A wannabe spin doctor (lamely at that) now passing for an intelligent cryptographer/mathematician (it's math...not maths). Where does it end? The real professional, highly-paid spin doctors (publicists/PR specialists, high-profile lawyers, etc.) would be offended.
You still haven't presented your counter arguments on the coin itself, if you think the presentation was so biased. You just sound like a wannabe philosopher who uses fancy words to distract the audience from the fact that you have no points to argue, other than it's a premine and the devs don't work for free. Is there a problem with wanting to get paid for the work you put in? The premine is locked and each year, some of it is unlocked to the devs - to me, that's incentive for the devs to keep them motivated in developing this coin.