Bitcoin is not news to me, but I've never really looked into precisely how it works. I've been researching Bitcoin for a few days now and came across the idea that transaction addresses should only be used once. However, I have also noticed that some developers that have websites which provide services like QR code generation DO have the same address listed for donation. Apparently it is feasible to have a script that generates a random address for each donation. So, is it just that these individuals do not care about the potential downside of reusing the same address to take donations or is it a non-issue for donations??
Thanks Mike
Why would it matter, really? I don't care much about what I have going on for my addresses, I don't know why there would be any issues related to having a single address used a few times over. Especially when it comes to things such as donations and the like. The worst case is you can see where the Bitcoin goes and how much they have collected in total, and that's not even that much of an issue. It's probably better for transparency anyways, but whatever.
Why do you think there is an issue with reusing addresses? I'm curious about why you'd think of that as an issue.
I think I understand a little better now after several of the inputs and some further reading. So, basically, these online wallets and exchanges and such manage your private keys and usually you don't encounter the private key but are only shown the public key (key and address essentially being synonymous, especially when talking about the public key and instructing someone where they should send the Bitcoin). By contrast, if you create a paper wallet you have access to both the public and the private keys and you maintain only the one set.
Yeah, I don't know, I was looking through the Wiki and it seemed like in an ideal world you would use a new pair of keys for each transaction. But perhaps that's not the realistic and practical scenario.