 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
Hi all, please keep in mind:
1. Issues raised during the 1 week we provided for that purpose means that exact reward allocation might have fluctuated.
2. Some of these issues raised involved plagiarism or debating the size of rewards. These have resulted in some major changes, such as removal of reward in the case of blatant plagiarism.
3. If you still believe you have a strong case for some issue, you can DM me or message us at intercom on our website, or via email. But as Emad said, we have a busy week, and we did allow for 1 week of raising issues beforehand. We will only respond to what we believe to be valid and sincere cases.
|
|
|
|
What is the reason that make you sure that this judgement is already fair. Please read the blog sent by DANIPAY correctly. What is the reason that he is deserved to got this acchivement about 310 anat? He created 2 blogs and 1 youtube. The contain of both blogs is same but they have different language. The more, there was 1 account which followed 1 blog but why you gave 110 anat to him? Please give me the reason, so I can believe that the judgement is already fair.
Hi Sabrina-anto, sorry you feel this way. One possible reason for certain discrepancies in rewards is that we had to divided evaluation, which means not all of the posts were reviewed by multiple people. The main reason was because he was the only one who seemed to have some quality standard to his video, at the very least narrating it personally. Whilst his English wasn't great, it showed -as far as we could tell- original effort, similarly with his other post, and enjoyed the narrative. Personal blog and media platforms enjoy a degree of leniency if it shows commitment to quality and originality. I don't remember reviewing yours though, and I think my colleague might have opened the wrong link - the content wasn't as bad as the rating suggested. I will update your rewards to what believe is more proportional, but on a general note for you and everyone, please try to keep to the topic of your own content unless you suspect fraud. |
|
|
|
This is bullshit.. I retweet since first week. My join request is under the first 100 and i still didnt got even one stack.
Fixed  To all asking about changes in blog or media rewards: The first spreadsheet was inconsistent in the rewards system outlined at the beginning. We have personally gone through all the documents, done our best to assess each post carefully. As a result, we have what we believe is a fairer distribution: We were strict with high rewards, leaving that for unique or effortful posts - it wouldn't be fair if people who clearly spent more time and effort would be rewarded the same as someone who just roughly translated someone else's post or -even worse- seems to have just put something through google's translate and cleaned it up. One of my coworkers didn't expect seeing his writing in indonesian. Please note that another consequence of this new distribution is that even if you have less stakes, you might have more tokens allocated. For example 70 stakes in the current distribution is worth more tokens than 100 in the previous one. In addition to the above, keep in mind the rules before raising issues with blog/media rewards. Barring a exceptional situations, copies of the same post on generic platforms and other non-visible (even if personal) platforms don't count as multiple rewards. I've personally gone through most of your posts, and whilst I have been especially strict regarding copy-paste and very low-effort content, I have been quite lenient on quality (rule 1) and posts on multiple platforms (rule 7). The initial allocations were a bit sloppy in my opinion (for example, a lot of copycats not detected), so we redid them to ensure fairness. This means some got more, some got less, and I just ask for your understanding. That being said, if you think you deserve more stakes despite having assessed them carefully according to the rules clearly laid out on the first post, please make a thorough case here, both I and others can review. Remember that if you ask for more than worth, you're taking away rewards from others as well. |
|
|
|
Dear supporters! As the CSO of Ananas, I want to thank you all for your help and involvement! We loved your active engagement during the bounty campaign, and have worked hard to make sure contributors will be fairly rewarded. Please be reminded the bounty campaign ended the 16th of October. Contributions thereafter unfortunately will not count to bounty rewards. Unfortunately Jamal has been unexpectedly struck with personal matters out of both our or his control, which is the reason why -as some have noted- he has been less communicative lately. Sorry for the delay and possible confusion, we hope you understand and thank you for your patience. This has partly been a reason for delay, as we really wanted to make sure people who made valuable contributions get the rewards they deserve and because of that have spent a lot of time personally going through the data to make sure things are correct and fair. I personally particularly enjoyed looking at your writings, even if despite the time it reviewing them all individually and checking for plagiarism! (Although tokens were not rewarded, there were some impressively creative routes taken to avoid writing something yourself.) Unfortunately I have no access to edit the documents in the Original Post, but in the following spreadsheet you can see key details of the results, such as ETH address and token rewards. [Public Spreadsheet] (Check your ETH address!) I have cleaned all Ether addresses (which sometimes involved minor detective work), but if your wallet address needs updating, please provide them now on this thread - it would be a shame if your rewards would be lost or sent to the wrong person! If you're not listed at all, it is most likely because you have broken the rules. If you have reviewed the rules and your contribution, but are convinced considerable changes need to be made, or have any issue of significance to raise, please drop a post in this thread (even if you contact us elsewhere, please accompany it with a post on the forum to ensure your identity). We will continue to do our best resolving issues and ensuring fairness, but please understand there is very little time left and have no bounty manager available. If too many issues are raised, a further delay could be possible. On a final point, some extra good news! In the very near future we are planning an airdrop to more than a thousand people, mostly people who tweeted or engaged with us on FB, as an extra thank you! Thank you again for both your contribution and patience  Best Wishes, Marco CSO Ananas Foundation So. whether Mr. Jamal still contributing as campaign manager on this project or, is no longer a campaign manager? Thank you for providing the latest updates for this project, so we all know the development of this distribution, at least you can give the right time for this distribution to us all, so that everyone knows when the time of distribution is done ... great to know that the spreadsheet has been updatted including the rewards from the bounty. why this spreadsheet isn't updatted by bounty manager??
