a crazy requirement and small niche (but good) projects have not any chances to get listed.
I really do not understand this CMC's policy.
From other side, traders and crypto enthusiasts exaggerate (to bump, to overemphasize) the role of CMC. When I present Passive Coin to cryptolovers, the first question they ask: Is this coin listed on CMC?
A lot of people treat CMC like some kind of "crypto bible".
Anyway, Passive Coin is listed now at World Coin Index. If CMC dislike to list us, we are going to list at alternative services, with pleasure.
Not any answer. Seems this 100K volume is a crazy requirement and small niche (but good) projects have not any chances to get listed.
I really do not understand this CMC's policy.
From other side, traders and crypto enthusiasts exaggerate (to bump, to overemphasize) the role of CMC. When I present Passive Coin to cryptolovers, the first question they ask: Is this coin listed on CMC?
A lot of people treat CMC like some kind of "crypto bible".
Anyway, Passive Coin is listed now at World Coin Index. If CMC dislike to list us, we are going to list at alternative services, with pleasure.
Yes. Their arbitrary rules are ridiculous and change without, seemingly, any reason whatsoever. 3-4 months ago, minimum trading volume needed to be $10,000. Last month $50,000. Now $100,000?! WTF do they expect?
And I agree. People rely on CMC too much as the "bible" of how well a coin/token is doing. It's ridiculous.
There are other services that are doing better and are actually approachable and transparent, like LiveCoinWatch. The fact that you can't find a single REAL persona behind CMC is appalling. Gliss?! Who even is he? NO ONE KNOWS!
