Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
Hashtalk ran on the NodeBB forum software, cloud-hosted and managed by nodebb.org (hence the invoices we saw) PayCoin Talk runs Vanilla, and is likely cloud-hosted and managed by vanillaforums.com (loosely assumed by the lack of branding... a "perk" Hashtalk also enjoyed by opting for paid hosting) you can see an example of a self-hosted* (branded) Vanilla installation at http://forum.hashtalk.org, although it doesn't take a rocket scientist to remove the branding from a self-hosted installation both are open-source forums whose developers offer managed cloud hosting services -- Hashtalk point to 184.168.221.32
that's a GoDaddy load balancer handling parking pages like the one for hashtalk .com (184.168.221.32) these are not the droids you're looking for -- Cloudflare isn't a cloud hosting service, it's a ddos protection proxy service.
You still need your own hosting.
Makes sense but if this was the case would you not just change the dns to point at the new forum?
I believe the DNS was changed to a "cloud" host of some sort. Maybe they didnt pay them either ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Cloudflare was/is their DNS provider (it also acts as a DDoS protection proxy as mentioned above, and CDN) -- His forum does have the same layout as hashtalk though which is odd. Wonder if that means anything or if its a coincidence and GAW and this guy paid the same third party to design and launch their forums?
default NodeBB theme -- ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F16HoXao.png&t=663&c=Nj-CmQTEs9tpzw) ( http://pastebin.com/4ZFbTv3c) community.nodebb.org (104.131.182.59) is also running on DigitalOcean -- * [edit: looks like forum.hashtalk.org aka gawminers.vanillaforums.org is not "self-hosted", but could be the "starter" plan for $99/mo.. is that bill really still being paid when so many other things aren't?]
|
|
|
https://hashtalk.org/topic/32487/new-announcement/85#@Tom_Ewok said: Who is at the head of the Paycoin foundation ? Do we have any information on who they are ? http://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2giyng/paycoin-foundation-inc Paycoin Foundation, Inc. filed as a Domestic Nonprofit Corporation in the State of Texas on Wednesday, December 17, 2014 and is approximately one year old, according to public records filed with Texas Secretary of State. The filing is currently active as of the last data refresh which occured on Monday, February 16, 2015. Key People Adam Matlack serves as the Director and has interests in other corporate entities including 3RE, LLC located in Austin, TX . Charles Cottrell is the Director of Paycoin Foundation, Inc.. Charles's additional corporate interests include 3RE, LLC located in Austin, TX . The Director of Paycoin Foundation, Inc. is Kenneth Rogers. . Kenneth has other corporate interests including 3RE, LLC located in Austin, TX . * New FB page https://www.facebook.com/XPYFoundationMembership not open YET http://paycoinfoundation.org/membership-coming-soon/Ok so who is this mysterious 3RE, LLC the whole of the paycoin foundation seems to be part of? Josh's church again? I sadly have no idea where to dig into this another brand new registration. nice form https://mycpa.cpa.state.tx.us/coa/servlet/cpa.app.coa.CoaGetTp?Pg=tpid&Search_Nm=3RE%20&Button=search&Search_ID=32056090270http://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2gkvai/3re-llceverything's okay now! XPY is being backed by the sun itself.. https://www.google.com/maps/place/9900+Spectrum+Dr,+Austin,+TX+78717/@30.482825,-97.775906,246m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x8644d2a85f2474af:0x3aeac81a129ebfd5
|
|
|
Interesting news: Technology that looks A LOT like Mr. Garza's purchased HTML injection (aka Man-in-the-Middle Attack) patent junk has been found in Lenovo laptops and Leo Laporte is on national radio RIGHT NOW bashing the technology plus Lenovo. Maybe Garza or one of his cronies licensed the tech off to Superfish - as we all know Garza could never do this much damage on his own... then again... hmmmm. Superfish Intercept - more info http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/02/lenovo-pcs-ship-with-man-in-the-middle-adware-that-breaks-https-connections/Note: MAKE NO MISTAKE, this is NOT AD-WARE. This is MALWARE! Scott- i hope this was a joke.. idk about a "purchase" or a "patent" on Ganza's part (or if he knows what those terms mean), but he deserves approx 0 credit when it comes to using client-side proxies (the "malware" everyone is raving about.. it's not malware until a malicious actor gains control of it, but call Lenovo malicious if you want) to intercept (encrypted) traffic
|
|
|
-snip-
I personally do not know what a DKIM Signed message is, but I do know what "text" is and I am certain that any asshole can type and or copy/paste it. Some better than others. I fail to see why a bunch of text is conclusive proof of anything. If these are real I think you should be forwarding all of this to the SEC or any other alphabet soup bureau that might be interested. Posting them here is suspicious to say the least.
