Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 06:07:57 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust ratings on: May 10, 2018, 07:14:25 PM
Which supposedly bounty did I cheat, check my other accounts date last login, it is clear they are all abandoned before they received negative feedback. I accepted that I did the error and abandoned all accounts, this is my original account which has some reds because I bought accounts in 2016. Now we are in 2018 and I only have this account active. I think it is an unfair trust rating , anyway I am used to it now.

I guess for buying forum accounts some years ago. Maybe he should tag Lauda and others who have been caught doing that. Haha, can you imagine that?? Equally applied standards from DT?? What a joke. The trust system is rotten and corrupt. Wink
2  Other / Meta / Re: HI THEYMOS Why a small group of DT Members & Mods are trying 2 protect Scammers? on: April 06, 2018, 05:40:23 AM
We don't need to address this because you're a Quickseller alt.

Move along now.
3  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: hilariousandco, Mitchell,Vod,Ognasty Bitblisscoin.com could be a scamsite on: April 05, 2018, 11:59:49 PM
Yes, the former is true. Just don't go back to your old habits, I don't need people visiting the hospital. Smiley
I'm trying to follow along with my popcorn in hand. What did you mean by this, Lauda?
It has a secret meaning; have fun with your imagination though. No, it is not a threat of any kind as insinuated before by mr. Nasty, and to which I have responded here:

Is this some sort of threat?  Pathetic.
Nope. Next time use words.

I see the angle that you tried to make there ("Lauda the witch threatening to put OgNasty in a hospital"). Sorry, won't work. I don't resort to physical violence, unlike *some*. Roll Eyes

Maybe, maybe not.

I would say that you guys calling zeroaxl's family (particularly if a listed number) carried an implicit threat of physical violence. Especially after you used a supposedly neutral third party to goad him into doxxing himself with his passport. "Pay us, otherwise we know who you are, who your family is, and where you live." That's violent mobster level shit. That's the most disgusting part of that story.

...Lauda's crew for fear of retaliation..
There is no such thing and there was never any retaliation on anyone.

I saw you retaliate against someone for criticizing you very recently.

On 2018-02-04, user VirosaGITS (previously 40: -0 / +4) opened a thread titled "The forum would probably be a slightly better place without Lauda's nonsense."

On 2018-02-06, Lauda left negative feedback for VirosaGITS [??: -1 / +4]. Lauda claims that VirosaGITS was pulling a "self-escrow" scam. But if you look at the context and chat logs, he said that he was willing to use an IRL escrow (as opposed to paying high forum escrow fees) if payment up front on the basis of his positive trust and trading history was unacceptable. Neither of these things is untrustworthy. Neither of them are a "self-escrow" scam. If you read the chat logs, there is literally nothing indicative of a scam or intent to scam. There was literally no agreement made and no shadiness to speak of on VirosaGITS's part. The rest of Lauda's feedback is meaningless unverifiable blathering about "false claims" and "slander."

As it turns out, the user VirosaGITS supposedly "scammed" was trying to pull an escrow scam himself.

Yet, Lauda's negative trust rating of VirosaGITS still remains. It seems like a very clear cut case of trust abuse triggered by VirosaGITS's thread about Lauda.

Unsurprisingly, no one else tagged VirosaGITS because the notion of doing so was ridiculous. Yet no one on Default Trust was willing to speak against Lauda for this retaliation, either. No one wants to bring that kind of wrath on themselves for obvious reasons.

I commend OG for having the balls to stand up to Lauda.
4  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: hilariousandco, Mitchell,Vod,Ognasty Bitblisscoin.com could be a scamsite on: April 05, 2018, 11:15:24 PM
Ya, you know me.  Broke as a joke barely getting by in my shanty.  Clearly my motivations must be financial and not trying to make this place better by getting rid of the trash that is flooding this forum with ICOs and turning away newbies from Bitcoin by giving them an awful first experience investing in scams.
Yes, the former is true. Just don't go back to your old habits, I don't need people visiting the hospital. Smiley

I'm trying to follow along with my popcorn in hand. What did you mean by this, Lauda??
5  Economy / Reputation / Re: Recommendations for additions to Default Trust on: November 15, 2017, 06:44:25 AM
Nope.

Xanis made multiple bids on a forum account. Several screenshots and links provided. Xanis is tied to your wallet through blockchain analysis.

What do you mean by "Nope?"

