 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »
|
|
If you have one and wanna sell let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
havent been here for ages, so what are you guys mining now?
|
|
|
|
|
If I have lost my 12 words passphrase, is it possible to recover the coins in anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone mining deepcoin? It becoming hard to continue solo mining it, to mine on a pool, they say you have to add --difficulty-multiplier 256 to your command line. Is there an equivalent command for ccminer?
|
|
|
|
|
You should add deepcoin, using qubit algo.
|
|
|
|
Is the dev team active ? If you want pool. Dwarfpool team is good in exotic algo integration (Jackpotcoin, Twecoin, Fuguecoin etc...). Qubit is used in Myriadcoin, so Myriad-Qubit pool owner can easily set up a Deepcoin-Qubit pool. Or used p2pool : https://github.com/qubitcoin/QubitCoin-p2poolSpread the hash like this, no? Would be awesome if Dwarfpool will add this coin.  |
|
|
|
tsiv and djm i may have to change cudamining.cc
I am considering on the releases page to have a few sections, one for christians releases, and a page each for you 2 with logins to the site so you can add releases yourselves. Up for it?
+1 Also consider the same agreement with bombadil |
|
|
|
I'll just leave this here...  Damn, that's slow. Seems to scale almost perfectly with hardware memory bandwidth when comparing with Claymore's AMD miner. R9 290X has 3.7x theoretical memory bandwidth compared to 750 Ti and does around 600 H/s. Surprise, 600 / 3.7 comes to around 162. Same story with 270X and it's rougly 2x mem bandwidth. Guess that's not entirely unexpected since there's a whole lot of global memory access going on with the cryptonight algo. Still poking at it but I doubt it'll improve much without C&C level voodoo magic and that's well beyond my skillset Awesome! You're becoming this threads hero! |
|
|
|
https://github.com/zelante/ccminer/releasesv1.2.5 "Split Screen ccMiner" (2014-06-22) Source + Windows Binary release Add average hashrate from last 50 hashrates Add nvidia driver version info Add start of mining date and time info gpu info string: gpu_id [by_bus_id]: gpu_full_name currient_khash/average_khash temperature/max_temperature fan_rpm(fan_%) core_clock_mhz core_load_% memory_clock_mhz memory_controller_load_% memory_used_mb memory_used_% I'm seeing something a bit odd with the display when launching it via my NiceHash control program.   same here windows 8 Same here on windows 7 64 bit |
|
|
|
I made some changes to my profit calc this weekend. So here it is:  v0.4: https://github.com/KBomba/cuda-profit-calc/releasesChanges since v0.2: - Massive speed upgrade - Added fiat/day option (USD, EUR, GBP & CNY) using Coindesk - Excludes very low volume coins now when "healthy coins" is checked. - Added Poloniex - Added option to weigh all exchanges into the BTC price, like this: (exchange1_price * exchange1_percentageOfTotalVol) + (exchange2_price * exchange2_percentageOfTotalVol) + ... Gives a better view on the real price if a coin is well spread among exchanges. - Fixed PoolPicker - General improvements and fixes PS: If you guys think I should open another thread for this tiny app, please tell  EDIT: Oops, seems like I missed "BTC/day" ^^" Fixed it. Thx yellowduck2! Do you know how many people have downloaded your app? |
|
|
|
If I was to setup a mining machine with quad 750 Ti's powered by a sempron 145, would 4gb of ram be enough to run ccminer efficiently, or would 8gb be needed? I tried to run 4x 750 Ti's with my sempron 145 and 2gb of ram a few months ago and that didn't end well. If anyone is currently running their miners with a low powered CPU such as a Sempron 145 I'd appreciate if you chimed in. Running 3x750 Ti's on the cheapest available Sempron with 2 GB of RAM. Still on ccminer v1.0 .. getting 5.75 Mh/s total for X11... no overclocking. ccminer uses ~15% of the cpu. I wouldn't recommend 2 GB on windows though... that sounds like a nightmare... this box runs Xubuntu and has free ram still. Built the box before I had heard of X11... thanks to the authors of cudaminer/ccminer, the box is more profitable than ever. Sadly Windows needs more than 2GB  4GB is the bare minimum of what I'd recommend to use with Windows I got few. 6x750ti miners with the cheapest celeron I could find. Each rig has a 4gb ram, running windows 7. I only had problems when ccminer only released with x11 support, a day after Christian released another version, and since then CPU use is about 15% on all algos. i've bought 8gb instead(the same model as my gaming rig) so if all this crap won't be profitable in the future, i can use those ram instead of selling them When you'll figure out that, this crap, is not profitable anymore, just sell it to those who haven't figured it out yet. I got really nice payment for my 2 jalapeņos 7 month ago. |
|
|
|
If I was to setup a mining machine with quad 750 Ti's powered by a sempron 145, would 4gb of ram be enough to run ccminer efficiently, or would 8gb be needed? I tried to run 4x 750 Ti's with my sempron 145 and 2gb of ram a few months ago and that didn't end well. If anyone is currently running their miners with a low powered CPU such as a Sempron 145 I'd appreciate if you chimed in. Running 3x750 Ti's on the cheapest available Sempron with 2 GB of RAM. Still on ccminer v1.0 .. getting 5.75 Mh/s total for X11... no overclocking. ccminer uses ~15% of the cpu. I wouldn't recommend 2 GB on windows though... that sounds like a nightmare... this box runs Xubuntu and has free ram still. Built the box before I had heard of X11... thanks to the authors of cudaminer/ccminer, the box is more profitable than ever. Sadly Windows needs more than 2GB 4GB is the bare minimum of what I'd recommend to use with Windows I got few. 6x750ti miners with the cheapest celeron I could find. Each rig has a 4gb ram, running windows 7. I only had problems when ccminer only released with x11 support, a day after Christian released another version, and since then CPU use is about 15% on all algos. |
|
|
|
I may invest in some coins soon just to see how they go, 100% honesty which would you invest in?
