I m having strange issues with one my mining machine with PhoenixMiner running on Win10. On other machines I have this does not exist as a problem.
No matter what I try regarding running miner in admin mode, changing drivers or whatever else it reports like this:

@doktor83 Just to report that 20536 port together with esm 0 did the trick for miningpoolhub. Thank you.

Yes I did but didn't help. It does not matter what to use as --esm parameter result is the same.
I have one interesting machine with Vega cards who doesn't work anymore with claymore for ETH because of known reasons. However all other miners fail on that machine when it comes to implementations of the straps except SRBMiner-MULTI who works flawlessly. Only problem with it is with connecting to miningpoolhub. It could be good if you find some time to take a look at this because I know that there are lot of users who have same problem. For me changing pool is not an option because miningpoolhub has certain features like autoexchange.

@doktor83 I m having problems with connecting to miningpoolhub. Other pools are working just fine. It must be that I m doing something wrong.

Isn't BTC abandoned by original dev?

@drays As much I don't like what is going on I decided to send Ucoin to online wallet.
I hate what is going on lately with all of those swaps.
It is ok to move to another algo with POW, not even that is smart but to moving to token that's worst thing that can happen.
To be independent and unique is what's valued on every project not just in crypto and here we are losing what we had.
Complete chain where we move on will eventually become expensive, slow and again dependent on another project.
Regarding economy and profit if that was a goal developer will see like many others before that supporting and working on its own project would bring much more than working for number of different ones.
Trick is to work on something for years and let it grow naturally.
Even if this swap become good thing and even if something good is created from all of this complete concept is lost. Remember, not all people are here because of profit, some of us are because innovative ideas.
When I remember how developer was good in building all additional features in the wallet and following toys that was my motivation to support this. To see how skilled he is and polite, talking nicely and calm to the community.
Naaah this is definitely step back...

What beginners mistake from my side. Shortcut I created was linked to old wallet version and never to version 1.2 of Ucoin so that's why I was unable to sync.
Now all going great here are two more working nodes:

Ah, good project who failed because developer was alone and same time accepting other projects. Too much work probably push him away from his own project. Every developer who started their own project will eventuality realize that he should stick with it instead going another road. Lately I have seen this number of times and I have even refused to do swap and let coins to die. This is just stupid, to swap unique coin and make it token like thing who will be dependent on some other coin's chain as a base. I don't see any purpose of this swap. It was better to let it die and create another Ether token not connected to this coin. I was holder here having about 300K of Ucoin, now I m probably still one of the holders. But, again, what is my motivation here to do swap at all. 

Can't sync wallet. Any other nodes than listed?
165.227.151.91
178.62.24.99
Those loses sync after some time unable to reconnect.

@cheatoshin0
There were always several trick games some people were playing on this forum. One was to discredit developer to buy cheap coins. Work behind the scene, allow some of those trusted pool owners to step up with answering questions here. Leaving this forum could be bad thing for the project.

What happened to GPU miner? Not legit? I was trying to compile it with CodeBlocks, no luck.

Why would you change algo. This is not good decision. First generation of ASIC machines will go to primary coins like PASCAL, after 2nd generation of stronger ASIC early miners with weak machines will move to PASCAL Lite and other coins supported by that ASIC. Also those who have just one or two ASIC miners won't stand a chance on PASCAL, so again they will start to mine PASCAL Lite to at least try to recover their investment.
Initially ASIC machines will make major influence on the coins price who will drop but once stabilized with ASIC hash power it will ensure more investments on the market.
Keeping this algo will show support for early GPU miner who collected PASCAL Lite over the time. After all everything will end up eventually that with strongest ASIC miner you won't be able to mine more than 1 PASL per day. If we remember what happened with scrypt ASIC miners then all is easy to understand. Now on every single scrypt coin you have high diff because people have lot of unusable ASIC machines who can't do much on Litecoin or any other popular scrypt coin but they didn't trow them away. They put them on first scyrpt coin they found who is not even listed on the market thinking maybe something will happen with it. On other side ASIC sellers much invest portion of money earned to rise the price of coin or algo they support to ensure that their ASIC will be sold in the future. After all of this PASCAL will worth up to 300USD, PASL maybe 50USD and then you will see lot of new coins with this algo. Again, from history, I have mined lot of scrypt coins when diff was lower than 1, now on same coins mined by ASIC diff is more than 300, price increased a lot over the time. Complete situation with those ASIC machines will be only bad for GPU miners who were here only for quick profit selling instantly what they mine but those are not real supporters of this project. Those who mined and hold are and they will benefit from this a lot. So think twice what is smart to do. PASL is 2nd coin in the line of coins supporting this algo, don't lose that place. Comparing Dash(Darkcoin) and his followers using same algo you can see ASIC influence and price ranges/hash rate they had over the time to the situation we have now with them when all is crystal clear about stuff I m saying. My advice is to don't touch anything but patiently wait.

Wallet stuck at 7 hours behind, block 23688. Now I have only 2 working nodes.

Yes that could be the reason.

Same on my side, like all is lost. Something is not right definitely. I just feel that someone entered with huge power, some bootnet or something and put in danger complete project.

Why do you bother with exchanges at all? Why would you pay anything to get listed? Work on the project and create some innovative ideas like you did with new algo. Work hard and eventually everything will be in right place. Maybe Polytimos is already listed where it should be, maybe this exchange will gain more trust. On every popular exchange we have right now we had just one coin who pushed it forward to the place where it is now.

Now I m able to login to yobit, let me confess, I did forgot my password
All is ok now.

Again I must write here. There is no replay from support for days. I can't login. Like my account never existed. When I try to reset password it says that this is disabled at the moment. But nevertheless I know that my password is good. No one is replying on my tickets, direct mails, or even PM here.

I can't login anymore for some reason. No reply from support.

@o48o must say that I agree, I was thinking the same thing lately.
First yobit is the exchange who is hard to reach so no matter what dev asks them to change they don't listen 100%.
We have situation where was swap for some coin they had listed, after developers contacts them they add new coin but don't remove old one before swap.
For example you still have VEC and VEC2 there.
No matter that there will be avalor, veltor will still be listed there, it will be still possible to mine and maintain.
Leaving veltor and making avalor was very bad decision by the team and now they are trying to fix this but instead they killed complete concept and lost community support.
By now veltor could have huge price so no ICO or in fact anything else would be needed. Right now situation is that team could only play short memory game hoping that everyone here will forget about what happened earlier. Best solution is that dev team made crucial decisions and get back to the supporters here and finally starts listening. Without community support everything will fail. After all veltor and avalor can coexist same way like dual blockchain, same way vericoin and verium exists but with some other approaches.