Are you able to compile this information into a FAQ? There are people who claim to have read through this entire thread and not found the answers to fundamental questions. If you could link them directly to the answers, I think it would be more convincing than to suggest that their queries have already been answered, without providing any specific indication of where or when.

No problem xl-edge, and thanks for being a good enough human being to offer your apologies  

Just to clarify my original post: I wrote that "The XFC representative stated that these questions have already been answered", and then went on to suggest, if that were the case, it would make sense for them to produce a FAQ page. In other words, I was reporting the statement of the XFC rep, rather than making any kind of a judgement regarding the accuracy of the statement. I have not read through the entire thread, so am in no position to comment. Anyway, not a biggie, and my apologies if the original phrasing was ambiguous.

Time will tell on this one and I certainly hope that one way or another the investors end up satisfied.

In case it wasn't clear, I was suggesting that the XFC representatives may want to compile a list of answers to frequently asked questions (that are indeed absolutely legitimate). To refer people specifically to this list rather than say "this question has already been answered" would be more helpful and save the average person from having to read through over a hundred pages of a discussion thread. I made no assumption as to whether or not you specifically had read all of the posts here. Furthermore, I was suggesting that 'someone on twitter' who has a track record of exposing scam blockchain operations has XFC on his radar. I made no inference as to whether or not he thinks highly of the project - the people who purchase his reports can form their own judgements about that. The inference was that if this project does turn out to be a scam, he may have an interest in bringing this to people's attention.

As a casual observer who has accumulated a few XFC by playing the free-roll games, I have no direct affiliation with XFC team, so I'm not sure why you would expect me to have the answers to all of your questions. My response was intended to offer a suggestion for how XFC might want to address the concerns of the people who have invested in their project. With that in mind, it seems a little hypocritical to question my ability to comprehend English. Nevertheless, despite your further insults, I don't think we're on opposing sides here - it seems that we both want transparent information in an accessible format.

Thanks xl-edge. Since this is not a fake account and you suggest a binary condition, I am apparently an idiot.

The XFC representative stated that these questions have already been answered. Given that not everyone will have the time or patience to search through previous posts, would it not be worthwhile to produce a FAQ page that could be linked to each time an issue arises that has already been addressed? This could include details about the owners/directors of the company, the developers, the registration details and business address of the company, etc. From the team's perspective, this should be a straightforward way to deal with the FUD without having to answer with the same questions multiple times.

Interestingly, this is a project that has been on Clif High's radar. Among other things, he is developing a track record of exposing scam blockchain organisations.

I appreciate that things take time and I'd rather wait for a well-developed solution rather than see a sub-optimal approach rushed out. Either way, the truth will out in due course, and what goes around comes around.

I am enjoying the free-roll games and waiting patiently for further developments on the exchange. I don't see any major cause for concern.