Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
What is required for ravencoin mining after the algo change?
|
|
|
nvOC images dont have cuda-10 pre installed you should install cuda 10
Did that, thanks!! Also it seems I had forgot to copy nvoc-miner.json over from t-rex 0.9.2 cuda directory. -- Tigel
|
|
|
Tried to upgrade T-Rex to cuda 10 version. extracted 9.2 to fresh directory and made symblic link: m1@miner-075:~/NVOC/mining/miners/T_Rex$ ls -la recommended lrwxrwxrwx 1 m1 m1 47 Apr 24 06:30 recommended -> /home/m1/NVOC/mining/miners/T_Rex/0.9.2-cuda10/ m1@miner-075:~/NVOC/mining/miners/T_Rex$ ls -la recommended/ total 18328 drwxrwxr-x 2 m1 m1 4096 Apr 24 06:26 . drwxrwxr-x 5 m1 m1 4096 Apr 24 06:30 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 m1 m1 3876 Feb 3 12:57 config_example -rwx------ 1 m1 m1 9980164 Feb 3 13:03 t-rex -rw-rw-r-- 1 m1 m1 8757091 Feb 3 13:13 t-rex-0.9.2-linux-cuda10.0.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 m1 m1 15758 Feb 3 12:57 t-rex-help.txt m1@miner-075:~/NVOC/mining/miners/T_Rex$
I get error stating /home/m1/NVOC/mining/miners/T_Rex/recommended not found, check your settings. What I might be missing ?
|
|
|
Openrig.net has Changed its Terms of Service:
Service now requires US residence.
Until otherwise stated, service will only be provided to US residents.
All non-US resident accounts will no longer be able to access their dashboard on openrig.net.
If you have operated Rigs in the last week; your user info, including Rig endpoints (Rigs will continue to work with their current settings), will remain active until April 20th.
If you have not operated Rigs in the last week your account and all related data has been deleted.
On April 20th, all non-US resident accounts and all related data will be deleted.
Ensure that you have modified all scripts to execute locally or else use a different control method or OS by then.
Why is this? -- Tigel
|
|
|
This is the hottest coin right now - This project is going to break into the Top100 by the end of the year, mark my words...
Why?
|
|
|
Is RadeonVII supported?
Nope, it's Nvidia only. -- Tigel
|
|
|
How do i use the trex miner for RVN ? i see in in folder but its not in 1bash ?
Change: X16R_MINER="ZENEMYminer" to: X16R_MINER="T_Rex" -- Tigel
|
|
|
Did the recent price increase make RVN most profitable coin to mine with AMD cards? Are you sure you would not be better of by just mining for example XMR and buying RVN instead? Well, WTH, I can go & check WTM by myself. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Please add rito coin (RITO), X21S algo. Can be mined with t-rex, atleast. And t-rex could be updated aswell. https://ritocoin.org/-- Tigel Will be added in next release. You can check 3.1-dev 1bash.template 4f2f31d commit and 0miner b6022f9 commit on github to see how to add it your self until next release gets ready. T-Rex updated to 0.9.2 in 3.0-stable miners Awesome, thank you!
|
|
|
Please add rito coin (RITO), X21S algo. Can be mined with t-rex, atleast. And t-rex could be updated aswell. https://ritocoin.org/-- Tigel
|
|
|
FPGA switching from Raven to Monero?
|
|
|
Could someone please test Ravencoin.
|
|
|
My vote goes for nvOC aswell.
|
|
|
Nanopool uses slash as separator for wallet and workername while most of other pools use dot. Has this been taken into consideration?
You can override default wallet separator '.' with '/' on a per-coin basis. Just do it for every coin you mine at nanopool. @zloyneo: have you done this?
|
|
|
Hi, can anyone expline how exactly update TRex miner please
Sorry for late reply, You can use @Tigel how to or post a heads up here or in discord channel with miner update link and we will update them in miners repo. Updated some miners: t-rex 0.8.8 z-enemy 1.28 CryptoDredge 0.14.0 Just update your nvOC bash ~/NVOC/mining/nvOC upgrade Good afternoon. Can't connect to the new RVN Nanopool pool. Writes errors: _[0m_[0;93m20181217 00:10:22 WARN: failed to subscribe, JSON-RPC call failed: member "result" must have Json::ValueType 6 instead of 5 (original json {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true} ) _[0m_[1;91m20181217 00:10:22 ERROR: No connection, retry after 10 seconds Check with your miner help thread and see if your miner command line is correct or not. You can see the miner start command in gnome-terminal. Nanopool uses slash as separator for wallet and workername while most of other pools use dot. Has this been taken into consideration?
|
|
|
Hi, can anyone expline how exactly update TRex miner please
I believe the official way is described here: https://github.com/papampi/nvOC_minersIn case you don't feel comfortable with git and want just your T-rex updated: T-Rex miner is located in: /home/m1/NVOC/mining/miners/T_Rex/recommended, this directory is a softlink to recommended version. - login as m1 - "nvOC stop" - download newest t-rex to <download_path> - "cd /home/m1/NVOC/mining/miners/T_Rex" - mkdir <version> I believe newest is 0.8.6 so do: "mkdir 0.8.6" - "cp <download_path>/t-rex.new.version.tar.xz ." (this will copy new t-rex to current directory, don't for get the dot .) - "cd <version>" (0.8.6 in this case) - "tar xvfz ../t-rex.new.version.tar.xz" (unzip the tarball packet) - "mv t-rex ccminer" (rename t-rex to ccminer) - "cd .." - "rm recommended" (remove softlink to old version directory) - "ln -s 0.8.6 recommended" (create new softlink to new version) - nvOC start Writing this from top of my head, hopefully got it right. -- Tigel
|
|
|
X16r Windows T-Rex 8.3, cuda 9.1 NVidia 388.13 mem -502 CBA to update NVidia drivers. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) 20181202 14:42:11 [ OK ] 97/97 - 18.70 MH/s, 164ms 20181202 14:42:14 [ OK ] 98/98 - 18.70 MH/s, 169ms 20181202 14:42:29 [ OK ] 99/99 - 18.70 MH/s, 160ms 20181202 14:42:35 [ OK ] 100/100 - 18.70 MH/s, 160ms 20181202 14:42:35 GPU #0: ASUS P104-100 - 18.70 MH/s, [T:58C, P:132W, F:46%, E:145kH/W] 20181202 14:42:35 Shares/min: 5.796 (average 5.41) 20181202 14:42:35 Uptime: 18 mins 29 secs 20181202 14:42:42 [ OK ] 101/101 - 18.70 MH/s, 160ms 20181202 14:42:45 [ OK ] 102/102 - 18.70 MH/s, 164ms 20181202 14:42:55 [ OK ] 103/103 - 18.70 MH/s, 160ms 20181202 14:43:05 [ OK ] 104/104 - 18.70 MH/s, 160ms 20181202 14:43:13 [ OK ] 105/105 - 18.69 MH/s, 150ms 20181202 14:43:13 GPU #0: ASUS P104-100 - 18.69 MH/s, [T:58C, P:127W, F:46%, E:145kH/W] 20181202 14:43:13 Shares/min: 5.7 (average 5.49) 20181202 14:43:13 Uptime: 19 mins 7 secs -- Tigel Nice! you have core set to 0 and Powerlimit? i been running with core 0 and little bit minus mem.. Thank you! Core +100, PL 75%
|
|
|
Perhaps you should look at what GPUHoarder was saying on sqrl-acorn Discord starting at 6:52 pm on Dec 4 (today)
What did he say?
|
|
|
|