I don't understand why there is confusion. We are participating in a GROUP buy and in the opening post Soniq clearly states "Each share entitles the owner to 1/360th* of the BTC proceeds from the group of 12 KNC Jupiter's mining 24/7 till no longer profitable or sold (less expenses and management fees)". Since we got to 9 Jupiters, each share entitles to 1/270 of the BTC....
As participants we pro rata share the costs and the income, no matter when we stepped in.
The equality was for me to reason to step in.
while that seems nice as we receive a bigger share, why dont we let soniq clarify that.
The share might be bigger, but you do realize the income is also lower with 9 Jupiters compared to the income of 12 Jupiters ?
The shares might be bigger and the overall income might be lower, but the net to each shareholder per share should still be the same - ~11.66GH/s (from my understanding, without the extra 30% from the new algo).
Show Posts
. However, I've noticed that BBQCoin is displaying the wrong difficulty, and as a result is probably generating an incorrect figure. 
