 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
|
Is it possible to start now or is it too late?
|
|
|
|
It seems that the bounty manager is too busy to find the time to give me even a one line answer, so I don't know if I'm out of the campaign or not. This seems to me a very poor way to manage a campaign. I hope - for you all - that he we'll have the time to take care of the whole situation and that what is written in the trust summary of Shooter is not true. If I don't receive an answer, I'll take off the signature and... that's all. We don't have any right, so this is all we can do. But... good luck to every one. I sent a PM to the bounty manager last week, but I didn't receive any answer. Don't I have the right to know if there are problems, as every week I do my duty? What do you think? Is it normal? Hello!
I took a look of the spreadsheet, and I see I was redmarked as "Flooder".
I don't understand exactly what it's means.
May be, because I make all messages in one time? But in this case, I don't think this can be a problem, as they are all in different threads.
Btw, let me know: if I did something wrong and I'm out of the campaign, there is no more sense I still write for you.
If the problem is that you prefer a different rhytm, let me know, but I checked on the rules and I didn't see anything.
Have a nice day
|
|
|
|
|
The merit system worked perfect for its real purpose, that is to freeze the situation and to allow high rank to keep their position of power.
About spam and shitpost, the only result of the merit system is that now people create more and more accounts just to make more and more shitpost, just to earn some cheap money aven at jr.level.
IMHO, not a big result. But nobody cares.
|
|
|
|
I sent a PM to the bounty manager last week, but I didn't receive any answer. Don't I have the right to know if there are problems, as every week I do my duty? What do you think? Is it normal? Hello!
I took a look of the spreadsheet, and I see I was redmarked as "Flooder".
I don't understand exactly what it's means.
May be, because I make all messages in one time? But in this case, I don't think this can be a problem, as they are all in different threads.
Btw, let me know: if I did something wrong and I'm out of the campaign, there is no more sense I still write for you.
If the problem is that you prefer a different rhytm, let me know, but I checked on the rules and I didn't see anything.
Have a nice day
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I'm a little confused: some time ago I was so stupid to argue with Lauda and I received a red trust because I SUGGESTED that to give undiscriminate redtrusts pushes people to have multiple accounts. Ok, you can check on my profile if I deserved this, if you don't have nothing better to do. Btw, I saw this thread, were lot of people innocently say that they make 5, 10, 30 (!) campaigns, and of course this implies that they have at least the same number of accounts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3027397.msg31366107#msg31366107is this correct? In this case why I have a red trust? It's not correct? So why THEM have not a red trust? Let me know, something is wrong somewhere. But a direct question (YES/NO) is it allowed to have multiple accounts? |
|
|
|
|
I'm not an expert, but I see that mining - to be profitable - need a lot of hardware and big investments.
I'm very skeptic that you can have results with just a cellphone.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, just a technical question: why in this thread the red trust doesn't appear? Just curious.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no point in this discussion: I was redflagged because I was in the wrong thread; I tried to argue with Lauda, and he made me "an idiot", he said I've "a backwards morals" and he gave me more penality flags. Oh, well...
I suspect that in a face to face meeting he would have a very different attitude, but this is not the point.
I only want to say that my argument was - and still is - this one: if you make undiscriminated redflagging, just by your arbitrary opinion, without a clear criterion, anyone will feel insecure, and will start to open more an more accounts just to go on with campaigns, with an explosion of shitposts.
I didn't say that I "find it acceptable to avoid ratings with alt accounts", I just said that this is what will happen, and there is an evident confirmation.
If you want to stop shitpost, and get rid of all these "3rd world cancer", as you defined the rest of us, a very simple solution exists: take off signatures from any profiles and let people make promotion only on other channels.
Shitpost will stop immediately and your forum will be the elitistic club that you all are dreaming about.
Is this opinion "shit"? May be, but I'd like to hear at least some logical explainations and not insults (and may be, some more redflagging...)
|
|
|
|
Of course there is no sense to discuss with self proclamed gods. As you can see, I just said some simple things, evident to everyone, and this is what I received: more red rates from Lauda, with this motivation: "User with completely backwards morals; sees campaigns as jobs; finds it acceptable to avoid ratings with alt accounts. I wouldn't trust them or let them anywhere near any of the campaigns run by me. " Clap clap, your are a real hero, you are the boss, and you are in power. Forgive me if I didn't understand that people here actually don't make campaigns to obtain money, but because they are very idealistic people who promote new coins because they have a philanthropic attidude and share with the manager a common vision of a bright future for the humanity. To live is to learn. Btw, I'd like to have a civilized discussion, because I really think that we can do something to improve the quality of forum, but it's impossible. The only results are insults and bad rate. May be now I'll receive more penalties or just a final ban. I understand, this is the ultimate sin here, to argue with a legendary. Btw, Mr. Lauda, you are so fast to judge people, but it seems that you too have to care about your reputation, even you think you are untouchable. Nothing in life is forever. Just a little sample - between thousands of bad reports - of what people think about YOU: What can I say... Well known trust abuser who were trusted with powers which she never deserved or will deserve.
