 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
Good to hear! I counted the .01 transactions and I came up with less than 50 so I invested. Its supposed to be a no lose situation, so one would be foolish not to invest! (unless op runs but I don't think he will, at least not yet) Nah, they have no reason to run. The current btc balance is: Total collected ฿0.00457671 |
|
|
|
|
I'm next in line to get paid! Come on people keep it rolling. I plan on re-investing, again.
|
|
|
|
Im on it!! Looks like its a Firefox issue.
That's why we have BETA!!
EDIT: Use chrome right now till I get it fixed.
OK.. fixed Chrome OK Firefox OK EDIT: It was jacked on Explorer too... but does anyone actually use IE? I mean for anything other than to get viruses on your local machine  You only use IE once. To download chrome/firefox. |
|
|
|
Confirmed, looks like the payouts were never deposited and the weeklyponzi guy is 5BTC richer. Looks like OP needs to add weeklyponzi.com and 24hourponzi.com as scams |
|
|
|
Take another little piece of my hearth baby! (i love Janis Joplin)  Spread the word and keep it going! I just paid 6 people! |
|
|
|
|
I was expecting many more entries this morning. Come on people, play so we can all make a little profit! I re-entered my winnings because I think this site is getting it right, I mean 3rd party escrow? No one else is doing that! The only way to lose is if you are one of the last investors. I really want to see this site prosper as long as the site keeps running this good.
Edit: It looks like there are over 20 bonus spots still available!
|
|
|
|
Just to confirm that I got my bonus payment why is there 16 pending. looks like most of these should be paid off by now
OP, please explain, your deposit address holds enough fund to pay next person in line Actually I was thinking the same thing, until I found if you hover your mouse over that long blue bar, it explains how much needs to be collected before paying out They must have copied weeklyponzi's approach, it was similar. In order to pay out the next person, the pool has to have enough to pay the user + the site owners + the transaction fees for both. Looks like the site takes 5% |
|
|
|
Re-investing my winnings. Surprised this hasn't taken off. I love it so far! https://blockchain.info/en/address/1PWdE3apgjHrdno28niL7Kj2t8bZoetiRZI want to see someone do this:
Request for "Over" payment - We need someone crazy enough to volunteer to overpay i.e. something larger than ฿1.5 so that people can see that the code really does kick it back. Scary eh? We will pay the first two over payments ฿.03 (~$10 USD) to try it.
|
|
|
|
What about next week? Why put each week on a different address?
Consider this, your Ponzi grows and becomes a billion dollar a week industry. Do you know what would happen, sure your supper rich, but that's about the time some hacker breaks in and defaces you site.
The defacing won't be obvious, just an adjustment to the code that displays the address. Perhaps they will simply steal the privet keys and disable the payment system.
That is a good question. I wish this was "my"ponzi. |
|
|
|
|
I'll say this looks promising, if everything they say is true. How do I know the escrow is the real deal and not just a ruse?
edit: Sorry, I just found / read the link.
|
|
|
|
Stay away from sites that are hard to audit, this is especially true of sites where you get a custom deposit address. If you'r not able to see everyone eases deposit, how can you be sure of anything? If you'r asked for a BTC address, it's vary much likely a scam.
Operators can take any public key script from the deposit's input and use it as an output, just copy the output the BTC came from. Simple!
If you are using a web wallet "STOP"! These are no good for the bitcoin network or ecosystem. blockchain.info wallets are OK, make sure to have backups.
Changing the address for each round serves little purpose, as in the above 7dayponzi.com, this is likely a scam.
Hard to audit? https://blockchain.info/en/address/1BETAx2kRjuQaTWRBxzcohKPz6XNDQat7WCome on man, you gave great arguments of how good weeklyponzi.com is. This just seems like off the cuff complaining. |
|
|
|
Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] 61+ BTC Input + Altcoins - Automated - 125% Return An interesting aspect of this game is that one could view each block as a round, making a deposit when there are unconfirmed deposits makes no sense. Wait till the deposit is confirmed and then you'll be able to deposit first in the next round.
If you wait a little longer to see the payout transaction, then we can ensure that the balance of the account never grows to 5BTC like what happened to weeklyponzi.
I agree the site is nice but I think a downfall is the amount and length of time they hold the coins. Can you not see the graphs? https://blockchain.info/charts/balance?address=1Nine9waAcCQtDsAqM9XwqLnLSsgg1ij2oThere is a spike of 5BTC, but coins are not held. The BTC is paid out once the balance can cover the max bet (1.6BTC). What you see in the ledger are N9N coins(TM), they are like monopoly money. Ah ok, now I see. |
|
|
|
Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] 61+ BTC Input + Altcoins - Automated - 125% Return We need to help spread it, this is best game of it's type by far!
Seconded. Many of the problems that exist in other games are corrected by this system, here is a short list. 1. Start race. There are no set times were it is best to make a deposit. It's not possible to commit a false start, for example. 2. Deposits are recorded when they are confirmed, unconfirmed transactions are not in play. No more double spend or zero fee attacks. 3. Transaction zapping. Many other games zap all the transactions to start a new round, with this game you can re-post your transaction and continue playing. 4. Stable deposit address, many/all other games change their address every round. Who is to say the website may get hacked to posts attackers private address for the next round. 5. Fee and Payout transactions are combined. This saves BTC with lower mining fees. An interesting aspect of this game is that one could view each block as a round, making a deposit when there are unconfirmed deposits makes no sense. Wait till the deposit is confirmed and then you'll be able to deposit first in the next round.
If you wait a little longer to see the payout transaction, then we can ensure that the balance of the account never grows to 5BTC like what happened to weeklyponzi.
I agree the site is nice but I think a downfall is the amount and length of time they hold the coins. |
|
|
|
Why haven't you listed weeklyponzi.com / 24hourponzi.com?
It was fun while it lasted. Stay tuned for a possible v4 late 2015 or early 2016.
Thank you for making WeeklyPonzi and 24HourPonzi the successes they were. I know the system wasn't always perfect, but many people profited immensely during the lifetime of the sites.
- j (admin of WeeklyPonzi and 24HourPonzi)
These are listed on https://excaliburponzi.com/ as DECOMED. Was the bitcoin lost to double spending paid back to the users? What happened in the end with the 5 bitcoin that was transferred into the fee wallet? I really used to love both these sites until I lost 1 bitcoin due to timer discrepancies, which I know you and I have discussed before. |
|
|
|
|
Why haven't you listed weeklyponzi.com / 24hourponzi.com?
|
|
|
|
Anyone know how to get in contact with the owner? Are you the owner Cheako?
My deposit was not listed on the latest run. I submitted the bitcoin exactly when your timer hit 0. I would at least ask that you return my investment, if not include me in the current game. It was not my fault you're timer was nearly 15 seconds out of sync.
Here is my transaction:
Bitcoin Transaction 290aec1f4e403d8c272a49a4b05381971f0350871a3f68b155ab3038b1cb74f2
I can't believe it, this is way beneath my abilities... What a waste of my time. However it's clear that "YOU ARE AT FAULT FOR THE COUNT DOWN TIME BEING WRONG." The site uses this JS tool that in turn calls this browser function to get the time. http://andrewu.co.uk/clj/countdown/http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_getmilliseconds.aspThat is the clock that was 15 seconds off was that one on your own dam computer. A real coder wouldn't have had this issue. It is idiotic to assume everyone's computer is going to have the same time. |
|
|
|
|
