 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
|
+1 aznjack31 Helped me out quickly and trusted me.
|
|
|
|
|
aznjack31 did indeed hook me up and I would trust him in the future. This thread can be locked if you want. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Looking to buy 1 Bitcoin @ $13 USD. I can pay via PayPal, working on getting Dwolla verified, or Chase transfer (it's free if it is another Chase account right?)
Reply here if you are interested or PM me I guess.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Normally, as a Global Mod, I don't get involved in things like this that are administered by the local mods, but they seem to have neglected this for several days.
I bumped EMC out and replaced it with Yourbtc.net. If I screwed up doing this, let me know.
I mean if anything bump BTCmine. Nothing against them personally, but they don't need to be stickied because I do not think they allow new members. They are also approx. 122 GH/s where EMC is approx. 153 GH/s. |
|
|
|
Why nope? Support it with logic...
Support your statement with actual people. Also, you STILL have not given an actual logical reason that makes sense (to anyone but yourself) for wanting it.
LOL @ this being the one part of the post you chose to ignore. |
|
|
|
Also, I bet you will attract more miners if you show the number of shares since your last block found.
Nope, still nope. Who cares why I want it.
Actually, it does matter for a number of reasons. Two that I can think of off the top of my head are 1. Using one pool's stats to do evil on another pool and 2. Screen clutter/confusing other BTC Guild users. Many would wonder why round shares are being reported in a pool where round shares DO NOT MATTER to ANYONE (but Eleuthria) because of the PPS payment system. Also, you STILL have not given an actual logical reason that makes sense (to anyone but yourself) for wanting it. I pay fees and so will more miners.
Nope, still nope. |
|
|
|
I just need the share count to differentiate BTCG from a slow or bad luck pool and thus slower payouts...
TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ...yet would be a win win for the all or us...pool picks up hash rate and I (and others like me)
Nope there is no one like you. You are SPECIAL! |
|
|
|
Yeah how do those other sites have a bot to announce stuff?
I will see what I can do to add multiple pages to block history, although I'm not sure that would fix what you want out of the Prop Differential column.
It means it's in the 6th percentile for long ass blocks, as in 94 out of 100 blocks are shorter than that. Also, the % at the bottom in totals in incorrect, as it's still using the old formula of +/- percent.
Not sure. I really don't have that much experience with IRC. I was just using what I said as an example. I had not even seen that row before and was just wondering if it was a true total (for all time), which you already said, it is not. Does that mean that block 164 uses a different method to calculate luck than block 163? For block 165, does 76.15% mean that 76.15 out of 100 blocks are longer than that? |
|
|
|
|
Also, block 164 says 6% for luck?
|
|
|
|
We actually have an IRC channel, but no one uses/used it, so it's pretty much abandoned I think. It's on Freenode under #EclipseMC if I recall correctly.
For the HTML block stats page, it's strictly for what you see. If you want all stats, you can export to CSV, which is a link at the bottom of the page, or the API has all blocks.... I don't think I limited the API to the last 50 blocks.
Ah, that is too bad no one uses it. You could try to add it to some places on the website/OP in this thread so people know it exists. Maybe if the average hashrate goes up a bunch, more people will be mining and hangout there. I know other pools have channels where a decent amount of people idle in. Some also have bots that announce when a block is found, next difficulty estimates, etc. I find you can usually figure out answers to questions faster with instant messaging rather than forums or email. If the "Totals" row is only what for what you see, it is a somewhat worthless stat. So what if for the blocks on that particular page the DGM scoring method has given me +2% extra than proportional if the reality is that in all blocks I have participated in I am actually at -5%. Maybe I am the only one who would get use out of this, but having multiple pages for older blocks would be cool. At this point I don't think it would be that big of deal because it would be like four pages max. Or you could do one long page with a link to it around the Export CSV. |
|
|
|
If there's any feature(s) your want, please let me know and I'll see what I can do to accommodate them.
*haven't forgotten about the teams thing.
Maybe an IRC channel? I would personally like that more than mining teams, not sure why people care about mining teams, but whatever. IRC could be useful for simple questions like on the block stats page, are the totals for all-time or just for whichever blocks are currently on that page? Is there a way to go back further in history than what is on that page? |
|
|
|
So I made some adjustments as you mentioned, Meni... I'm not sure that clears up any confusion, just seems to be trading it for different confusion.
So we have a 95% block, which is good luck, but a 13% block which is bad luck. Seems like we should still have some sort of positive/negative list as to if we are under or over expected shares (difficulty).
I agree, but I do like the varying shades of green/red. |
|
|
|
One of the problems with the luck column is that there is no upward bound on "bad" luck, whereas there is a negative bound of 1% (or 0% if it takes exactly one share to find a block) - you can only have a -99% luck factor, but you can have a theoretically infinite + luck factor. So the color visualization is kind of misleading... if anyone has any ideas on how to improve the luck factor display, I'm all ears.
You could make it so that every +50% or +100% is a new darker shade of red. Then at some point (maybe like +400%) the dark red just turns into a small nuclear explosion. |
|
|
|
|
ckolivas site seems to be down for me right now.
EDIT: tried again two hours later and all is well.
|
|
|
|
|
At the moment EMC is well over 200 GH/s. I have never seen it break 200 and I hope it lasts/keeps going up. Would be nice to have a little less variance sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
This might have already been said, but under Pool Reward Method you forgot DGM and SMPPS, which happen to be my favorite methods.
Also, are you planning on editing and maintaining this? There are quite a few instances where you talk about specific features of a certain pool. However, these things often change and you would have to come back in and modify a sentence here and there.
|
|
|
|
|
Block 121 says it took 3 days 17 hours and 47 minutes? Shouldn't it be 6 hours 20 minutes and 24 seconds or so?
|
|
|
|
Your stats will show a lower prop differential boo!
This has probably been explained somewhere in the previous 50 pages of this topic, but what exactly is the prop differential? |
|
|
|
|
Are block stats messed up for anyone else?
|
|
|
|
Just joined your pool, connected to the pacific server and was getting 15% rejects, changed to the us server and haven't had a reject yet. Something wrong with the pacific server?
Yeah, there's some routing issues with that. Use the US server for the time being, it's much more reliable. I need to find a new host in Australia or Asia somewhere but so far everywhere I've looked wants a ridiculous amount of money for a colocated server. Maybe you should see what host https://ozco.in/ uses? |
|
|
|
|
