 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
I did a bit of switching back and forth. I ended up concluding that my returns on easyhash.io were a bit higher than on the graftpool.online. That may all be down to chance though.
That is true, because graftpool.online uses PPLNS System to calculate your earnings. It basically meands that you need to stay longer on a pool, but your earnings are in average 5% higher. But do your math, just remeber that you cant compare "minging 2 hours on pool A and mining 2 hours on pool B" here. Cheers MiRei |
|
|
|
So I have two miners running on graftpool.online. Initially I had them on easyhash.io. And have been somewhat indecisive about where to keep them.
I am seeing some strange behavior from the easyhash pool though, and am wondering if anyone can explain. Yesterday I saw a pool hashrate of some 40 MHash/s while it also seemed to hit almost every block found on the network. But at the same time both easyhash and graftpool.online showed a network hashrate of some 18 MHash/s?!? How is this possible?
At this very moment easyhash.io just jumped from 1.5 MHash/s to 12.5 whilst apparently not affecting the total network rate. Though it somehow feels wrong, I am now considering to reappoint my miners to easyhash.io. But not if it is somehow damaging the coin...
I have noticed this on multiple occasions also. Very strange. I am currently moving from graftpool.online to easyhash.io due to the lower pool fee, but so far even with the network has rate not being much different I seem to be getting less at easyhash.io. Will mobitor it for a couple of days, if no improvement, I will go back to graftpool.online. Also, can anyone with certainty explain what the max cap for this coin is? I have seen two different figures and not sure which it is. I did a bit of switching back and forth. I ended up concluding that my returns on easyhash.io were a bit higher than on the graftpool.online. That may all be down to chance though. I do not have enough data to be sure just yet,it may well work out to be the case in a few days time. One would think it should be due to lower pool fees though. Will see how it goes and report back my findings here  Hey guys, Ill explain it to you. The "Network Hashrate" shown on pools is not a real-time value. Its calculated based on the difficulty of the actual block. The calculation is simple: DIFFICULTY / DIFFICULTY_TARGET (where DIFFICULTY_TARGET is always 120 sec = 2min for Graft). For Block #18383 that would be 3242439737 / 120 = 27020331 = 27 MHs. But try it yourself. The "Network Hashrate" is an indicator for "How much Hashingpower would be needed to find a Block every 2 Minutes". The Pools Hashrate on the other hand is a real-time value, that could be higher than the whole Network Hashrate. If thats the case, there will simply be more than 1 Block every 2 Minutes.... The Graft Blockchain calculates its difficulty over the average of the last 720 Block. If the last 720 Blocks longer than 1440 minutes (720 Blocks * 2 Minutes) the diff will fall. If it took less than 1440 Minutes the diff will rise. So if a pool put 40MH/s on a 15 MH/s Blockchain, there will me more than 1 Block per 2 Minutes. The diff will adjust, but over the average of 720 Blocks. Then, when the diff rises to a certain point, the pool stops putting Hashes on the Blockchain, leading to less than 1 Block per 2 Minutes. And the diff will fall again. Using this mechanism is not directly abusing the Blockchain, since its still a valid way to do it. But its putting his own interest bevor everyone elses. I hope I could clear things up for you and of course Ill be waiting for you on the awesome graftpool.online Cheers MiRei |
|
|
|
Thats awesome, thanks for your power  I have upgraded https://www.graftpool.online today to fit its success. It can now handle up to 20 MH/s! |
|
|
|
Thank you for the info!
Gotcha! The exchange - after ICO will be finished. Strange that there is no any info on their official page with any exchange name and the estimated date just to understand how long will I mine without possibility to do something with coins...
Thats not strange at all. You can only apply to an exchange with a living chain... And early birds just HODL! Cheery my friend MiRei |
|
|
|
|
With PPLNS Pools the initial start of payouts is a bit slower, but more steady. Thats absolutely normal. Too bad you are not happy at the pool.
|
|
|
|
No I am not a dev from Graft. The Wallet is build from the original Code from github. But as I said, I have build it, so its not an official Graft release. You can choose freely to use it or not |
|
|
|
Hey guys, if you want to mine on a fast and stable Graft pool, come to https://www.graftpool.onlineIf you prefere other choises, check the pdf in the Telegram Group |
|
|
|
|
I am really not here for the money. I am here to be a pool admin. And yes, of course I send the money out to all the miners two days ago. Here is the private Key of the wallet I did it with: Xun3qCsVtepBswGGfWeA8xFx3TUG6qhWdihVM2rEgNfGYGTG36JvA8kA3FJ1KiNpUuHPtWEPyJiKQH7 wqTBq68koBPonbN9AD9zhfywvAmQPaQAcVMoU6zLQzB5i12P8rjjMXjJZx94bXXxXXnoJGYihR3K5Fx BKSpZLBKdmZsfKQuLh7gJU427ANS (Its empty now, for anyone who would like to check.)
If you give me patchnotes, Ill think about them. At the moment, the only information I have got is, that the blockchain did a fork and I wanted to get the pool back online. I even contacted you on discord and told you so. I also have read through the forum to see whats the plan... but I did not find anything. I did not know that the Ultranote-Network is now a closed network for some time...
I am not against the network, just exchange information with me. So please, give me information I can work with and we will find a way.
|
|
|
|
|
The pool is fully patched and 100% compatible with the ultranote blockchain network. If you need any other patches, let me know. I dont have any information what you mean with "patch the pool". I am using the latest offical download (1.0.4-beta) form ultranote.org and all the normal availible APIs...
|
|
|
|
Hey you guys, I just wanted to let you know that https://www.xunpool.party/ ist now up again can mine blocks on the new fork. Have fun! |
|
|
|
Have you noticed ultranote.org'S XUN? Its a really nice alternative to XDN |
|
|
|
Its good that you can choose |
|
|
|
Hello Crypto-Pals, there is a new Ultranote Pool in town! Come and visit at https://www.xunpool.party! - PoolFee is 0.8% - All communications are secured with enterprise-grade-SHA256 certificates - Support for PaymentID payments to Exchanges - PPLNS mining systems - Set your own payment thresholds for normal wallets and exchanges - Hashrate-Charts for every worker - Payments every 20 minutes - E-mail notification if miners goes down Take a look at the beautiful active workers page: https://imgur.com/bVg6cybDiff is low, coins are cheap. Point your miners at pool.xunpool.party and get em all at https://www.xunpool.party! Cheers guys |
|
|
|
Hello Crypto-Pals, there is a new Ultranote Pool in town! Come and visit at https://www.xunpool.party! https://Ultranote.org is a new cryptonote based coin with an already impressive feature list: - Ultranote has a shiny, fast and stable GUI Wallet that will blow your mind! - Ultranote has a integrated messagingsystem build into the GUI wallet. - You can deposit your XUN-Coins directly on the Blockchain and earn interest. - Ultranote is supported with a great develmopent team. - PoolFee is 0.8% - All communications are secured with enterprise-grade-SHA256 certificates - Support for PaymentID payments to Exchanges - PPLNS mining systems - Set your own payment thresholds for normal wallets and exchanges - Hashrate-Charts for every worker - Payments every 20 minutes - E-mail notification if miners goes down Diff is low, coins are cheap. Point your miners at pool.xunpool.party and get em all at https://www.xunpool.party! Cheers guys, Michael |
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply. I just lowered the Fee to 1% and got rid of the unstableness  Thanks for mining |
|
|
|
IP Banning is activated at the moment. Do have a particular problem with banning ip? With AMD GPU mining? Just choose another miner. I had the same problem |
|
|
|
|
