Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Cubis core.
The blockchain introduces us to our lives a radical change from how we see the money, blockchain solves multiple problems like the centralization of actives and the confirmations of itselves, and is for that reason that the blockchain has also been the reason of multiple polemic or controversies from its use, for example having governments censoring it and the press attacking the technology related to these topics.
Cubiscoin comes as an answer to solve these problems related to the confirmation of transactions in a faster way! safer and more friendly with the user, there is no need for an expert to use our technology.
This is not cogent thought, it is random word salad.
|
|
|
Network weight is 25 million, how can this be a new coin??
10 percent! premine, and you know they've got that ticking 99% of PoS rewards right now.
|
|
|
I have a feeling this is the last chance for people to get a XAP MN this cheap. Price is rising steadily.
|
|
|
Hi, you can find a complete guide to setting up a masternode here: https://github.com/fathertime100/apollonI have 2 questions: 1) How much minimum is required for XAP to participate in the POS? (1000 ..... 2000 .... 3000 coins?) 2) Where to find instructions for Masternode in a bundle: Windows wallet 25 000 XAP + Linux wallet 0 XAP ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) As I understood from the installation instructions, a wallet with coins for Windows should be deployed on VPS !! ?? And one more question, there are a lot of master programs that are successfully launched, they work but they do not get a reward - why is this happening? ( https://xap.overemo.com/masternodes) I understand your confusion, I ran into it as well when setting up a MN. The only reason to need the local wallet to be on a VPS, is if you use Apple. Otherwise, you can skip that section VPS for Masternode (Ubuntu 16) Home computer (Windows) for local wallet Works fine) Cheers -Sityl
|
|
|
This explains why we get those weird orders where sell offers are lower than buy offers.
Because the coins aren't actually available to be sold/bought, they've been shoved into a MN, and stocks.exchange doesn't have the capital to cover any transactions until the MN starts paying out.
So when you try to buy coins, the coins aren't really there.
Or if you try to sell your coins to a buy offer, your coins aren't there either, they've been shoved off to a MN.
This is some really shady/unethical business practice, and I definitely will not be using this site again.
|
|
|
Where is the misinformation in my reply? No where on the Zpool website does it state what payment scheme is used and other multi-algo, auto-switching pools do use PPLNS so it was reasonable for me to assume that Zpool did to. Nevertheless, I did write " if...the pool uses the 'PPLNS' payment scheme." which indicates I was not sure what payment scheme is used. BTW - you could have been a bit more diplomatic - not to say courteous - by merely writing, "Zpool uses the proportional scheme, not PPLNS." the scheme is PROP not PPLNS edit... as I see was already corrected ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) thanks So i was right ? If my miner switch from bitcore to another algo that it thinks is more profitable before finding the block ( eg. mining 1 or 2 hours bitcore without finding it ) i mined that time for thin air ? I better remove those algos then i guess ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) In my experience, if you mine for a certain amount of time, your work is counted until the next block is found, even if you've already moved on to another algo. However, if you mined for a few minutes, and it took several hours to find a block, your % of work done is going to be much lower than those who were mining the entire time.
|
|
|
i've been mining vivo for a while, received some payments but never reached my wallet. tried to search tx id, block height, hash and so on other explorers and info i got is totally different from explorer on pool.
DO NOT MINE ON BULWARKPOOL. THEY DON'T PAY AND HAS NO SUPPORT
They're also called bulwarkpool, but don't even allow bulwark mining. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Anyone know off hand, or know of a website that tells you if Cerberus blocks are full, or how much fee to pay to make sure the xfer goes through within 2-3 hours?
|
|
|
Any idea what's going on here? https://imgur.com/a/qB7jWIt's not a cashout, as I haven't had one recently, and the green doesn't change, but it's a really big dip for a price correction. Crowdcoin (neoscrypt) had a HUGE chain split yesterday and LOTS of miners on multiple pools wound up on the wrong side of that. Ahashpool lost 750 CRC due to orphans. Might be the same with ZPool. That's the danger of mining unregulated shitcoins. Never know when the network itself is gonna have shenanigans. Ah that makes sense. Too bad.
|
|
|
Any idea what's going on here? https://imgur.com/a/qB7jWIt's not a cashout, as I haven't had one recently, and the green doesn't change, but it's a really big dip for a price correction.
|
|
|
Hi, Can anyone tell me which one is better (so high or so low possible ) in Benchs. sry I am new in this. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Hashrate (so high possible) Intensity (high 19 between 21) Freq MHZ ? If freq is lower than 2000 and it says mem 4000 is it overdo. is it possible to do -2000 in overclock to save watt? Watts (low possible) Efficiency ? Thank you ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) You're going to have to do your own testing, but I wouldn't do -2000 on anything. Depending on the video card, gpu mhz between 1600-2000 is pretty normal, as is memory speeds in the 4000 range. Usually you don't use negative numbers on the mhz numbers. Some people will decrease voltage to try to save on power, but I'd recommend reading more on it before you do it.
|
|
|
The NiceHash API page isn't helping me.
For pools like ZPool, for example, I can query API and find out current expected rate (in MH/s), as well as 24 hour rate.
When I query NiceHash, it's only giving me buying costs, but not the expected rate in MH/s.
|
|
|
Is anyone else unable to connect to yiimp Neoscrypt?
I've tried with different computers and miners. Have no problem with X17 or phi, just neo.
|
|
|
Is there any kind of command I could put in my batch file to request payments less frequently?
I assume probably not, but thought I'd ask.
Cheers
|
|
|
Nevermind, it must have been down, but is now working.
|
|
|
How does it work if you mine an algo that has multiple coins? It says they pay you in the coin you mine, but if you are mining Neoscrypt, there's three types of coins, and your wallet is obviously only going to work for one of them.
|
|
|
They are different. Original x11 has been mined with asics for quite a while, and x11 gost is a newer algo used by sibcoin (seems to be gpu only so far).
Thanks for the elucidation, wacko)
|
|
|
Are these the same thing?
My google-fu was not up to the task.
|
|
|
Does anyone know how to call api for a pool's 24 hour actual, for example?
I've managed to call api for my earned balance, but not for general pool info.
|
|
|
Hey all. I've successfully added zpool Neoscrypt mining on awesome miner. However, whenever I try to mine a new algo, for example Xevan, awesomeminer just ignores my settings and starts mining blake2s. Not sure if I'm missing something.
1)I make Xevan under algorithms
2)I add Xevan under online services, using various urls (mine.zpool.ca:3739) (xevan.mine.zpool.ca:3739) (stratum+tcp://xevan.mine.zpool.ca:3739)
Am I missing something? Do I have to tell it which miner to use? How would I do that?
Thanks, -Sityl
Edit: Under "Predefined Management Software Properties" under the Managed Software tab, it has Xevan listed as disabled, but I cant find a way to enable it.
|
|
|
|