Latest posts of: Vince34

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

on: August 19, 2018, 08:30:53 AM

Thank you vmozara and kapitulieren I'll give it a try!

on: August 18, 2018, 07:08:59 PM

Quote from: vmozara on August 18, 2018, 05:22:36 PM The worst part about JCE-miner for Vega rigs is that it is so stable - that I feel so bad to shut down 600 hours uptime rig just to update the miner version. JCE, we need hot swap updates! LOL! Could you tell us which amd driver, config, algo, and hashrate you have? I'm very curious because last time I tested JCE-miner, it was very unstable! So I'm still running SRBminer with 4 vega 56, and it's very stable so far!

on: August 12, 2018, 05:56:31 PM

Quote from: RuMiner on August 12, 2018, 04:25:30 PM Quote from: Vince34 on August 12, 2018, 01:10:39 PM I have 4 VEGA 56 (3 ref & 1 peace of sh..) I was at 7500-7520h/s and now I'm at 7620-7630h/s with the same "summer" profile (CC:1340Mhz / MC:900Mhz) that doubling trick doesn't work for me, but I have 7920-7925 h/s without it on 4 vega56 (ref or noname idk, it was OEM and the only sign on it is RADEON), сс 1450-1470, mc 925-935 (found exact stable maximum for each card). I don't know wether the trick works or not and I don't care, +20h/s? no big deal! BTW, if you have only RADEON written on your vegas, you have ref cards My non ref card (hynix memory) runs stable at 1775 with higher consumption My 3 ref cards (samsung memory) go over 2000h/s with CC:1407 / MC:941 but run too hot so I lower the frequencies during the summer

on: August 12, 2018, 01:10:39 PM

Quote from: mk111 on August 12, 2018, 11:13:57 AM Quote from: Vince34 on August 12, 2018, 11:03:00 AM Me LOL so tell us how... Haha, I have 4 VEGA 56 (3 ref & 1 peace of sh..) I was at 7500-7520h/s and now I'm at 7620-7630h/s with the same "summer" profile (CC:1340Mhz / MC:900Mhz) But I'm not sure all the speed up come from the duplicategpuid trick because I updated drivers (from blockchain to 18.6.1) and SRBMiner (from 1.5.5.1 to 1.6.6) at the same time.

on: August 12, 2018, 11:03:00 AM

Me

on: June 08, 2018, 11:21:38 AM

Quote from: Sx5000 on June 08, 2018, 10:50:09 AM Quote from: dingdongtobias on June 08, 2018, 10:24:48 AM sorry but this is similar to the ones like : "calculator shows 50% more profit then i get. why is that?" Not at all like this. It shows not the calculator, but the miner. The calculator does not calculate the profit, but the efficiency of finding shares. So this efficiency is lower than stated. Just want to understand why. If you are used to deal with everything superficially - your right. Forgive me, doctor Here you have 2 pictures with arrows, compare, can understand what I'm talking about .... Good point Sx5000 ! I'm waiting for Dok's reply..

on: June 05, 2018, 07:41:49 PM

Quote from: BroganBloodstone on June 05, 2018, 06:19:19 PM Quote from: jmigdlc99 on June 05, 2018, 06:16:08 PM Quote from: BroganBloodstone on June 05, 2018, 04:44:50 PM Quote from: AlexanderDumas on June 04, 2018, 04:43:18 AM Complaining for just 0.5%... If you do not like the fee just switch to something else. Oh gawd. Not allowed to have a different opinion now are we? It is just one users opinion, dev is free to listen or not. It is just feedback, not a complaint. Geez... I partially agree. I've been a fan of CastXMR as it was one of the first CryptoNight miners out there that was really easy to use with my VEGA GPUs. However, with so many new competitive miners out there that also have very active development (like SRB miner), a little decrease in dev fee would probably make me switch back to using Cast. Just sharing my 2 sats as well.. Glad to see I am not the only one thinking this. Was surprised to see those posts as I put my point forward respectfully. Cannot understand why anyone would get upset over it. Same here: I switched to SRBMiner a few weeks ago because of the higher hash rate and lower dev fee.

on: June 01, 2018, 10:07:22 AM

Vega 56 : 1460 H/s with SRBMiner (core:1407, mem:945)

on: May 26, 2018, 06:22:20 PM

Hi, It's not easy to fairly compare miners because we all have different hardware and software. I tested XMR-STAK and CAST-XMR SRBMiner works best for me: highest hashrate, lowest consumption, and it is very stable. I reboot my rig every other day or so, every time the hashrate is the same (between 7838 and 7855 h/s) Thank you very much Dok for this efficient miner!

on: May 17, 2018, 08:47:17 PM

Hi dok, I use V7 algo with 4 vega 56 V1.5.4 and V1.5.3 give me 7600h/s, stable V1.5.2 and previous versions give me 7850h/s, stable So, I stick to V1.5.2 Have you got an explanation for that ?

on: May 13, 2018, 04:44:00 PM

Quote from: doktor83 on May 13, 2018, 03:35:54 PM Quote from: niko2004x on May 13, 2018, 03:29:16 PM If started with Vegas miner does not create cached compiled kernels. Each start it compiles kernels again. Only zero-sized file with name '687F' is created. Anyone else got this problem with Vegas ? Yes, Same here with 4 Vegas. That's not an issue for me as I almost never restart the miner. Best CN miner ever! Keep up the good work Edit: I use V7 algo and blockchain drivers

on: April 28, 2018, 08:10:16 PM

Hi doktor, Your miner is great! Higher hashrate and lower power consumption compared to cast and stak 4 Vega 56 : 7840h/s (v7 algo), 690W at the wall , 100% accepted shares Very stable so far (24h) Thank you very much!

Pages: [1]