 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2
|
|
Long story short I could have some really powerful Desktop PC's with 10Gig internet connections to rent out as dedicated servers. Compiling, Hosting nodes, Mining, Rendering - whatever use you might have for it.
Hardware:
Ryzen 3900x 12/24c CPU's
Currently 128GB non ECC Ram
10Gig + 1Gig networking. Facility has 100Gig internet and more 10Gig cards could be added
Lots of options for storage. They currently have dual really expensive Intel 900p's in them which I plan to not leave in there if not extra requested.
100€/Month - Nothing in advance, can be negotiated both ways depending on your needs. Includes everything ( I will limit the data @ 10Gig speeds included in this price somewhere but there will plenty even at this price. Gigabit connection will be truly unlimited. BTC/ETH/XMR
Located in Northern Europe.I could house them in a dedicated server space which used be a central hub for a local Telecom company. Meaning that massive speed and bandwith is available at the facility.
Obviously the machines are in a cooled space, on UPS power, redundant connections, as much remote control as possible and pretty much every service available.
For interested parties I could make it work from my end at about 100€ a month. For the right use case it's so many times cheaper than getting that horsepower from a established provider.
If you need something for highly critical operations,security certificates, AVX512 and 24/7 phone support then thats not on offer here. (English speaking competent support from on site will be available though if needed !)
Elaborating a bit this is not a money making project for me. I am offered a lot of 35-40 such machines bought for a failing design firm who didnt pay up. A lot of other high end hardware parts in some of them as well which is planned to be stripped and sold but could be included if needed. Ala Quadro gpu's, Some proprietary accelerators etc...
Could use 20 machines myself but would have to earn back the money from the other machines somehow too. Housing them wouldnt cost me anything extra than the electricity so there might be some value int this.
Anyone possibly interested ? Would aim for long termish and trustworthy people only. Lot's of flexibility and customizing options possible for right people Smiley If there is at least some interest I could have the machines running by the middle of November.
|
|
|
|
Well Loki cant show anything. XMR alone will bring 100x times USD value in daily rewards. Loki and Wownero together are traded about 2k usd daily. Thats ridic low. There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before. So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute. Still could go either way.... PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try. Meiby someone could test just for lulz  |
|
|
|
Anybody tested the new drivers and compute mode? Is it finally time to dump the blockchain drivers?
I'd of course be interested to see if anyone has tried them. Everything I've read doesn't seem to indicate much change for Vega https://www.anandtech.com/show/12147/amd-releases-radeon-software-adrenalin-edition"So in short, Adrenalin details nothing Vega-specific and there was no information disclosed on what Vega optimizations are coming when. The focus is on interaction and availability of the features within." http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-software-adrenalin-edition,5384.html"Vega owners won't see the Graphics/Compute switch in AMD's driver. According to company representatives, all of the features that benefit compute workloads are already enabled by default in Vega's architecture, so the switch isn't necessary." New drivers dont allow PowerPlayMods either so we are are stuck with the Blockchain one anyway if you care about power consumption  |
|
|
|
|
Needs work but promising (Y)
|
|
|
|
No point comparing the cuda performance. Tensor cores have 110Tflops performance. Thats like 5 Vega's Not an expert on algorithms but the AI workloads seem to be pretty different from crypto. First we would need a completely new mining sowtware anyway to use the tensor cores... |
|
|
|
So played around with one today. ROG Strix 1070ti with Micron memory.
You're running it around 125 watt level? Posting hashrates with no setting info is .... kinda useless. Yeah sorry I dint have a wattmeter between at that moment and ment to edit it in a minute later but then life happened  System idle is 29W and mining is 150-151w so around 120w. +699 memory 1847-1896mhz core with a custom curve. 70% power |
|
|
|
So played around with one today. ROG Strix 1070ti with Micron memory.  |
|
|
|
|
Has anyone found a solution how to use Vegas in the same system with Nvidia cards ?
Nvidia driver keeps tripping up the vegas after some time droping their hashrate to 1600h. Cant seem to find a solution....
|
|
|
|
|
You definitely need to do the powerplay if you are concerned with powerdraw. Otherwise it mostly even does not matter what voltages you set manually.
You cant get much more than 1950 out of them. I havent seen a reliable way to up the SOC clock with out significantly increasing powerdraw.
