Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 05:39:17 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2
1  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware on: September 28, 2013, 02:27:22 PM
It's not like the discounted chips will ever ship. It will just be the same thing all over again.
2  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. refund tracking thread on: September 21, 2013, 07:15:40 PM
16 chips from batch 5.
I requested on 9/3 and got an email to redo my signing on the 12th.
Refund came through on the 19th.
3  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware on: September 19, 2013, 01:07:11 PM
Refund came through this morning. Thanks Steamboat!

EDIT:
16 chips from batch 5.
I requested on 9/3 and got an email to redo my signing on the 12th.
Refund came through on the 19th.
4  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware on: September 19, 2013, 05:14:50 AM
The uncertainty of the refund requests' status is indeed weighing on everyone's mind.  I've been tempted to re-submit the two refund requests again, but not sure if that would speed up the process or flag it as a duplicate entry.  The folks who did not sign correctly at least received a response one way or another.

True, but I still feel left in the dark wondering if it worked this time around. I really wish there was some kind of confirmation.
5  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware on: September 17, 2013, 12:46:39 AM
Mine was rejected the first time around (problem with the signing) and I sent off for another. Hopefully it goes through.
6  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware on: September 11, 2013, 01:09:22 PM
Is there any way to determine whether our refund form was submitted correctly with the signed message... or... do we just blindly wait for a refund and hope it appears in our wallets?

Yeah this is what I'm wondering about too.
7  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware on: July 30, 2013, 04:11:39 AM
Are they also waiting until all of the batch 3 avalons ship, to be fair to their own customers.

Annoying but understandable.

So they ship one of the chip orders and then tell everyone they're going to hold off on the rest? That sounds pretty stupid, but then again the majority of the asic companies have acted like complete morons.
8  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Who is leading the avalon asic chip board race? on: July 08, 2013, 02:34:02 PM
Terrahash is using the Klondike board as far as I know.
9  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 4,600 remaining on: July 08, 2013, 01:25:42 PM
steamboat,
I purchased chips from batch 1 and batch 5.
I have all ready ordered assembly for the chips in batch 1.
When do I need the order assembly for the chips from batch 5?
Thanks!!


Assembly orders were open for batches 1-5. Probably should've done it already.
10  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 4,600 remaining on: July 05, 2013, 01:02:43 PM
Batch #1 should be arriving soon now!

Excitement all over.

Have we heard anything from Avalon yet?
11  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ASICMINER Blade announcment predictions. on: July 04, 2013, 02:15:40 AM
I agree.. He'll try to get 25-30 (read: too much). Theres still a large number of people on this very forum who will probably pay 35  for one, even though i can just about prove that would be a poor investment.  Their numbers are dwindling a bit, but being good at math is, ironically, not a prerequisite for someone who brute forces sha256 hashes.




And the rest clamor for a preorder spot with no solid release date.
12  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ASICMINER Blade announcment predictions. on: July 03, 2013, 02:32:19 PM
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/ede0631876c66137ee06192f.html

New hardware starts on page 76.

2 blades, a 10Gh/s and 5Gh/s on July 10th. No price mentioned as far as I can tell.
13  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: A new ASIC is coming on: July 03, 2013, 02:14:14 AM
Seriously, why not wait till you can announce it and give real details instead of wasting our time. I wouldn't really want to deal with a company does stuff like this so half-assed anyways. Seems like BFL all over again.
14  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 715 remaining on: June 28, 2013, 02:31:29 AM
Overclocked or not, I just want to be hashing as soon as possible.
15  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 2,779 remaining on: June 26, 2013, 04:00:12 PM
Update:

BitPay is investigating our account for suspicious activity due to volume. We are speaking with them now and the gateway should be available shortly. The website has been functioning properly. All other concerns will be addressed shortly.

Thank you for your continued patience in this matter.

I could have seen that coming. I'm surprised there wasn't some discussion about expected volume when you signed up to use the BitPay service.

Not to sound like a broken record, but with this kind of volume (not surprising) I'm concerned about order queue placement. I've been trying to order since about 8:00 central

A few pages back, Steamboat said
"Chip purchase and assembly purchase have always been separate. The chips will be processed in the order they were purchased, and so will assembly. 
Each batch will be processed as a unit. Batch 2 chips will be processed before Batch 3, and so on. This takes effect only if the chips are delivered at the same time, which is a possibility but has not been confirmed. The assembly queue relates to individual units within each batch. Orders from each batch will not be competing with orders from another batch for their place in line. "


So all of batch 1, then batch 2, etc. If my math is right (50,000 / 16) then there is a max of 3125 k16s that will be made amongst the 5 batches that have been ordered or 625 boards per batch. Would queue placement be that big on a problem, seems like they'd be build within a week (when the time comes) if everything goes smoothly. Some chips are going to other assemblers so maybe this number is smaller.

Or maybe I'm completely off on all of this.
16  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 2,779 remaining on: June 26, 2013, 03:39:28 PM
any coupon available  Smiley

Found one on fatwallet Smiley

But I'm getting failed to create bitpay invoice at the end Sad

I used the "2weeks" coupon and got 10% off. Grin



If you didnt get the coupon from steamboat, I wouldnt fuck around...  it might mess up your order when it isnt paid in full.  Bump you to the back of the line, OR not get your order at all till its paid in full.  Steamboat has enough to do matching up our chip orders with assembly orders etc....  do you honestly want to fuck with possibly not receiving your miner over 10% off?  10% is prob all that he is profiting from your order to begin with, and for the headache that he is going through with all the logistics, he deserves that at least.

It was a joke, relax.
17  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 2,779 remaining on: June 26, 2013, 02:45:09 PM
Do we know what exactly the testing process is?
18  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ASICMINER Blade Sales [Temporarily Out of Stock] on: June 26, 2013, 12:27:47 AM
I'm betting on BTC25.
19  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 3,197 remaining on: June 25, 2013, 02:51:45 PM
Just got a test email Smiley
20  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Mining Hardware - Purchase Method Poll on: June 24, 2013, 10:05:29 PM
This poll is biased.

In my experience, a non-exclusive In-Stock Re-Seller is almost always less expensive than an exclusive In-Stock Re-Seller due to increased competition.

Yeah, no kidding. It's also a bit odd to put the dollar signs next to each option. It nudges you towards that option because you'll think "Oh, this one is cheaper".
Pages: [1] 2
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!