Bitcoin Forum
August 10, 2024, 08:55:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: A4 Dominator - Pre-Order Group Buy - 280mh, roughly 1000w, $1800 + shipping on: March 27, 2018, 11:36:36 AM
anyone know the password for the G5-20-V1.1.1TF image for SSH the controller with the Orange PI .? .... or SSH login .
Try 'innosilicon'
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: A4 Dominator - Pre-Order Group Buy - 280mh, roughly 1000w, $1800 + shipping on: November 08, 2017, 10:59:53 PM
Anyone else tinker with overclocking these?

I have 2 so far and 2 more on the way tomorrow, all used. The 2 I already have are newer ones (april & june 2017) with Orange Pi controllers, running firmware v1.1.1.  Using the login creds previously mentioned in this thread (root/innosilicon), I am launching the cgminer manually with a clock value of 1600 instead of 1248.  This results in the hashing rate being around 364 instead of 276.  I kept the voltage at the default value of 820.  So far stable, temps are virtually unchanged.  Can't get any higher than 1600 tho, I think that might be because the PLL or something runs at 1600 as well (saw something about this in the log).  I figure if my temps are normal and voltage was not bumped any higher, how bad could it be. Result is about a 32% overclock.  I'm assuming this is only possible because I have newer batches, so don't take this as a good reference point if you have older ones.  Just wondering if anyone else was tinkering with overclocking these to squeeze every last ounce out of them, and if so what you did to get above 1600.

Another thing I'd like to try is get ahold of the firmware from an A4+ once they're around - wondering if the newer build of cgminer in there might have some improvements that could be copied over to this build.

Go to the web page, stop mining if you have it already mining.  Putty into the miner, change directory to /var/www, and here is the command I use (changed the worker name in case anyone wants to donate some mining time to me in return for this info, so if not change that part to your own pool info)

sudo ./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub -u 3Qk7dwXXn1Qr2jfK2aetLZod43v5sJy4ow.Donate -p x --A1Pll1 1600 --A1Pll2 1600 --A1Pll3 1600 --A1Pll4 1600 --A1Pll5 1600 --A1Pll6 1600 --A1Vol 820  --diff 8 --api-listen --api-network --cs 8 --stmcu 0 --hwreset > cgminer.log  &



Nice overclock. Powerdraw per Mhash should be same as with stock cloks. As you didn't up voltage.

So, what is your real hashrate at nicehash? Can you show me your graph?
3  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] NiceHash.com - sell & buy hash rate cloud mining service / multipool on: October 22, 2017, 01:38:40 PM
Hey,

Recently I bought Innosilicon A4 Dominator miners but I'm really unsatisfied with my Nicehash results. Miners are updated with Nicehash suggested firmware but still I'm getting very low real hashrate. This guy from Nicehash here is getting stable 272MH/s but im not even close to this result...

Miners are working at 825MH/s total power but nicehash medium result from 1 day is only 735MH/s - graph from nicehash. According to Nicehash firmware update I should get something around 816MH/s

Im using xnsub parameter. Tried tweaks with voltage 810-815-820, tried --queue 0 --scan-time 1 --expiry 1, tried stratum proxy, changed ISP to get better pings, tried starting with diff 8 and 8192, tried in comments: d=262144, 131072, 65536.
My controllers are TF card - Orange Pi. Ping to nicehash is 55ms. Tried ver 1.1.0 and 1.1.1

I know that difficulty is increased but that shouldn't be a problem, maybe there this problem with my duplicate shares? Maybe there is way to force nicehash or miners to hash different blocks that will lower duplicate rejects?

Can you show me your results or have some suggestions to me?
Really thanks for any help!!!
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: A4 Dominator - Pre-Order Group Buy - 280mh, roughly 1000w, $1800 + shipping on: October 19, 2017, 11:16:32 AM
Orange PI - TF version 1.1.1 (G5-20-V1.1.1TF) SSH password is:
login: root
password: innosilicon

Got all my workers, but still working bad. Changed ISP with lower pings.
From 6 tubes and 3 controllers im getting average of 737Mh/s on nicehash. That is 245 per unit.
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: A4 Dominator - Pre-Order Group Buy - 280mh, roughly 1000w, $1800 + shipping on: October 13, 2017, 05:03:27 PM
Hey,

Recently I bought Innosilicon A4 Dominator miners but I'm really unsatisfied with my Nicehash results. Miners are updated with suggested firmware but still I'm getting very low real hashrate. This guy here is getting stable 272MH/s but im not even close to this result... I don't know from what batch are my miners.

Miners are working at 825MH/s total power but nicehash medium result from 6 hours is only 696MH/s - graph from nicehash. Im using xnsub parameter. Here is my miner statistics page from one node - I have two of them.
Because of controller failure I have 3 tubes in one controller but with two tubes in one controller results are that same weak... My controllers are TF card - Orange Pi. Ping to nicehash is 80ms.
Can you show me your results or have some suggestions to me?

I'm really disappointed, was wondering to invest more for L3+ but calculations resulted in favor of A4 products but not in this case. L3+ users are getting stable 488MH/s out of box when miner speed is 504MH/s!