part of DKIM signing is integrity verification like PGP. if something's fishy (body or sender changed, mail not really from that domain) then the sig won't match http://9vx.org/~dho/dkim_validate.php is the first online tool i could find that checks signed mail for tampering. try it out if you like
|
|
|
i have held MRC since release and now i find out that i recently missed some arbitrary 1 month window to burn and convert to MRC2... what a rip ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) good luck reviving MRC though ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
little confused here... can't seem to pool mine
i started by generating a 200gb plot and setting up pocminer for solo, saw all the network messages (basetarget, height, generationsignature) and some shares being submitted
then i grabbed dcct-miner and pointed it to burst-pool.cryptoport.io and my plots directory, but the only output was "19mb read/209gb total/no deadline," and it climbed to "32mb read" over the next hour or so without saying anything else, so i killed it. i tried running it again, and it just shows "0mb read/0gb total/no deadline" now. what do the "mb total" and "mb read" bits indicate?
next, i set up burst-pool-miner the same way. it shows the familiar network messages, but has made no mention of shares after running for hours
my account is visible on the network, and i delegated the pool as my reward assignee. my plots directory indeed exists, is populated, and has 777 permissions on the directory and the plot file. neither miner throws any errors, but the pool website shows no indication that i'm mining
some help, please?
|
|
|
May be miners are mining on these pools some profitable x15 coin for the dev? This can be true (it is no wallet, nobody receive/withdraw coins.......)
um, nah. it would be extremely obvious if the pools were pointing at an existing blockchain. the pools and the block explorer show without a reasonable doubt that the coin was brand new at the time of launch.
|
|
|
Where is the wallet? I don't understand how to use the quoted code on the first page.
the wallet will be released after block 10,000 when PoW ends. keeping the wallet private enables enforcement of the 20MH/s limit. the code quoted in the OP just describes how block rewards are calculated during the PoW phase.
|
|
|
So the BTC is not on an exchange it is in an online wallet service? How much per coin is the IPO? Are the remaining coins going to be destroyed?
Why is no one asking these basic questions?
maybe i'm making stupid assumptions, but what i took away from the OP is that the 500k IPO will be split proportionally among those who send BTC. if that's the case, the current value of 1 LIMI is 440 satoshis. in any event, i'm just happy to be mining something i can casually snatch a fair chunk of ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Which Exchange?
that would be nice to know. if the funds raised by the IPO are going to be used to keep the value stable, that implies the addy is for an exchange that plans on listing LIMI.
|
|
|
Wallet ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) wallet comes out after block 10,000 when PoW ends
|
|
|
where are the girls for "hidden pool" ? ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) LIMI's too new, i hear it's just a sausage fest ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
No withdrawals have been made, the "withdrawals" you see are coins going into stake.
PoS works in the way that coins are sent "to the network into stake". They remain there for a certain amount of blocks and are then returned into your wallet for spending. So you'll see lots of "payouts" and therefore returning small blocks at the two pools addresses.
aha! most excellent ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) since almost nobody's turned on donations at the pools, i surely can't complain about a little PoS. thanks again for your time, explanation, and hosting the pool ofc!
|
|
|
Sorry I'm probably to deep into this stuff in the meanwhile - I apologize.