So that's who you are. Roll Eyes

Who?? Why so vague?? We're all friends here. Smiley
6  Economy / Reputation / Re: Recommendations for additions to Default Trust on: November 15, 2017, 06:33:44 AM
I am also curious to know why you are making this a reason to veto zazarb's position on your trust list, yet you leave Lauda on your trust list when he had dealt in accounts in the past.
I have not. Keep wasting your time with shills and making up lies snowflake.
Very strong evidence has been posted that suggests otherwise.
If your evidence is a shitpost from the past, then you are very much bamboozled. You don't even realize how pathetic and butthurt gobsmacker must have been to dig up graves, and then read 2-3k posts in order to find nothing.

Case in point: zazarb is not a fit candidate.

LOL. You tried to buy a dozen accounts on two occasions (that's what was dug up at a glance)........and a year later you are talking about how you "can easily live from" posting with 4-5 accounts in sig campaigns.

I havent gone through Xanis's posts at all, I just checked your most obvious wallet. Bitcointa.lk, Bitcointalk.to and Hollila are a fucking bitch to parse and I don't have the time or energy right now to deal with it atm. Theyre archived anyway.

I just saw the way youve been negging lots of peoples accounts for the exact same behavior you engage in. I just wanted to start a conversation. Don't worry, snowflake, my account is intact. I also noticed you were online all day, post count dropped instead of rising though. It's nice to see that you squirm just like everyone else. Kiss

Placing bids != actually buying something. Furthermore, even placing bids != intent to buy something.

You tag people with negative trust for both actions. So, it's okay for you, but untrustworthy for others?? Is that how things work??
7  Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone on: November 14, 2017, 11:12:51 PM
I suppose this one won't be added to the OP Roll Eyes
It will not as it is a worthless connection. You'd realize this if you were smarter than a baboon.  Roll Eyes

In this thread I will list known alt accounts of users.

Are you listing "known alt accounts of users," or arent you?

You only list accounts that aren't your own alts???

Theres plenty of users on that list who don't have red paint. Why are your alts exempt from the discussion?

Oh look who has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar  Grin Anyone going to whip out the red paint now? Oh wait double standards and everyone giving blowjobs to each other. At least spit some out before you swallow next time. DT is rotten to the core. Hahahaha.

As expected. Lauda has tagged people for just mentioning buying/selling accounts. No proof required, we are all supposed to take Lauda's word for everything!!

I'm sure there will be no reciprocation here. But it's good to point out the hypocrisy from time to time. Wink

Don't verify! Just trust Lauda!
8  Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone on: November 14, 2017, 08:29:21 AM
Accounts connected: Lauda, Xanis

Lauda nuked the Xanis account in July 2015. It previously had almost 3000 posts.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0159d14a67570b3d/addresses
Lauda: 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg10896717#msg10896717 / http://archive.is/XzVUk)
Xanis: 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942 / http://archive.is/tikrd / https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv)

cd40260d5a57d13eb5d2a4582ef036346f2a66ff948f7ba4ef981795bd64b3ef
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD as change address)

3a5f78995c9b93c6192d93fabc4bf0534e27a9b781d42626330d0b6cce41a6d7
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD -- provably links Lauda to 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (Xanis)

As I said, Lauda nuked the alt account. But the Xanis address was archived on bitcointa.lk (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942). It was also archived by a Bitcointalk address scraper on Github (https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv). A cursory glance through the addresses archived by the scraper shows that they are quite accurate. Pick a few at random and see for yourself.

Miscellaneous notes:

Lauda/Xanis buying forum accounts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320328.msg3435067#msg3435067
http://archive.is/2TBKt


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=292662.msg3334977#msg3334977
http://archive.is/qFolm


But why would Lauda be buying forum accounts? The answer is obvious:

https://bitcointa.lk/threads/primedice-highest-paid-signature-earn-up-to-2-4-btc-month-by-posting.168569/page-465#post-7616384
http://archive.is/4D76m


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216854.msg3005096#msg3005096
http://archive.is/zcn2G


"Signature managers against spam?" Oh, the irony!

There is a non-zero chance that Lauda has used (and continues to use) his Default Trust status to facilitate these account trading and signature spamming practices.

The fact that Lauda has been outed as an account trader while simultaneously heading up the SMAS initiative and being a signature campaign manager himself raises questions about a conflict of interest. In any case, please see the feedback Lauda has left for other users. Specifically, Lauda has extensively tagged users with negative trust with the following feedback: "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming." I agree, and by Lauda's own standards, Lauda is clearly untrustworthy for engaging in these practices.

I don't have the time or energy to look further into this now, but Xanis had thousands of posts in the Altcoin sections. I believe that both accounts were being used to scam giveaways. I've recently archived giveaway entry posts made by Lauda (those which haven't been deleted yet) for further research. Unfortunately, as Xanis was nuked, we only have quotes and archives like bitcointa.lk to work from. C'est la vie.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!