 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
I believe NEM could be in for a big year in 2018. Their tech is better suited for business than ETH (as much as we all love ETH) and their superior security is going to attract serious business ventures, not just those looking to make a quick buck. 2 great examples are LoyalCoin and Qchain. LoyalCoin is looking to become a singular rewards points that all multi-national companies can use, rather than collecting many different points at many different stores. I know personally, I hate keeping track of many rewards cards in my wallet and I end up just not using them. This is a great use of blockchain technology to solve a problem and make our lives easier. You can read more about them here: https://loyalcoin.io/Qchain is a blockchain-powered native advertising and sponsored content sales platform. They want to build a suite of open and transparent applications that provide decentralized and secure solutions for digital advertisers, in-house marketers, content publishers. The advertising industry is plagued by distrust and fraud, which makes it ripe for disruption by the transparency and trust induced by the blockchain. Read more about Qchain at: https://qchain.co/ they recently released a statement with an update from their developers here: https://medium.com/the-qchain-blog/updates-from-the-qchain-dev-team-13f0ba08caf82017 saw the rise of many great companies launch on Ethereum, which no doubt was related to it's epic rise over the year, but as more legit businesses start coming up on NEM, I think 2018 will be the year you want to own NEM. I agree. It's a great time to be a NEMber. Qchain looks legit and I'll have to check out LoyalCoin. As more and more companies start building on NEM's blockchain tech, XEM is going to go way, way up. |
|
|
|
Can you give me link to the telegram chat?
https://t.me/qchainplatform Welcome! ) ...what is your guys price prediction in end of Q1 of 2018? Just to give me a view ...since maybe I value it wrong.
Well I need a cup of coffie and my magic ball...let me see...YES!! it will be at least x10 Got any winning lottery numbers lying around, too? haha |
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know if there is any more bonus period after the 7.5%?
|
|
|
|
I already participated in Dimcoin ICO which was built on NEM blockchain technology it was the successful ICO but not yet listed on Exchanges . Again one more Comsa which is also doing very well and getting huge investment on that . But Even i am not huge fan of NEM based technology . I always looking for Ethereum based ICO's .
Yea Comsa was a big one, but it's over now. Ethereum seems to be where it's at right now, but watch out, NEM is on the rise! |
|
|
|
as you think, two blockchains are good or bad? On the one hand, this increases the stability of the system. But on the other hand, it is possible, the difference in prices in different currencies for the same service. I don't know
I believe that different prices will not. If they do, then for a very short time because a market aligns all a price differences. If there is an opportunity to buy cheaper, and then sell elsewhere more expensive, then usually people notice it and use it. Arbitrage deals are very popular today. And why then already now the prices of EQC and XQC differ twice? Look.. 0.0002336 ETH to one EQC и 0.2174 XEM to one XQC. This corresponds to 7 and 3.5 cents. I think this is related to the price fluctuation of eth and xem. I think market will aligns all a price differences. I completely agree with you. It is rather a temporary phenomenon. In a free market this does not happen. And today, who understands uses it  Arbitrage generally exhausts itself in financial markets. This happens in all markets, usually just briefly. All major banks have HST software to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities, so this is not a unique situation here. But like I said, it solves itself. Every time you take advantage of an opportunity, the arbitrage payoff for the next guy is a little smaller, then a little smaller, etc until the opportunity vanishes. So it shouldn't affect many people. And if the correction is slow... then just buy the cheaper one. Good deal for you and helps to balance the market. All true. I think that prices of these two tokens will gradually converge until match each other. Indeed. As mentioned above, some divergence can be expected as the underlying values of ETH and NEM move around, so it will just be balancing depending on that. If ETH and NEM were relatively stable, EQC and XQC would also converge to a stable conversion rate. |
|
|
|
as you think, two blockchains are good or bad? On the one hand, this increases the stability of the system. But on the other hand, it is possible, the difference in prices in different currencies for the same service. I don't know