You can get 2080h with 1400mhz core / 1199mhz SoC / 1199mhz HBM with a 30%/50w increase in powerdraw. With some mods the cards would crash instantly without core @ 950mv. On some it will work with <900mv settings but it still actually draws 950mv.
I found that the extra 130h @ 50w and much higher temps are not worth it for me.
I know RednoWs reg worked on some cards with high SoC and low voltage but on most cards it will not work and I cant figure out what makes it work on some and not others....
Maybe silicon lottery...
|
|
|
|
So I'm bad luck then, I have 4 gigabyte vega 56. Overclocking SOC to 1200 not working stable, miner stops working, miner freezes, pc freezes. Tried setting those numbers from C0,D4,01 to 38,C1,01 (for 1,15Ghz) but no luck SOC stays 1200 (1999). Increased Voltage for both GPU and memory, it works like stable, get about 2% more h/s but get about 12% compute error, which I never seen before.
In the end I really dont even care about the extra 50h but I'm curious why the fck it does not work on Gigabytes. Identical cards. Works like a charm on Sapphires on high mhz and low voltages. Does not work at all on Gigabytes. On GB cards I can get the SoC to work on 1200mhz with my own reg files but then I am limited to 950mv minimum. What gives ? Did you use Gigabyte BIOS files? No' used generic AMD but they should be all exactly the same. Will try one tosay just to be sure. What limits your own reg file to 950mv? To be honest - I dont know. Just wont work below that. It's a mystery to me why Rednows works on some cards as well. I can tell what 30% of the entries in PowerPlay do. Rest is still a mystery and never had the time to really dig into it. If I get the time I might start to compare Rednows differences in the reg. Fixed the offsets today and also tried Gigabytes own bios.Still no go. Took a look at the bioses from different AIBs. They are actually different  Also BTW !!! The newest drivers dont include a PowerPlayTable in the registry. Kind a bad news for the long run  |
|
|
|
So I'm bad luck then, I have 4 gigabyte vega 56. Overclocking SOC to 1200 not working stable, miner stops working, miner freezes, pc freezes. Tried setting those numbers from C0,D4,01 to 38,C1,01 (for 1,15Ghz) but no luck SOC stays 1200 (1999). Increased Voltage for both GPU and memory, it works like stable, get about 2% more h/s but get about 12% compute error, which I never seen before.
In the end I really dont even care about the extra 50h but I'm curious why the fck it does not work on Gigabytes. Identical cards. Works like a charm on Sapphires on high mhz and low voltages. Does not work at all on Gigabytes. On GB cards I can get the SoC to work on 1200mhz with my own reg files but then I am limited to 950mv minimum. What gives ? Did you use Gigabyte BIOS files? No' used generic AMD but they should be all exactly the same. Will try one tosay just to be sure. What limits your own reg file to 950mv? To be honest - I dont know. Just wont work below that. It's a mystery to me why Rednows works on some cards as well. I can tell what 30% of the entries in PowerPlay do. Rest is still a mystery and never had the time to really dig into it. If I get the time I might start to compare Rednows differences in the reg. |
|
|
|
So I'm bad luck then, I have 4 gigabyte vega 56. Overclocking SOC to 1200 not working stable, miner stops working, miner freezes, pc freezes. Tried setting those numbers from C0,D4,01 to 38,C1,01 (for 1,15Ghz) but no luck SOC stays 1200 (1999). Increased Voltage for both GPU and memory, it works like stable, get about 2% more h/s but get about 12% compute error, which I never seen before.
