Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 02:23:11 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Other / Beginners & Help / Quick BBC Code Question on: May 31, 2013, 10:50:38 PM
Can someone provide me with the BBC code to make a linked and highlighted signature that complies with the Terms and Services of bitcointalk.org?

Thank you!
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Top 50 Most Trafficked BitCoin Sites on: May 31, 2013, 10:47:49 PM
glassuser: Yes, I changed the name.  No problem.

freedomno1: Thank you for your input.  BTC Trading Corp has been added to the list at #47.  Havelock Investments is not close to the top 50.  MPEx would be in the top 100, but not the top 50.

-- Watchdog
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Top 50 Most Trafficked BitCoin Sites on: May 31, 2013, 12:49:55 AM
It's official, the votes are in and Ripple is officially off of the top 50 bitcoin list.

glassuser: This made room for coingig at spot #50.

-- Watchdog
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Top 50 Most Trafficked BitCoin Sites on: May 30, 2013, 05:10:39 AM
bitcoinget: You are correct, bitcoinget and bitvisitor do qualify for the list.  Thanks for the input.

Xch4ng3: The list is based off of a combination of data from Alexa, Compete, Quantcast, and search engine rankings.

-- Watchdog
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Top 50 Most Trafficked BitCoin Sites on: May 29, 2013, 11:23:43 PM
Kupsi: Great additions to the list, I missed those somehow. 

They have been added.

-- Watchdog
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Top 50 Most Trafficked BitCoin Sites on: May 29, 2013, 11:06:29 PM
Tomatocage: Hopefully, you weren't referring to bitcoinwatchdogs.com?  The website is verified clean according to Sucuri, Comodo:

http://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/bitcoinwatchdogs.com
http://siteinspector.comodo.com/public/reports/14462397

kodo: btcquick didn't make the cut because the traffic was too low, although very popular in Canada.

raze: I'll add another vote for Ripple, it's now tied.

-- Watchdog
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Top 50 Most Trafficked BitCoin Sites on: May 29, 2013, 09:07:45 PM
Well, let's take a vote about Ripple being on the list.  It's currently there because they accept BitCoin and they have a bunch of traffic.  But, I'll let the forum decide.  Voting stops in 24 hours from this reply.  The current count is 2 for "no" and 1 for "yes".

bitcoinchecker: Those URLs aren't even close, sorry.

Fuzzy: I'll try to see what I can do about getting those in sortable columns.

coinpeculiator: The list is based off of a combination of Alexa, Compete, Quantcast, and search engine rankings.

-- Watchdog
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Top 50 Most Trafficked BitCoin Sites on: May 29, 2013, 07:03:31 PM
I believe buttcoin came in at number 53, sorry, you just missed the cut-off  Grin

-- Watchdog
9  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Top 50 Most Trafficked BitCoin Sites on: May 29, 2013, 06:54:28 PM
I've put together a list of the 50 most trafficked BitCoin sites, I thought people might find it interesting:

http://bitcoinwatchdogs.com/news/bitcoin-top-50-who-is-getting-the-most-traffic/

Please let me know if I missed one or screwed up the rankings in a major way and I'll fix it.

-- Watchdog
10  Economy / Gambling / Re: Baseball betting question on: May 29, 2013, 12:21:13 AM
It's good to hear when people are fair and honest...their business will do much better because of it...especially in a tight knit group that is BitCoin.  Reputation is everything.

-- Watchdog
11  Economy / Gambling / Re: The best Bitcoin gaming. on: May 28, 2013, 11:46:08 PM
In my opinion, build a real game that isn't a cheap knock-off.  Zero graphics, no player feedback, strange odds, and nothing new here....let's move on.

-- Watchdog
12  Economy / Gambling / Re: satoshidice and blockchain congestion on: May 28, 2013, 11:38:10 PM
I'd just find a different place to play.  SatoshiDice is slow and has high fees.  There are at least 3 other places to play that have lower fees and let you know what's going on.

When SatoshiDice realizes that they are losing players because of the slowness and high fees, they will change.

--Watchdog
13  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: [ANN] 700,000 Cash Deposit Locations in Brazil, Russia, USA - BitInstant on: May 27, 2013, 08:23:07 PM
If any members have used BitInstant recently, we would appreciate some honest user reviews here:

http://bitcoinwatchdogs.com/bitcoin-exchange/bitinstant/

Thank you!

--Watchdog
14  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Hello I'm new on: May 24, 2013, 06:27:00 PM
Welcome to the forum, nice to meet you cryptograd!

-- Watchdog
15  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: My Bitcoin experience after a few thousand transaction on: May 24, 2013, 06:22:49 PM
I agree. The confirmation time involved is too long.  Also, opening up your "wallet" takes way too long to sync.

The fun thing about BitCoin is that it's like the Internet started over again...now we need an Amazon BitCoin, eBay BitCoin, PayPal BitCoin, Google BitCoin website search, etc.  For those that establish themselves as the brand leaders, it could be huge later.
16  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Bitcoin Businesses and Developers, Let's Get Started! on: May 24, 2013, 06:05:52 PM
I am the owner of BitCoin Watchdogs - http://bitcoinwatchdogs.com where I review BitCoin services and websites.  Once I review them, the users are able to review the service as well.  Contact me if you would like your BitCoin service reviewed.  Keep in mind that I try to be brutally honest in my reviews, and the users will be as well.  Cheers!

-- Watchdog
17  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Trust System on: May 24, 2013, 05:58:28 PM
I believe a trust system for BitCoin is an excellent idea.  It's always important that a trustworthy individual or company is running the system though, I am correct?

A lot of the trust about BitCoin services seems to come from this forum.  It seems that this forum is THE trust factor.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!