On coinmarketcap you can use logarithmic with a base of 10.

The idea is to use a natural logarithmic y axis, base of e (2.718...)

For some reason my picture won't preview, sorry about that.

I think we should also use the data of the 2011 bubble. And what i am wondering is why are we showing the y-axis in base10 Logarithms, while we are studying the natural adoption of bitcoin. In that case, shouldn't we use the natural logarithm? (e^x)?
In excel, (sorry did't get tradingview to do it for me) i managed to show a logarithmic y-axis with the base of 2.7 (couldn't get closer to 2.71828....) And when drawing lines on there it looks like we are just getting started :-) My subwaves are probably a bit small...

Hey look, a tx highway that nobody wants to use :-)

2 points for originality

I'm trying to compare the hashrates, to get a better sense of bitcoin dominance. Instead of looking to the bitcoin dominance in the market cap which has it flaws.


I'm wondering do i need some kind of correction factor for the Ether Hashrate?

*
Data from:
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-btc-eth-bch.html#log

This 12k$ is one though cookie

Feels more and more like a trap

Is this it?

it feels like Meh....... not a trap??

Weekly MA20 ~ 9k

Although i like the BTC dominance chart of Coinmarket cap ( https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage )

I'm wondering if there is such a chart for the BTC dominance of its network hashing power compared to the other altcoins?