 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
|
Ciao a tutti,
mi scuso in anticipo se il quesito che vi pongo è già stato risolto, ma non sono riuscito a trovare informazioni nel thread.
Ho letto l'interpello dell'agenzia delle entrate ma non mi è chiara una cosa. Per il 2017 come calcolo il valore dei bitcoin a mia disposizione? Faccio riferimento al valore in data 01/01/2017 o 31/12/2017, per inserirlo nel quadro RW? Preciso che non ho effettuato scambi Bitcoin-Euro durante l'anno.
Grazie infinite
|
|
|
|
Is this Tokyo thing important at all...I’m as close to ditching my NEM as I have ever been.
You should just dump it and spare yourself and the others the agony  Yep... If you want to dump and spare us your constant whining, bring it on! |
|
|
|
Is there audio of Borz answering these questions? The questions and answers sound so fake. I thought 777 was for people to talk to Borz, not blog some predetermined questions. Stuff like this makes me scratch my head about xby. The whole time Borz is portrayed as reclusive programmer, non native english speaker who let's CCR do all the business. Now all of a sudden Borz is talking about SEO, branding, and breaking down detailed marketing campaigns? This sounds like some generic filler written by the old random guy hired to write for XBY. I have a hard time believing that this is really borz giving these answers, and that these are actually the questions that the community wanted answered. Well actually CCR said that december's edition would be the last with only Borz answering all the questions: BORZALOM 777 As indicated on the Dec 7th edition, we would be doing a format change on the Borzalom 777 event. We did not go 100% in that direction yet but we are working towards this and perhaps how we have done this edition will be similar to how we will do them in the future. If you wish to review what was said, here is the excerpt: Moving on to 777
We have once again selected 7 questions that we are willing to answer but this will be the last time this session is done this way. In the future, we will have a dedicated team taking care of this and the questions and answers will come from them, based on where we are at that moment in time on our technical journey.
We will have things explained in layman's terms so that the masses can understand clearly what we are doing, without getting into the technical details that other projects need in order to take our ideas before we are able to bring them to market.
For the January 7th edition, we have 3 questions answered by the writer's team, 2 by CCRevolution and 2 by Borzalom himself. In the end, we believe the same result will be achieved because the point of all this is to answer some of the questions that the XTRABYTES community has. We still have Borzalom review these answers of course and he is actually doing his review while I write this opening statement. Thank you for your understanding and patience as we continue to move towards our goals. Anyway, since the first edition, Borz's answers have been edited for clarity. As for future editions, I personally would like to know which answers are given by Borz and which by the other members of the team. |
|
|
|
I am sorry to say I couldnt quite grasp the idea of locking xby coins in node  What does it means to coins stored in paper wallets or xchanges? Do that too get locked up and not be available for trade? Only the coins of people who want to run a node (and have enough XBY to do it) will get locked up - coins stored on paper wallets or in exchanges will be available and ready to trade. Exactly, only the coins of people who want to lock them up in their wallets and run a node will actually be taken out of circulation. Everyone are free to trade their coins when they want to. |
|
|
|
but what about the advice, do you think it's good? as someone whose been in this project for so long, you can understand the issues that I pointed out that can be fixed right? If raiblocks can do it and be successful, why can't XBY do it and be successful too?
and no, being attacked is pretty unprofessional of a project of this scale. Especially from prominent XBY members.
AMAs are always good, yes. But I don't think taking a fraction of what you said among all of your spam posts will help prove anything, especially why people should take their time to answer you politely. You cannot "attack" a project with your spam and not expect people to respond with the same tone (and then call them unprofessional). This is just ridicolous and sad, really. On your analogy, a bank employee would have all the rights to tell you to F*** off if the first thing he hears from you when you walk into the door is "THIS BANK IS A SCAM, EVERYBODY GET THEIR MONEY OFF NOW!" Don't you think? |
|
|
|
lol well believe what you will mapie, but let me ask you this. Do you PERSONALLY think the advice I gave was good, yes or no? I suggested an AMA, update advice and a few other things. Don't you think that would be good for the project? nothing else, focus on the advice, do you think it was good for the community?  And when the guy called it sh*t, didn't I post positives and even mention the testnet? (...also how is posting positives playing the victim...or even negatives? and I kind of am a victim since you can read how I was attacked heavily and all my suggestions ignored, heck even one person cussed at me and then sent me rude PMs). I try to help and I get attacked, I post my own personal opinion and I get attacked...why? lol (also the community is very rude at this point obviously, but I didn't spam this thread did I?) Want to know why you get attacked? See my post above. Simple as that. If you haven't got it already I don't think you will, ever. |
|
|
|
Exactly as investors we can do what we want with our tokens. So, to invite other people to the project (and increase the MC, that is the goal right?), we should have XBY move forward and be successful. But if there's a lack of clarity and uncertainty, don't you think others will simply dump them?
and think about it for a moment, since the beginning of this thread, have I shouted SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAM? haven't I only posted mostly neutral posts (aside from the btc thing in regards to the spammy guy) and defended XBY once? don't you think if I wanted to discredit the project by yelling scam, I would have done it already? so isn't that proof enough that i'm not actually trying to spam this thread?
haven't I simply been attacked, accused and battled with instead of anything remotely constructive being posted in this thread by prominent XBY members aside from the OP? Don't you think I was simply giving you and others an open forum to smash the FUD surrounding this project, but instead you would want to ragelash out at me? I could make a post that shouts "SCAM" in bold red letters the size of mountains, but that's no where near as bad as the way people in this community are behaving to legitimate advice.