Those 300+ "other" Blocks are POS blocks.
You see that from the loooow reward (0.0xxxx coins) and the ultimate low diff (0.007xxx) ..
Don't worry for them, we're counting the PoW Blocks
bookmarked for future quoting, thanks! i would have expected PoS to be disabled until the public wallet release, since folks are obviously sensitive to these things, but oh well ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) any word on who's withdrawn coins? i just hope it's people who are supposed to have wallets. (i wonder if abe could easily be modded to have filters for browsing PoW+PoS coins like this)
|
|
|
Could that be the POS system in operation??
maybe? there should only be 3-ish people with the wallet though... the creator(s) and the two pool operators. it *would* be pretty rude for any of them to be solo-mining, stake minting, or transferring coins to personal wallets. all of those things create an unfair advantage. i'm also no blockchain expert, but those inconsistencies are pretty glaring, so it would be great to have someone clear the air. Stop FUD please, check diff of "mined" blocks - PoS Diff
Thx !
it's just confusion, not FUD. even you said "count the blocks," and *afaik* every block so far should be mined, not minted. if you could shed some light for those of us who don't have intimate knowledge of blockchains, that would be great! [edit: i should be more careful with my words ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif) ]
|
|
|
well, this is looking kinda fail. 300+ blocks are now unaccounted for. (pool1 + pool2 != height) seems someone withdrew 6,000 LIMI from one pool, and 15,000 LIMI from the other. the blockchain keeps showing coins being sent. any explanation? [edit: i should be more careful with my words ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif) ]
|
|
|
could you add a "heat" index or smth that scrapes post count (and maybe other metrics with or w/o graphs) from each coin's ann thread? you could get pretty creative with a thing like that, and it would make it easier to pick a couple coins at a time to focus on
thanks! awesome site!
|
|
|
cgminer 3.7.2 has many many bugs that have since been patched in newer versions and branches such as sgminer. There's really no good reason to be using an old version of cgminer anymore - switch to sgminer.
-snip-
sgminer lacks GridSeed support, i'm more familiar with the cgminer codebase, sgminer dropped SHA suppport and baked in lots of code that makes it difficult to patch in new algorithms, i get better performance from cgminer 3.7.2 with Kalroth's tweaks, sgminer was susceptible to the client.reconnect exploit last time i checked (fixed by this commit in the latest build), R. M. Davidson's patches don't apply to sgminer out of the box, and my build would be a headache to break into pieces to migrate to sgminer + latest cgminer + misc cgminer forks for other algos. "switch to sgminer" may be a fine solution for many, but not for me today. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) The bug we're talking about it related to correct handling of extra nonce 2 (extranonce2, xnonce2) size. In cgminer 2.7.2 xnonce is fixed to 4 ... however by stratum protocol this should be "dynamic/resizable". Well, actually you should ask ckolivas for details regarding that ... I'm not sure in which exact version this was patched but if you can find out I'll be very glad if you'd share the info here.
thanks! i'll drop a patch here when i track down the issue and get around to testing fixes. Well, what we're seeing here with this cgminer-3.7.2 is similar to WinXP story ... to many users of too old software, and when support ends it's "Houston, we've got problems" ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) -snip- similar in the sense that a large part of the userbase didn't like the new direction and chose to rebel against it, but this is free software. cgminer 3.7.2 is still actively improved upon, though unfortunately there's a distinct lack of collaboration among devs, (myself included. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) )
|
|
|
can anyone (kenshirothefist: *poke*) summarize the problem with cgminer 3.7.2 and NiceHash's scrypt pool, point out the breaking commit (between cgminer 3.1.1 and 3.7.2) or the fix (in sgminer) relating to it? btw, great job on this service so far! it's great to see some innovative new pool ideas this year ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|