Manipulating the market, stealing people money with pyramids/Ponzi schemes.
Also lets not forget she was part of crypto-rainbow scam and many many more.
This user also claims she's against account sales when she clearly sold many accounts here.
Ignorance/scams/abuse...
People are not blind and they will realize this is the most biggest scam artist in this forum and because the owner don't give a fuck about scams, she will continue to run here and will never stop.
Never ever trust this individual with anything or you will be doomed like many in the past were.
You were warned.
Account farmer and account seller hiding behind the false pretenses of a 'good guy'. Do not believe this individual and avoid at all costs.
She is an internet bully / extortionist. Will leave you negative trust for no apparent reason and just for satisfying her ego. I hope you someday get a life.
Fake and defamatory reputations without proof of evidence. Your reference is a thread that has a list with my thread on it. No where on my thread does it ask or hint for a tip, and doesn't show my BTC address. Thanks for the warm welcome to the forum fucking retard.
It just shows what kind of sick person you are. Do not trust this user in any circumstances.
Spreads false information and gives negative ratings to other users whose opinion he does not agree with. When a negative rating is given to him in return he apologized and promised to remove their negative feedback if I did the same. After a while he sneakily inserted his negative feedback back in hope that I would never notice, but I did. So here's a permanent negative feedback to this troll.
I have reason to believe this user may be the person involved in hacking Crypto-Rainbow account which is one of the devs from DeepOnion, one of Laura’s competitors. Left a negative feedback yesterday and seconds later Crypto-Rainbow hacked account logged in after several days of inactivity to delete most positive posts. People like this do not belong in Bitcointalk, it is a shame. Also, I know Laura will read this and will leave negative feedback on me. Guess what? I don’t care about my seller feedback, I stopped selling here years ago. 
This user seriously screwed and abused the Escrow system along with Owlcatz. They sold coins on consignment to users outside the community. Do NOT TRUST the Escrow System unless It's MJ or OGNASTY. Long Live NASTY Fans!
Farming accounts, engaged in account trading, and uses alts to take advantage of signature campaigns. I can not condone this type of behavior.
abusing trust system - Only a proud man with his power as a Legendary
Scammer and blackmailer, should be banned from the forum
....
....
....
just check the profile
.
|
|
|
|
Well, you can destroy weeks or months of someone work. Of course, you decide that it's not work but shit.
If you see posting as work, then you are an idiot that is in need of a permanent ban. May be I'm whiner, but for sure these are not bullshits: the only way to survive is to have multiple accounts. Am I wrong?
Trying to avoid a negative rating by hiding under a different alias just confirms that your original rating is valid and warranted, regardless of its description or intent behind it. Well, when someone starts to use insults as arguments, there in no more point in the discussion. Btw, just to end the discussion before my permanent ban (you see that you have the power?) I appreciate that you probably are a lucky bitcoin millionaire, good for you, but lot of people here try to make signature campaign just to earn something, so this is work. If you don't like this, change the rules and don't allow any campaign. Nobody tries to hide, but you can't use negative trusts (made to identify scammers) as like/unike system. Actully, THIS could be a good idea, a like/unlike system on specific post: if I write a bullshit, I receive a precise negative feedback. This would be not only acceptable, but also appreciate. But if someone don't like a post of mine (my english, my nick, my opinion, whatever) and I receive a global negative rate, this seems to me an useless nonsense. And, for sure, it's not good for global quality. Moreover, and this really I don't understand, there is no way to repair this rate. If I'm not permanent banned - we'll see - is there something that I can do to repair the situation? Just to know. "'This, to me, is the ultimately heroic trait of ordinary people; they say no to the tyrant and they calmly take the consequences of this resistance.'" Edited PS Just a more question: you - and other Legendaries - have TONS of negative feedback, with really heavy accusations (that of course I can't judge) but it seems they don't affect your rate. It seems that only positive ones count. nThis seems vey unfair to me. How do you feel if that comment affected your rate, and - for example - blocked YOUR campaign? |
|
|
|
-if they don't like something you do they can destroy you without any explication
No power -> Can't really do anything. I understand that this kind of power can be addicting (I'm just expecting to be banned forever, just as a demonstration of power), but if the aim - out of ego celebration - is to improve the content on the forum, you are all deadly wrong, as all you will obtain is that everyone - knowing that can be banned in any moment just by an arbitrary opinion of someone - will create more and more account, and of course more and more shit post.