In the end I really dont even care about the extra 50h but I'm curious why the fck it does not work on Gigabytes. Identical cards. Works like a charm on Sapphires on high mhz and low voltages. Does not work at all on Gigabytes. On GB cards I can get the SoC to work on 1200mhz with my own reg files but then I am limited to 950mv minimum. What gives ? |
|
|
|
@rednow, what are the default values with your mod? Can you share an overdriventool screenshot too ? My reg-file mod is based on vega54 liquid bios. Only changes are to set "greyed" low power state voltages to 900mV (905 or 910 if you are a silicon lottery loser) and increase SoC clock to 1200. All other settings are done in OverdriveNtool as I wrote before. I didn't touch gpu or mem clocks in power play at all. Took a look at your reg file and the offsets are completely different from what most are using. On my Vega64 it works like a charm with the SoC overclock while still keeping VDDC under 950mv, never seen that before On my vega56's flashed to 64 bioses it doesnt work at all. The offsets are all wrong and they will immediately crash at any Mhz/VDDC combination. Interesting, it's the exact same bios but they still act differently   Make sure your vega56 is flashed with vega64 LIQUID! bios Still hates it. The vega 64 works fine with air bios. Ok did some further testing today. Either I got super lucky with my Sapphire cards or Gigabyte outright sucks ass as always.... Works on every Sapphire card. Works on none of my Gigabyte cards. Using the exact same bios on all of them. Fuck, refrence design should be identical.... |
|
|
|
@rednow, what are the default values with your mod? Can you share an overdriventool screenshot too ? My reg-file mod is based on vega54 liquid bios. Only changes are to set "greyed" low power state voltages to 900mV (905 or 910 if you are a silicon lottery loser) and increase SoC clock to 1200. All other settings are done in OverdriveNtool as I wrote before. I didn't touch gpu or mem clocks in power play at all. Took a look at your reg file and the offsets are completely different from what most are using. On my Vega64 it works like a charm with the SoC overclock while still keeping VDDC under 950mv, never seen that before On my vega56's flashed to 64 bioses it doesnt work at all. The offsets are all wrong and they will immediately crash at any Mhz/VDDC combination. Interesting, it's the exact same bios but they still act differently Make sure your vega56 is flashed with vega64 LIQUID! bios Still hates it. The vega 64 works fine with air bios. |
|
|
|
@rednow, what are the default values with your mod? Can you share an overdriventool screenshot too ? My reg-file mod is based on vega54 liquid bios. Only changes are to set "greyed" low power state voltages to 900mV (905 or 910 if you are a silicon lottery loser) and increase SoC clock to 1200. All other settings are done in OverdriveNtool as I wrote before. I didn't touch gpu or mem clocks in power play at all. Took a look at your reg file and the offsets are completely different from what most are using. On my Vega64 it works like a charm with the SoC overclock while still keeping VDDC under 950mv, never seen that before On my vega56's flashed to 64 bioses it doesnt work at all. The offsets are all wrong and they will immediately crash at any Mhz/VDDC combination. Interesting, it's the exact same bios but they still act differently |
|
|
|
How are you guys getting sub 50C temps hashing 2k on Vega 56s? Are you blowing freezing air on them or something? I'm at 68-70C doing 2k at room temperature and with a 120mm 5 fan array cooling.
 6 card rig with about 10cm spaces with fans ~1800rpm and no additional cooling. No problems keeping it under 60 at ambient about ~19-20c. This rig pulls between 950-1050watts from the wall. If you are having temp problems your under volt probably is'nt working because @ 150W per card the temps should'nt be a problem. |
|
|
|
Ok. Not a noob user then I have been running HBM at as high as 1199mhz as well with the soc overclock but not getting 2500  What might change using a tv.... I know the drivers to make a difference between a monitor and actual tv but.... I happen to own the exact same tv but its fcking heavy and dont want start draging it to my rigs at the moment  |
|
|
|
so much hashrates has received today on a vega64 with regmod 1408 core, 1110 mem   Here is the system Asus p5b e8400 6GB RAM Sapphire Vega64 Nvidia 7300GS TV Panasonic TX-PR50VT20 plugged into Nvidia 7300GS But as soon as I connected system to the monitor, the h/s down to 2000. I once again connected the system to the TV and the hashrates back to 2500. But in an attempt to find the reason for the h/s fall, I can not get 2500h/s anymore. What driver and which regmod are you using ? 1110 mem clock is not possible on blockchain unless you really know what you are doing  |
|
|
|
I just had an idea...
Remember the trick we used to do to have the RX5xx working with the older drivers? I.e. Physically copying the content of the older driver's folder onto the new one, effectively tricking Windows into thinking it was using the new one?
Maybe something like this could be attempted with the Vega blockchain drivers too... I mean, if you have driver instability (devices disappearing etc) it could be worth a try...
I have been testing this also out by my self but cant find detailed documentation what exactly was changed in the blockchain driver. Possibly would want use the bare minimum from it. |
|
|
|
|
