Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
So I can't reach the site , and I got a request to withdraw 20k of a currency .
" Unlikely hacked " ?
Hope you are correct.
|
|
|
I guess it's partly My own fault for keeping them there .
|
|
|
! Likely hacked I suppose ?
Wonder if it's lost ?
|
|
|
By default it is NVC at the time of the poll - because Nova is the next highest price , and thus the next most promising to pay you more if you are intending to mine and sell or hold , as of this poll -
So unless you are planning on eating Cryptocurrency - it is by definition at this time, the "most promising" -
LTC is at $2 that is a huge % drop - i think it will find support , but its a big hit -
Say what? Since when is higher price of a currency an indicator of its potential? Since when ? not sure exactly , I'll take a shot at it but , 1256 B.C. since then . Don't quote me but , it could have been before that .
|
|
|
Is there any feedback about any other exchnage for nibble?
Does anyone have any info on this?
|
|
|
Thank you .
Smooth transaction patient and helpful, recommended !
|
|
|
I have pm you Panth sorry for the delay don't hesitate to get back to me .
0.00007599
Still no sell ??
|
|
|
0.00006499
No I'm not him but I suppose that's hard to prove ha ha .
There is very large spread at the moment.
|
|
|
Looking for a seller at 0.00006199.
Thank you .
|
|
|
Are you ?
Ok well , in that case
I will raise my offer
0.00006199
Happy to buy all your nibbles , when you say "shitloads" how many are you holding ?
If you would like to do an exchange for many send me a message , that is not done on the exchange .
Just as a time relation aspect , for example if you want to move all at once . ?
|
|
|
Raised an order
0.00006099
Highest listed on the website.
|
|
|
I have orders on the Cryptsy.com exchnage website.
If people would like to sell to me i have orders in at
0.00005799 0.00005699 0.00005599
May change them , but happy to buy if anyone is interested in selling?
Thank you.
Will be adding more orders , so don't hesitate to fill them.
|
|
|
need that blockchain improvment but - i'd talk the Balthazar - he was working on a 3D with hamming code idea .
does he have a thread on 3d hamming? I didn't see searching the forum. I'd like to know what 3d hamming would gain. would a node automatically orphan bad blocks? would a node send bad blocks to the network for re-verification or just use it to drop bad blocks after checking the first few bits. I didn't think bad or corrupt blocks were an issue in the bitcoin network. Ha ha well we talked about it in pm , its a little outside my field but no so much looking at error checking the chain . More like keeping a mini chain and using the hamming to bit verifiy it, he was pretty much musing , hes not the only designer of NVC pm him and talk to him. So basically using a live mini chain and a verification block , i think , but talk to Balthazar..
|
|
|
4KMKVqNeDQGrccyk4ThT5yQDHqSoyszTuF
Anything that you could spare would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
Excuse the ignorance is this on an exchange ?
|
|
|
freedomno1
I don't have time right at the moment but I will address a few of your points and give you some pointers . You got some things right and some things wrong. I will use some references for your convenience.
Thanks for the replies .
|
|
|
You missed a very obvious centralization argument , because information in the market was near zero at the inception of bitcoin , how many individuals garnered the early blocks .
This is not an empty argument , a real world example would be if you had just discovered gold for the first time in history .
Using the gold argument again , perhaps you built your house with gold , maybe you believed it would be valuable .
Then as the market was a a small one and information low, there is a proclivity towards centralization or if you like monopoly .
Long term it may not have an effect , but I'm talking about new investors taking on information for an investment , I still rate buy ~~ hold.
|
|
|
Thank you for that information I will look though it , FX is a very confidence related vechical , so anything that effects confidence is of importance.
I understand about the exchange centralization but I don't see that as a large negative long term . Plus look at the recent incident, the price was flat to up on response.
Clearly the market does not see exchanges as a threat so far. They seem to be confident that others would quickly take up the distribution load. I agree.
My reference to ASIC is directly related to confidence , as is the risk reward price ratio .
For example , a buyer may look to invest in say Google , but they see Google as a multi faceted entity , confidence would be strong but they have a very high price also ,.
Bitcoin is a risk vechical like Gold .
People may tell you different and if you are close to the community you may believe different , but I can tell you that an approaching 4 Trillion USD Fed balance sheet is why bitcoin is where it is .
People are looking for yeild and protection , in a zero interest rate world .
I hope I can expand your outlook of global markets also .
|
|
|
Inquiry: What format are these points pertaining too Economics General Or technical
Any information pertaining to the overall investment entity. But focused on the mid to long term , so short term technical is not of huge focus. But if you have anything of note to add regarding a FIB or a MA that is + or - please send it though . But I would like it to be no shorter than a D1 candle or M1 candle . Otherwise its really irrelevant. And just noise.
|
|
|
|