Here are some cgminer summary:
[2017-10-10 23:22:16.876941] BA20 | (5s):68.92M | A:1998848 R:65536 HW:1 WU:48482.6/m
[2017-10-10 23:22:16.877127] BA21 | (5s):68.92M | A:2490368 R:229376 HW:78 WU:63873.8/m
[2017-10-10 23:22:16.877305] BA22 | (5s):68.92M | A:2228221 R:65536 HW:41 WU:53869.4/m
[2017-10-10 23:22:16.877495] BA23 | (5s):68.86M | A:1802239 R:32768 HW:71 WU:43095.6/m

[2017-10-11 00:27:11.848768] BA21 | (5s):70.30M | A:12025855 R:1048576 HW:136 WU:58184.4/m
[2017-10-11 00:27:11.848958] BA22 | (5s):70.30M | A:12877824 R:786432 HW:77 WU:60809.3/m
[2017-10-11 00:27:11.849159] BA23 | (5s):70.30M | A:10190848 R:393216 HW:1019 WU:47101.7/m
[2017-10-11 00:27:11.849356] BA24 | (5s):70.30M | A:11829247 R:589824 HW:705 WU:55267.9/m
[2017-10-11 00:27:11.849541] BA25 | (5s):70.30M | A:12353536 R:294912 HW:743 WU:56872.0/m

Really thanks for any help.

Are you on V2.0.3beta?

Ensure that you are on this firmware or better.

For Nicehash, the #xnsub wont work with A4s -- the L3+ does not support #xnsub too.

I get 280MHs++ consistently by just putting "d=131072" in password field.

My A4s are 815mV.

Still the same weak result... I disconnected one tube due to replacement.

WORKER81: 2 tubes 280MH/s (innosilicon value)
WORKER82: 3 tubes 420MH/s (innosilicon value)
Expected real nicehash value 272MH/s + 408MH/s = 680MH/s (as showed by nicehash on firmware update news)
Real reached nicehash value 556MH/s
GRAPH

Till today I tested this values:
d=131072, d=65536, x as password
810mV/815mV/820mV
clock 1000MHz, 1200MHz, 1244MHz
--queue 0
--scan-time 1
--expiry 1
Stratum proxy (results very weak).

Wanted to test Raspberry cgminer but it's not working on Orange PI. Don't know where to download older TF card versions to test older cgminers (<1.1.0).

Sadly that nicehash is not providing graphs for individual workers.

Anyone has different ideas?
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: A4 Dominator - Pre-Order Group Buy - 280mh, roughly 1000w, $1800 + shipping on: October 11, 2017, 02:37:16 PM
Maybe should I use older firmware? I run now at V1.1.0 because I have TF version - Orange Pi.
This version was released with V2.1.0 for SD so its probably the same version of cgminer for another hardware. I got message that XNSUB is working. Maybe I should also remove #xnsub parameter from url?

Restarted miners: both with d=131072, one with #xnsub, second without. I'll let it run for few hours and write results here.
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: A4 Dominator - Pre-Order Group Buy - 280mh, roughly 1000w, $1800 + shipping on: October 11, 2017, 01:22:04 PM
Hey,

Recently I bought Innosilicon A4 Dominator miners but I'm really unsatisfied with my Nicehash results. Miners are updated with suggested firmware but still I'm getting very low real hashrate. This guy here is getting stable 272MH/s but im not even close to this result... I don't know from what batch are my miners.

Miners are working at 825MH/s total power but nicehash medium result from 6 hours is only 696MH/s - graph from nicehash. Im using xnsub parameter. Here is my miner statistics page from one node - I have two of them.
Because of controller failure I have 3 tubes in one controller but with two tubes in one controller results are that same weak... My controllers are TF card - Orange Pi. Ping to nicehash is 80ms.
Can you show me your results or have some suggestions to me?

I'm really disappointed, was wondering to invest more for L3+ but calculations resulted in favor of A4 products but not in this case. L3+ users are getting stable 488MH/s out of box when miner speed is 504MH/s!

Here are some cgminer summary:
[2017-10-10 23:22:16.876941] BA20 | (5s):68.92M | A:1998848 R:65536 HW:1 WU:48482.6/m
[2017-10-10 23:22:16.877127] BA21 | (5s):68.92M | A:2490368 R:229376 HW:78 WU:63873.8/m
[2017-10-10 23:22:16.877305] BA22 | (5s):68.92M | A:2228221 R:65536 HW:41 WU:53869.4/m
[2017-10-10 23:22:16.877495] BA23 | (5s):68.86M | A:1802239 R:32768 HW:71 WU:43095.6/m

[2017-10-11 00:27:11.848768] BA21 | (5s):70.30M | A:12025855 R:1048576 HW:136 WU:58184.4/m
[2017-10-11 00:27:11.848958] BA22 | (5s):70.30M | A:12877824 R:786432 HW:77 WU:60809.3/m
[2017-10-11 00:27:11.849159] BA23 | (5s):70.30M | A:10190848 R:393216 HW:1019 WU:47101.7/m
[2017-10-11 00:27:11.849356] BA24 | (5s):70.30M | A:11829247 R:589824 HW:705 WU:55267.9/m
[2017-10-11 00:27:11.849541] BA25 | (5s):70.30M | A:12353536 R:294912 HW:743 WU:56872.0/m

Really thanks for any help.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!