I believe that different prices will not. If they do, then for a very short time because a market aligns all a price differences. If there is an opportunity to buy cheaper, and then sell elsewhere more expensive, then usually people notice it and use it. Arbitrage deals are very popular today. And why then already now the prices of EQC and XQC differ twice? Look.. 0.0002336 ETH to one EQC и 0.2174 XEM to one XQC. This corresponds to 7 and 3.5 cents. I think this is related to the price fluctuation of eth and xem. I think market will aligns all a price differences. I completely agree with you. It is rather a temporary phenomenon. In a free market this does not happen. And today, who understands uses it Arbitrage generally exhausts itself in financial markets. This happens in all markets, usually just briefly. All major banks have HST software to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities, so this is not a unique situation here. But like I said, it solves itself. Every time you take advantage of an opportunity, the arbitrage payoff for the next guy is a little smaller, then a little smaller, etc until the opportunity vanishes. So it shouldn't affect many people. And if the correction is slow... then just buy the cheaper one. Good deal for you and helps to balance the market. |
|
|
|
|
I think it's mostly the volatility that scares investors. The information/technical skill required to start up scares users. That and the fact that many noobs lose access to wallets by accident and just lose coins. I guess you could say that you can lose cash, as well, but cash doesn't have the threat of getting hacked. Again, I guess cash can get stolen, too, but people fear the unknown. If you don't understand how something was hacked, it's scarier than getting mugged because at least they know how to learn from that experience.
|
|
|
|
|
If a coin pays a dividend is it automatically a security? The distinction matters quite a bit in the US. Or if the dividend is paid in more crypto, then it's not a security still?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the recommendations. I attempted to try all 3. Though I am excited about the project, BitDegree's MVP is underwhelming. I clicked around a little bit, but it was difficult to imagine really learning much. Hopefully, the existing skeleton is really filled out in the future. Qchain's demo I found easier to use and understand. Nice graphics and sorting features. Bankera's MVP looks nice and implies nice features, but it all required an account I didn't feel like registering.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like a lot of votes for Electrum. What's the benefit to Bitcoin Core? What resources does it take to host a node? Could you use an external hard drive for your wallet? Would that improve security as it can easily be taken offline?
|
|
|
|
I have MTH , I think this is hidden gems
What is MTH? Monetha project and that is the micropayment based project that aimed to be used the ethereum network and built its own micropayment structure, but the price plunged a lot right now. you can see now on the market Isn't literally every crypto currency already sufficient for payments? What does the Monetha project add? |
|
|
|
Everyone metabolizes alcohol differently. Men better than women, Native Americans are particularly bad. It's difficult to argue that alcohol has real health benefits. Think of it as a weak poison, that has a fun side-effect. It's harmful, but sometimes it's worth it  Ask any chemist and they'll tell you "the dosage makes the poison." In other words, enough of anything will kill you and a little enough of anything is fine. |
|
|
|
The purpose to life is to fuck bitches everyday. At least one of y'all is honest |
|
|
|
Very interesting! He must see something in the company. |
|
|
|
|
I think it's reasonable to surmise that men and women have had different evolutionary paths. Maybe we all started from the same bacteria at one point, but different species diverged a long time ago. More recently than that, but a long time ago, species developed sexual reproduction. Since then, men and women's paths have diverged quite a bit. No reason to think they are the same, so why you would assume they are (or even should be) treated the same? I mean, it's kind of a square peg, round hole situation. Obviously, not to say you want people disparage each other, but it's possible that men and women fundamentally have slightly different needs, so why not attempt to cater to them? In theory, that would improve everybody's situation.
|
|
|
|
Initial Coin Offering is useless now a day. They meant to dump after it was release. Very useless buying at ICO stage.
In fact, some projects offering their tokens through ICO will not give the tokens right away so that there will be no dumping after the release. Legit projects will carefully protect the value of their tokens or coins. But doesn't that just dealy a dump? How else do companies protect their token values? |
|
|
|
|