Warning 1: If you are wrong i will hunt you down and cyber-attack you for EVER!!!!!!!!!
Warning 2: Warning 1 is not to be taken seriously
I think vertcoin (vtc) is pretty undervalued right now. Just don't buy it in cryptsy, they have an "issue" with withdrawals for 2 days now. |
|
|
|
Of course open source is much better, but what we got here is Christian's source instead. C&c are the only developers of ccminer, if it was a community effort, it was a different story. But as long as he got better code that he keeps for himself, what btw he's totally entitled to do and I have nothing against it, its not really the open source community you're talking about.
You do know that before CCMiner, we've had Cudaminer, and that it was another contributor that helped bump everyone's hashrates on Scrypt (and Scrypt-Jane IIRC). Bigjme's examples are also quite on the mark for community contributions. An open source effort is inclusive and attracts more contributors, period. Christian's source also carries over code from other projects, or at least it did as it started out (cpuminer...). Do you see the pattern? When you open source your project, you're not only giving something away to others. You're also inviting them into the rabbit hole. Much better. ~ Myagui First of all, I got my nvidia rigs about 3 month ago, so I don't really know cudaminer history. I would prefer it stays open source, I just thought about an idea for christian, that could benefit us as well. No one promise us that nvidia miners will be still efficient in the future (new algos etc). Building and optimizing a miner is hard work, and if Christian is almost the only one developer, not sure it worth his time if he can't benefit much from it. In a normal open source project there's 10 Christians, and each one coding a part of it. I'm working now on FPGA miner, and I got to say, its much harder and time consuming than. I've imagined |
|
|
|
Most people don't seem to grasp the importance of 'open source' to this economy. Open source attracts a lot more people to any project, it creates an inclusive community (as opposed to an exclusionary one), and establishes long term growth. Would Bitcoin have ever been worth *anything* if most of it's mining remained concentrated on a couple of 'closed source' projects? Note: I've nothing against closed source, and certainly nothing against Christian making huge profits  , but I remain confident that Christian and the community at large, will continue to drive cuda mining forward in an open fashion. To the earlier poster that asked about XMR/BBR mining profitability: I should have added that I'm still mining XMR myself, even if it would barely pay for the electricity. I have strong convictions to XMR's long term value, so I'll continue to mine & hold. ~ Myagui Of course open source is much better, but what we got here is Christian's source instead. C&c are the only developers of ccminer, if it was a community effort, it was a different story. But as long as he got better code that he keeps for himself, what btw he's totally entitled to do and I have nothing against it, its not really the open source community you're talking about. @bigjme of course it would require much more work and funding from his side, but will also make it more profitable, imo. |
|
|
|
How profitable is to mine monero and bbr? Will it cover servers expenses?
I can totally understand Christian for not sharing his code, as long as he makes shitloads of money. But I think a dedicated cuda pool, with auto switching mechanism that will support only a binary released by Christian. He can even charge a 15% fee, as long as the pool more profitable than the free alternative, he can charge even 15% fee. This way I think it would be more profitable than keeping the code for himself.
Just to make it clear, I really appreciate open source software in general, and christian for sharing his awesome work with us all.
And what would be the point for Christian? This would mean more work, more investment in hardware to get more coins, which will actually worth less. Also, did you follow XMR threads? DDoS attacks all over the place? It's not easy to maintain a pool. It gives him scalability, I don't know how much hardware he owns, but mining himself with 10 GPUs, or having 15% of 1000 GPUs, I think the seconed option is more profitable. Let's take the x11 for example. We had 2.2 mhash ccminer, christian had a 2.7 mhash ccminer. If he had 10 750tis, he had 27 mhash overall. If we all were mining on his pool with 1000 GPUs, he would own 4ghash. The better miner would make the coin 20% less profitable which brings him to about 3ghash. Still more profitable. You, as a user could keep mining with the 2.2 version, and not paying the higher fee, but as long enough of cuda miners would move to this pool, others won't have any option cause it would make it less profitable for them to mine on their own. |
|
|
|
How profitable is to mine monero and bbr? Will it cover servers expenses?
Generally speaking, it's not profitable, if you're paying "average" price for server renting and have the regular miners that are floating about. It takes scale of numbers (and/or cheap AWS spot instances), and further optimized miners to really make profit. I mined a few Monero early on, so those would turn out a decent profit if I sold today (though I'll be holding anyways). With the current diff, it barely pays for the electricity. Cheers, ~ Myagui Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
