I think this ICO is a fraud.
Not registered in the Swiss registry. To register a company name which contains 'Bank' is not possible without a solid license.


No thank you

ok
what about hydrominer? they don't even have a registration yet
Is this not alarming ?

You say:
I am a member of some blockchains groups that deal with "ICO Ethics" and "ICO Regulation" and we work hard to make our industry clean. For a simple reason - we want it work and we want the state and the regulators to stay out. But if scams and frauds are happening regulators and prosecutors have a very good reason to step in, don't they? Let's keep our environment clean and honest please and show no mercy with scammers and fraudsters.

So what is the difference between hydrominer and cointed in your uunderstanding?

BlueChipper
this is the so called Eröffnungsbilanz which of course can not show much as the Biz just started. I'm sure you know this . My impression is that your motivation behind your postings is not business related but more to harm the people behind Cointed.
Correct me if I'm wrong .
As you seem to be a good investigator in ICO's please provide me with some explanation about the business structure of an other Austrian ICO www.hydrominer.org
according to their Imprint https://www.hydrominer.org/imprint/  the company is not even yet registered , has no VAT nr , how about the balance sheet ?
Please  help me to find the balance sheet and business structure of the Singapore based TenX as well .

I mean, what does it tell us if people claim to have other jobs in other countries while they don't? In a public communication to potential investors? Who are the directors then of Cointed GmbH in Austria?
[/quote]

So what ?
They can be directors and shareholders in companies all over the world
Sorry this is not relevant

why should they be in HK ?
do you think the directors of Cayman /Singapore ICO companies are really living there ?
If you read the press about Tezos you will see that they are not all living in Switzerland

Well, at least Cointed has more to show than other ICO's where literally is nothing except a nice website and promisses.
I don't care so much about the legal structure ,who owns what and when etc
My personal impression is positive. Let's wait and see

You are not getting shares but you have to rely on the token issuer in an ICO that he actually has the assets he claims to have otherwise its a fraud

So if get this right: Every ICO without any assets -as they have just a good idea/knowledge , are fraudsters ? How can you prove that for example TenX will invest all the funds as explained ?
Ico investors are protected by law ? please explain this in more detail

Hi
I am a Cointed customer since 2016. So far I never had any problems with them. I always got what I ordered.
Because of this experience I invested in the Pre-Ico after checking the Whitepaper . I invested in other Pre-Ico's as well like TenX and Qvolta.
Why ? I am interested in a project which provides a solution for a daily use of cryptocurrencies. Exchange/Card etc
Cointed is -so far as I know- the first ICO with the Crypto ATM's.
After checking a lot of ICO Whitepapers and Business structures I came to the conclusion that this is completly irrerelevant as you do not get a share/dividend/voting right or whatsoever !
So I don't understand the useless discussion about Hong Kong , Austria etc. It is for my understanding just the place where Ico's are not regulated.(Singapore,Cayman's, HK )
Ico's are investments in a black box, take the risk of invest in something different. Maybe a share of Snap Inc which has no revenues at all since years!
If you have personal interest or revenge feelings stay out of the forum please !

completly nonsene