Latest posts of: buro9

Hi all, I've just started mining and am getting what would appear to be some strange numbers given what others are posting, I just want to validate that it's not some bug or something is wrong and that it's actually working as desired.

A dump from the command line:

Code:



>rpcminer-cuda.
exe -user=xxxx -password=xxxx -gpu -aggression=14
Client will start 1 miner threads
Work will be refreshed every 4000 ms
1 CUDA GPU devices found
Setting CUDA device to first device found
Target = xxxx
Loading module bitcoinminercuda_11.cubin
CUDA initialized
Done allocating CUDA resources for (16,16)
Finding best configuration step end (16,16) 1813ms  prev best=9223372036854775807ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (16,32)
Finding best configuration step end (16,32) 914ms  prev best=1813ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (16,64)
Finding best configuration step end (16,64) 490ms  prev best=914ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (16,128)
Finding best configuration step end (16,128) 335ms  prev best=490ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (16,256)
Finding best configuration step end (16,256) 331ms  prev best=335ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (32,16)
Finding best configuration step end (32,16) 956ms  prev best=331ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (32,32)
Finding best configuration step end (32,32) 490ms  prev best=331ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (32,64)
Finding best configuration step end (32,64) 334ms  prev best=331ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (32,128)
Finding best configuration step end (32,128) 331ms  prev best=331ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (32,256)
Finding best configuration step end (32,256) 330ms  prev best=331ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (64,16)
Finding best configuration step end (64,16) 939ms  prev best=330ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (64,32)
Finding best configuration step end (64,32) 483ms  prev best=330ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (64,64)
Finding best configuration step end (64,64) 332ms  prev best=330ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (64,128)
Finding best configuration step end (64,128) 329ms  prev best=330ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (64,256)
Finding best configuration step end (64,256) 328ms  prev best=329ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (128,16)
Finding best configuration step end (128,16) 933ms  prev best=328ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (128,32)
Finding best configuration step end (128,32) 483ms  prev best=328ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (128,64)
Finding best configuration step end (128,64) 329ms  prev best=328ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (128,128)
Finding best configuration step end (128,128) 329ms  prev best=328ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (128,256)
Finding best configuration step end (128,256) 327ms  prev best=328ms
Done allocating CUDA resources for (128,256)
6759605144 khash/s
11503132515 khash/s
12118605140 khash/s
11352202147 khash/s
10592490938 khash/s
11374405002 khash/s
12092100194 khash/s
10122935165 khash/s
12085704851 khash/s
10960440978 khash/s
12213746319 khash/s
12179113316 khash/s
11705168381 khash/s
12204549939 khash/s
12103577788 khash/s
10324611659 khash/s
10190482336 khash/s
11422309222 khash/s

I've got an Nvidia Quadro FX 1800, so figured it was safe to try the high aggression. Prior to adding the aggression I was only getting avg. 12000 khash/s, but now I'm getting those ridiculously high numbers.

It's only pegging 1 CPU core too, so I'm averaging 12% load there and the system is as responsive as if I were doing nothing.

Is this all for real? Are those numbers real?

And if it is for real, how long would it take to calculate a block?