Again, you're missing the point. People on here don't take you seriously because, again, we all know you opened multiple accounts to SPAM the xby ann. You changed your ways a bit to play the victim here but nobody is falling for that. |
|
|
|
...so mappy
Just another proof you are opening multiple accounts, am I right crazy8ball? Again, why would anyone take you seriously? |
|
|
|
I would lose a lot of money if you sold? Man, i decided to invest in xby back in May because I liked the project and I will hold until I see the finished product... I have no money to lose here.
You would be taken seriously if your account wasn't only created and used to spread fud on XBY. This is pretty obvious.
oh, no the point of my post was that the community has issues. there's a lack of communication and a cult mentality, the money part was because the other guy was spamming that I only wanted cheap XBY lol. But as you saw, I did make some positive posts about the project as well and suggest an AMA, so positive posts are FUD as well? if saying that the project can become something great is FUD if the problems were fixed...then what isn't FUD @aarell, the point of that post was that I didn't want cheap XBY, i'm not aiming to dox myself lol so, it seems when I raise both valid points, i'm attacked, and when I raise invalid points i'm attacked...well, that might be for you guys, but what about all the other people on the reddit forum concerned about the issues with the project who would draw comfort from your answers on an open forum? and if you sold at 2700 and it dropped, couldn't you just buy back in with more at a larger amount...what's the point of the hodl mentality? if it's self-gain that you're after and price, wouldn't that be the idea of not hodling? (at least in relation to your post, not anyone elses) have you ever considered that the point of these posts is to simply give clarity to investors? if I make valid and positive posts, the least you could do is agree or disagree instead of rage attacking me lol ---> Now now, don't take everything I said the wrong way. XBY can be a good project, but it has alot of problems. I have an issue with the shameless shilling and cult mentality, not the tech so much. It's people like CCR, Bikerlezno and Fatoshi (yup, he's added to my list as a shameless shiller) who only wish for sole gains from the project while promoting that mentality. One day the project may become one of the greatest in the world, but to do that, changes need to happen. XBY will need to have a working product (obviously), there needs to be realistic deadlines set, and if there isn't any deadlines, at least try to keep the community updated as frequently as possible and communicate any obstructions to the community. Like, take the "patent is in an IP firm" for instance. Break that down for a moment. Why not simply explain the delays or at what "phase" that it is at in the writing process. Like, why not say that lawyer x found that y is taking a bit of time due to research. Or lawyer z is helping issue y, but has a backlog because of x, so the patent may be done by z. Those are the small things that I meant. <---- not negative but gives constructive adviceI've never talked about the price of XBY nor shilled the project, I just try to help when I can. So I don't know why you ask me about the hodl mentality, I think I can still do whatever I want with my tokens. My main point, that still stands, is that you opened your account to spam the XBY ann. It's crystal clear form your post history, you cannot deny that. So why would anyone bother taking you seriously? |
|
|
|
|
I would lose a lot of money if you sold? Man, i decided to invest in xby back in May because I liked the project and I will hold until I see the finished product... I have no money to lose here.
You would be taken seriously if your account wasn't only created and used to spread fud on XBY. This is pretty obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
Anybody can see from your post history, and that of the other accounts (like candi and helpyngu) that were specifically created to spread FUD on the project and spam the XBY ANN, while asking for "donations" to stop, that your purpose isn't expressing "valid concerns" but only to spew on the project.
Normal behavior would imply asking questions and expecting answers: people on the XBY team addressed all of the questions on multiple occasions not only here, also on reddit and twitter. If you are not satisfied with the answers it is pointless to keep asking the same questions over and over again, you can either decide to leave the project and sell your XBY or just wait and see what happens.
|
|
|
|
We have all seen what this fud campaign is really about... why keep wasting everybody's time? I'll just throw this hear, not sure why it was sent to me but I still can't believe people try this...this is so 2013.  |
|
|
|
I'll just throw this hear, not sure why it was sent to me but I still can't believe people try this...this is so 2013. Ahah, this shows exactly how this guy (with his other 3-4 sockpuppet accounts) is "concerned" about us poor investors who cannot see all of the XBY red flags  |
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the response Borzalom!
Unfortunately i don't have the technical knowledge to identify the glitch. As percocet said, the richlist in the block explorer reports that the top 100 addresses hold more than 100% of the total supply, while the rest hold a negative amount of XBY (which is not possible, obviously)
|
|
|
|
What is going on with the XBY Richlist? You used to need ~400k to be in the top 100 but now it says you need 4m XBY to be in the top 100: https://blockexplorer.xtrabytes.global/richlistThere must be a mistake because as you can see it also says that the top 100 hold 103% of the supply! I noticed that too... is it possible that there is a glitch? P.S. Nice to see the news about the business registration! |
|
|
|
Going to be hard beating TRON...their bag holder I mean community is one of the biggest  Unfortunately yeah... I'm wondering how the price of Tron exploded like it did |
|
|
|
Just managed to watch Snappy's latest interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWjIOvJaVJQInteresting to know more about his background, I think he deserves a big THANK YOU for all that he's doing for the community. I disagree on one thing though, Bitcointalk is very user friendly  |
|
|
|
|