Classic bullshit from a whiner. Can't you come up with something creative? Well, you can destroy weeks or months of someone work. Of course, you decide that it's not work but shit. May be I'm whiner, but for sure these are not bullshits: the only way to survive is to have multiple accounts. Am I wrong? Btw, ready for the Gulag. |
|
|
|
Those are not rules, they are guidelines. There is a huge difference between those two words; a difference which any decent English speaker should be aware of. Whining won't really help you, shitposters. Thank you to call me "shitposter", I'm relatively new here and from the last messages in this thread now I understand that: -Legendaries are almighty and right by definition -They support each other a priori -They have godlike power to judge people -if they don't like something you do they can destroy you without any explication I understand that this kind of power can be addicting (I'm just expecting to be banned forever, just as a demonstration of power), but if the aim - out of ego celebration - is to improve the content on the forum, you are all deadly wrong, as all you will obtain is that everyone - knowing that can be banned in any moment just by an arbitrary opinion of someone - will create more and more account, and of course more and more shit post. I don't think it's good result, but, as you all are right by definition and we are all piece of shit, we need to accept it. Oh, well.... PS Why don't you create - as in any dictatorship - a rule that says that someone can post something only after your approbation? So the forum well become a good copy of NorthKorea or Stalinian Russia. |
|
|
|
I'm gonna explain it simple and plain but angry, this actmyname really abuse his trust rating to give a red trust to someone that are shit poster base on his perspective/professional view but my point here is. Firstly I'm not spamming any thread and I'm not running out of time to post because I'm not into any campaign yet red trust. Second This guy want to give red trust for any reason he find suit to person who will help those he gave a red trust. Lastly This guy loves giving red trust maybe this guy have some serious mental disorder and soon It's on me 'cause every time I think about my red trust my head itch this guy gave me a stressed not just a red trust. This guy isn't reputable and couldn't count on based on trust because this guy is not reading any article about the service section at first page I'mma insert it here read this paragraph maybe you could turn back what you give to me in my own conclusion I'm not fit to be spotted have a read What counts as an unsubstantial or unconstructive post? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1684035.0 what gives you an idea giving me a red trust I'm not into any campaign and you not give a freaking fuck**g friendly advice And Foremost all of knowledge I should give this actmyname an advice though you not give me any, find yourself reading for the self chosen ignorance. I'm not gonna stop until I've been heard by someone who's willing to help us Absolutely. He took a thread and gave a negative trust to practically everyone: we are all shitposter scammers! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=465017Please note that in the rules writes clearly: "- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts." https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664So, HE broke the rules!!!!!! Negative rates are to semnalize scammers, not "shitpost" by your arbitrary point of view. And of course, we can't do anything; I hope there will be an intervention from a moderator. |
|
|
|
actmyname gave me a Red Trust with a reference https://archive.is/lugCY my fellow bitcoiners could you please look at the reference this guy is giving to me and also look at my previous post see if I'm a shitposter or not after ranking to Full Member this is what I get what a shame. Could you also look at this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2664813.260 after I post here that what is happen what do you think does this caloy06 report me that I'm a shitposter or this triggered me to actmyname that I'm also a shitposter Well, he took a thread and gave a negative trust to practically everyone: we are all shitposter scammers! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=465017Please note that in the rules writes clearly: "- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts." https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664So, HE broke the rules!!!!!! Negative rate is for scammers, not for people that you don't like. What can we do? Now, I'm expecting he will use his godlike power and ban me forever. Clap clap clap |
|
|
|
Hello bounty manager, I joined the signature campaign: Brunus Januensis, jr.Member https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1379636In the form there is no question about the starting post number, so I put it here: 34 (actually 35 with this one) Just in case. I hope this will be a good collaboration, I'm waiting for your approval. Have a nice day! |
|
|
|
|
