This guy is trash talking me and making false accusations because I revealed his trust abuse attempt. (which is linked to a legendary account used as the "dev" of a token.)

I have sold maybe 2 or 3 accounts in the past. I was taking them as collateral for loans. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=977216.0)
They were put to sale when the lender defaulted.

I was naive enough to believe they were used to enroll in Signature campaign, and haven't imagined that scammers would want them to perpetuate their thefts.
When I became aware of that, I immediately stopped considering them as valid collateral.

Anyway, we might not have the same definition of "numerous" ..

There is another eventuality, if "3" is numerous for that guy, then I'll blow his mind by telling him that after 3 there is 4, then 5 and 6 .. Which is twice as enormous as 3.  

Well well. And those are our 'Hero's' discussing forum ethics? What a sad display of arrogance and contempt to outsiders this is.

Woke up to find someone looking to pump their ann thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2473151.msg25337405#msg25337405) and some people looking to be hired.




Do you think these users deserve negative trust?

Also someone else started their service for bumping anns

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2473513.msg25339793#msg25339793

Seems a bit dodgy aye?

The moment I start exposing The Pharmacist, you emerge out of nowhere and give me red tag. Hmmm, that s really convenient, isn't it? Your explanation for that neg tag is that I am "Stupid spammer". That is really strong, justified evidence for the tag, ha? A good one, I have to say, I did have a laugh when I saw that. Maybe you should add childish in between or DANGEROUS. I d suggest DANGEROUS!

Dude, I already told you and your alts, feel free to neg tag me as much as you want, actually, try to neg tag me more without reason, especially using this king of explanations, it s fun! I ve got nothing to lose here, I don't do and will never do sig campaigns and red tags can't hurt me, especially these unjustified ones. This makes me dangerous, ha! In your mind, I should be immediately banned cause I might expose false Bitcointalk guardians like you, who are actually account farmers and scammers, how they intentionally sabotage competition for their signature campaigns and hurt new users. I know there are really honest people here who keep assholes and scammers away of this forum, they do it for free and I salute that. But, there is this other, fake kind.

Cause if you were anything else, I do not see what would be your interest in my discussion with my good old friend The Pharmacists.

About my feedback to you, I think I ve citied references from your waste library of neg tags you have received in the past. They do sound quite legit to me. As my friend The Pharmacist would say, I strong BELIVE they re legit!

So you just keep playing your game my alt buddy, I already came clean with what I did. Let see whether you can afford to come clean as well. The clock is ticking, tic,tac,tic,tac!

Have a great day!