we need to face the facts, why vsx didn't became a "big one" coin yet.
Answers:
- The market are bleeding, no one has been scape, i repeat NO ONE.
- The goods Exchanges request a lot of money to list coins, see case CRYPTOPIA (wtf)
- The community are unstable, someone comes here and post a sh*t fud (fake news), ONLY a small percent goes to verify if is true or not, they are the real investidors, all other ppl sells your coins (dump the market).
- The community don't help. Again, the community... The people here just come to ask when LAMBO, but forget to help on build a better coin, with brainstorms, support new investidors. You need remember THE COIN IS DRIVES BY COMMUNITY.

Today many  ICO's, Tokens, POW/POS/MN coins are laucnhed.
Is hard to follow this market, yeah i know.
So,  why do you need invest on VSX?

I follow Matt since set/17. I can speak somethings, i guess.
- Devs VSX always are acessible, come see in Discord/Twitter/Forum/Telegram.
- Community are growning fast. I saw 2 Telegram group in first steps. The Officcial and Brazilian Group. Now we have many, we are a multcultural support.
- Platform partners are became true, last 2 month VSX was aggregate on many platforms, check it out, search here or asking on any group.
- Roadmap steps have been delivered or are being developed in due time.
- Always active. Come to check our activitys, join us on Telegram (don't forgot the coffee).

Remember, 10000 BTC was a pizza at the beginning, 10000 VSX can become your Lambo in the future xD

Because it's associated with white supremacist groups, that's public info, sorry to burst your tiny little bubble

it must be coincidence that you and serena call pepe the frog racist

oh my mistake john 

Hahahaha again calling everything you don't like Serena/Mojo

Very cute and original

I know exactly opposite of that

Why show it for free when I can make profit from it? What do you think I am? a newb?

Vsync was already added to cryptobridge but nothing changed.
https://wallet.crypto-bridge.org/market/BRIDGE.VSX_BRIDGE.BTC

That's just a cute way of yet again avoiding the point; can it be long now before your argument becomes accusing me of being mojo and/or serena? If you didn't mean to refute me, you should not have responded. But you did, and through your responses we have so far learned:

a) You have indicated that it is fine for the community to only have the ability to make pull requests, but not have any actual control over the project.
b) You have characterized dero as unfinished alpha stage software, and intimated that people should not use it like a bank, until "some years when everything will be stable with 0 risks and truly Open Source."
c) You demonstrate by point (b) that you do not understand that the blockchain is an immutable record, and that what happens with it now bears on whether people should trust it years from now.
d) You demonstrate by point (c) that you do not understand my initial point, which regarded the importance of being able to verify the code that was running on the network between the time the source was closed, and now.

This is what is meant when I say you have no understanding of blockchain; this, though it obviously escapes you, is what others can see by your words. And that rather than either agree or refute, you should instead point to a repo where I have forked a few projects, as though it says anything, rather than address the points themselves, says volumes.

The irony is that where I have not actually argued here against using or getting involved with dero, you yourself have inadvertently and voluntarily provided a few decent reasons why a person might do well to avoid it.