You're very welcome Ris, it's only fair to provide clarity. Unfortunately we haven't been able to gain complete clarity on Jamal's situation, and what we do know is quite personal and won't disclose out of respect for his privacy, we hope you understand. More practically relevant: Because of the unexpected situation and lack of clarity we weren't sure when to step in. We have only recently taken it over fully, and had to do it without the Bounty manager's tools and spreadsheet formulas, which is why things took so long. Regarding distribution, we are strongly considering a further extension to ensure people can verify their addresses and possible other issues. We are just as frustrated with the delays, but with the messy information/data logistics we believe it is worth it: rushing it wouldn't be worth the risk of unfair allocation, or (even worse) having rewards sent to the wrong addresses. Because of the above reasons, we think it's a good idea to provide an opportunity to voice your opinions to find a satisfying result. Now all the data is gathered and structured, what do you think of the following:
Starting from now, we provide one week to voice any issues or report incorrect addresses. We'll do our best to solve and deal with whatever comes up, and distribute at the end of the week: November 21st. How does that sound? |
|
|
|
Dear supporters! As the CSO of Ananas, I want to thank you all for your help and involvement! We loved your active engagement during the bounty campaign, and have worked hard to make sure contributors will be fairly rewarded. Please be reminded the bounty campaign ended the 16th of October. Contributions thereafter unfortunately will not count to bounty rewards. Unfortunately Jamal has been unexpectedly struck with personal matters out of both our or his control, which is the reason why -as some have noted- he has been less communicative lately. Sorry for the delay and possible confusion, we hope you understand and thank you for your patience. This has partly been a reason for delay, as we really wanted to make sure people who made valuable contributions get the rewards they deserve and because of that have spent a lot of time personally going through the data to make sure things are correct and fair. I personally particularly enjoyed looking at your writings, even if despite the time it reviewing them all individually and checking for plagiarism! (Although tokens were not rewarded, there were some impressively creative routes taken to avoid writing something yourself.) Unfortunately I have no access to edit the documents in the Original Post, but in the following spreadsheet you can see key details of the results, such as ETH address and token rewards. [Public Spreadsheet] (Check your ETH address!) I have cleaned all Ether addresses (which sometimes involved minor detective work), but if your wallet address needs updating, please provide them now on this thread - it would be a shame if your rewards would be lost or sent to the wrong person! If you're not listed at all, it is most likely because you have broken the rules. If you have reviewed the rules and your contribution, but are convinced considerable changes need to be made, or have any issue of significance to raise, please drop a post in this thread (even if you contact us elsewhere, please accompany it with a post on the forum to ensure your identity). We will continue to do our best resolving issues and ensuring fairness, but please understand there is very little time left and have no bounty manager available. If too many issues are raised, a further delay could be possible. On a final point, some extra good news! In the very near future we are planning an airdrop to more than a thousand people, mostly people who tweeted or engaged with us on FB, as an extra thank you! Thank you again for both your contribution and patience Best Wishes, Marco CSO Ananas Foundation |
|
|
|
|
