Re Neptune (and Jupiter):  I haven't read through all 780+ posts in this thread, but does anyone know if you can take one of the neptune boxes and wire it up to a standard host?  Windows, Linux, etc?  Are the connectors between the boxes and the controller board USB, or something more esoteric?

I have a few boxes/cards from neptune's and Jupiter's at home, and if I could hook them up to random machines at work and control them using someone else's power costs, I'd love to.  But, trying to get the controllers to work on a corporate network would be a pain.

Thanks.

I see a pretty normal amount for block 22125 for myself, but in the last couple hours, the estimate for the current block dropped from it's normal number to about 1% of normal.  It's still only showing about 2.5% of the "normal" value per block.  And, my average hash rate in the last 60 mins, displayed, is as good as ever.  No issues.

And this block has been cooking for more than 12 hours, it's only in the last couple hours that the estimated dropped away from it's normal range...

Yeah, it wasn't there earlier when I first noticed the surprising lack of payout, but I see it now.  Thanks all for pointing it out.  So the payout will be a little bigger.  I'm okay with that.   

I expected a payout earlier this morning but have not yet received it.  My quoted reward on the statistics page all seem within normal variance, but my balance has been over my send threshold for a few hours now.  Is there a problem in the system?

I know they're not going to be the same, but I hadn't usually seen so much as 15% variance.  Again, I'm not too worried about it, and I'll know more only after the block is solved.


Quite right.  Thank you very much.  I'm always happy to be reminded when I get grammar/wording/spelling wrong.  I need to continue to improve if I want to have the ability to correct others.  ;-)

You're right.  I see that.  However, the current round has been running for 16.5 hours.  I brought one of my workers back online about 11 hours ago.  And, the Mhash/s reported for that worker is somewhere around 85% of what my worker is reporting.  And, in the past, this same worker has shown a hash rate on the pool of the same as it's reporting.

I won't be able to tell for sure until the block finishes and the next round starts, but imperial evidence suggests that the reported is _not_ a 60-minute average.  I'll keep an eye on it, but.

Right, on the My Account page.  That's what I was asking about originally.  But, that only shows an average for the worker across the whole of the current round.  I'd like to see a 20 minute, or even 1 hour, average.  So that I can see any effect of tuning in my workers without having to wait more than a full round.

Thanks.  I thought that might be the case.  Makes it hard to see variation in any changes I make in the config of my miner, since rounds sometimes last most of a day, but understandable.  Is there any break-down of what work is being contributed by workers elsewhere in the interface?

I have a question that is probably already answered somewhere, but, I haven't been able to find the answer.

The "MH/s" shown on the "My Account" page, for each worker.  Over what time period is that?  I assume it's an average over some time period, but, what is the time period?

Thanks....

I'm not sure if this is a TerraMiner problem or a cgminer problem, but I'm sure Cointerra would be likely to blame cgminer if they can, so I thought I'd start with a wider audience.   

I have a TerraMiner IV which underperforms as promised delivering about 1.6 TH/s.  _If_ I'm running the included cgminer (4.1.0) in failover mode.  So, to one pool, it works fine.

However, if I define multiple pools, and use load-balance (after fixing the syntax error CoinTerra's web interface puts in the cgminer.conf file), then I'm seeing only about 1.2 TH/s reported.  If I look at the cgminer log file, it often shows more like 1.3-1.4 TH/s average, but it too shows over 1.6 TH/s when running in failover mode.

Is this a normal thing for cgminer, for the [reported] H/s to be lower when running in load-balance mode?

Thanks...

I have a CoinTerra running at Slush's pool, and it does suck for a little bit when it starts up at a difficulty of 3.  But it doesn't take very long for it to vardiff itself up to 1100 or 1200.  Is vardiff not working for you?  Is that the problem you're seeing, or is it some other connection problem?

I just came here from the pool page.  I had unconfirmed shares earlier, but that's now 0 on the "My account" page, with the confirmed being the same amount it was last night.  I've got 500 GH/s going in, and nothing shows?  There was 0.03+, or more, unconfirmed; now 0.0000000 ?  I hope this gets fixed, and I get back what was already there pending confirmation a few hours ago....

:-/  Concerned....

So, no Mac-heads here in Newbies. :-(

Congrats!  I actually got started by a friend who had a couple bit coin, I got 0.01 BTC back when that was only worth about $1 US.  Then I got head-strong into it and have been having a blast ever since.  It only gets harder as difficulty increases, but it's still fun, and I think of it as "a science project".

Keep your GPU's and ASIC's to the grindstone, and you'll be having fun and making coin, crypto, virtual, and hopefully real...

Hi!  :-)

The main DogeCoin thread has an old (1.1) client for Mac, but not states that the 1.3 client is a mandatory upgrade due to changes, and _must_ be in place by 1/1/2014.

I'm on a mac, and I can't find a 1.3 client.  Anyone have one?  Anyone have any pointers for building one?  I have Xcode, and have done development on UNIX and Mac's before, but I can't figure out what version of Qt I need to install for the DogeCoin sources, and I haven't figured out how to get the client compiled.

It's been done, in Mavericks even, according to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=362856, but there's no info there as to the steps taken.

Anyone know where I can get a 1.3/current/HEAD version of the DogeCoin wallet/client for Mac?  Please?  Thanks...