Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 04:26:53 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][AirDrop] Bytether, The New Bitcoin, - 1:1 Cross-Fork of Bitcoin onto Ether on: January 28, 2018, 06:03:30 PM
Can someone explain to me why I didn't got my BTH?
Iv'e registered with this address:
0xbc77d133cedc53814e2b183903dc32bc3b077c02

You got it, not that it'll do you much good.

https://etherscan.io/token/0xfad572db566e5234ac9fc3d570c4edc0050eaa92?a=0xbc77d133cEdc53814e2B183903dC32bc3B077c02
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][AirDrop] Bytether, The New Bitcoin, - 1:1 Cross-Fork of Bitcoin onto Ether on: January 28, 2018, 12:26:26 AM
Any chance this will be fixed soon?

I think they're gone for good. 


No, if you see on the left where it says "Make sure BTH is ...", the BTH is clickable and gives you information about the token.    This is Bytether: https://etherdelta.com/#BTHE-ETH
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][AirDrop] Bytether, The New Bitcoin, - 1:1 Cross-Fork of Bitcoin onto Ether on: January 28, 2018, 12:17:39 AM
both buys sent a trickle (.000305) of Ether to another contract, https://etherscan.io/address/0x3dbdc81a6edc94c720b0b88fb65dbd7e395fdcf6, but I don't see that mentioned anywhere in the contract. any idea what's up with that?

I only lost about 3 bucks and a few hours on this so I'm not gonna cry. just curious as to what really happened.

That was Bytether paying Oracalize for the lookup to their website.  However, it was Bythether's ether, not yours. 
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][AirDrop] Bytether, The New Bitcoin, - 1:1 Cross-Fork of Bitcoin onto Ether on: January 16, 2018, 05:39:17 PM
I wanted to learn a little about Solidity and Ethereum so I had a look at the Bytether contract to see what it was up to.

First thing is that virtually all of the technical differences on the comparison chart in the OP are due to Ethereums's features.  BTH is just specifying the total circulating supply and launch date.  They haven't developed anything technically significant.

They briefly mention a "user growth pool" of 3m BTH.  I don't see them mentioning that there is also a "developer fund" of 1m BTH.    Both of these are created on top of the 17m bitcoin they're intending to crossfork.  There is no attempt to hide any of this in the code, it even has relevant comments.

The contract uses the bytether.com site to get the amount of BTH to be given.  The contract itself makes no attempt to verify this information, it simply trusts the website and also trusts oracalize.it to relay the information.  They claim that they "cannot" assign BTH from the crossfork pool to any accounts, but that is technically incorrect.  As they control the website they can have it reply with any results that they wish.  As I don't see where they list the signatures they have received there would be no way to know if they were assigning themselves BTH for bitcoin addresses that they do not own unless they happened to be caught using an address they couldn't possibly own (note I haven't seen any evidence that they're actually doing this, nor have any reason to believe thay might be).

The fact that the crossfork process relies on the website means that any attempt to crossfork will fail while the website is down (as it currently is).  There are quite a few pending transactions and they will all fail if they get mined while the website is down.

I don't see them mentioning whether they evaluated using a merkle tree of the UTXOs at the time of the crossfork instead of relying on the website.  

The contract contains the ability to freeze accounts.  It also contains the ability to automatically buy/sell BTH, although its BTH balance is 0 and this feature is currently turned off.  Their revertCrossFork function can be used by moderators at any time to remove a crossforked balance from its initial address.  

The ability to crossfork can be turned off in the contract.  They haven't mentioned when of if this will ever be used.  
5  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Verifying signature result with Electrum 3.0.5 on: January 09, 2018, 12:04:26 AM
Don't run windows, but here is linux

$ gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --search-keys 0x2BD5824B7F9470E6
gpg: searching for "0x2BD5824B7F9470E6" from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
(1)   ThomasV <thomasv1@gmx.de>
   Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv1@gmx.de>
   Thomas Voegtlin (https://electrum.org) <thomasv@electrum.org>
     4096 bit RSA key 7F9470E6, created: 2011-06-15
Keys 1-1 of 1 for "0x2BD5824B7F9470E6".  Enter number(s), N)ext, or Q)uit > 1
gpg: requesting key 7F9470E6 from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
gpg: key 7F9470E6: public key "Thomas Voegtlin (https://electrum.org) <thomasv@electrum.org>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:               imported: 1  (RSA: 1)

$ gpg --verify electrum-3.0.5.exe.asc electrum-3.0.5.exegpg: Signature made Mon 08 Jan 2018 00:14:38 GMT using RSA key ID 7F9470E6
gpg: Good signature from "Thomas Voegtlin (https://electrum.org) <thomasv@electrum.org>"
gpg:                 aka "ThomasV <thomasv1@gmx.de>"
gpg:                 aka "Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv1@gmx.de>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 6694 D8DE 7BE8 EE56 31BE  D950 2BD5 824B 7F94 70E6
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN]Trendercoin TDC Distribution is LIVE! on: December 14, 2017, 02:23:19 AM
Good luck.

Eth: 0xf16490c72a0861E2356C4aE1534037b8267a5685
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!