 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
The fact of everything works is not a synonym that everything is lawful, if you look to all ponzi scheme all of them worked fine.
But what I mean it is if the site creates a new way to give some reward to your users, that should have a way to the users certify if this way is real, because it is very easy to simulate a new "lambo competition" and then give a random winner.
If you want to be naive to believe that everything works fine and is lawful, that is your choice , not mine.
I really don’t know if this is legal and who controls it, but the fact that the project has been working for many years is proof of “cleanliness” for me. If you won this amount, would you tell everyone about it?  but the fact that the project has been working for many years is proof of “cleanliness” for me
Good for you, not for me. If you won this amount, would you tell everyone about it? For me win, I would need to play, and I would only play, if I had a way to know if this is lawful. |
|
|
|
How Can we know if this user is a real user? Nothing. It's a big fake. To give away free Lambos they have to steal funds from people. Big Fraud. Scam Site. I am pretty sure that what it happened to you it was a trap, because they know about multiple roll with many accounts, but they allow that until find the "cheaters" to block their accounts. That makes them as guilty as the cheaters. |
|
|
|
How Can we know if this user is a real user?
And why should it be an unreal user? To get started, sign up and try to play and withdraw money, and then drive nonsense. Everything works. I'm sure the owner of the car is genuine. The fact of everything works is not a synonym that everything is lawful, if you look to all ponzi scheme all of them worked fine. But what I mean it is if the site creates a new way to give some reward to your users, that should have a way to the users certify if this way is real, because it is very easy to simulate a new "lambo competition" and then give a random winner. If you want to be naive to believe that everything works fine and is lawful, that is your choice , not mine. |
|
|
|
How Can we know if this user is a real user? |
|
|
|
I think that Freebitcoin could forbidden roll for the same ip even if you have more than $100 in your account, that is so easy to they do. Probably they allow it to incentive people try to cheat the site for after block their account and keep their money.
Exactly. That's it. Then Don't Deposit Funds.
P.S. It's not "cheat", it's following their rules. Yeah man, it is cheat because on their terms of service is writing: 1. Please do not use bots. 2. ...Does not matter. 3. Please do not try to abuse the free giveaway by creating multiple accounts and collecting the free prize more than once every hour using proxies or similar IP addres changing apllications/services. So they know that people will try to cheat the website, they allow it for after block their accounts and keep their money. This is very interesting for them. |
|
|
|
|
I think that Freebitcoin could forbidden roll for the same ip even if you have more than $100 in your account, that is so easy to they do. Probably they allow it to incentive people try to cheat the site for after block their account and keep their money.
|
|
|
|
I didn't mean to wager this much...but it worked out XD.
Are you going back here to say when you lost everything too?  |
|
|
|
Of course that is a scam, he thought in everything to make this video, one thing that would denounce him it is a simple fact to hide the deposit address, do not have reason to do this, he made because anybody could check if the deposit really happened. |
|
|
|
Please,
Administrators of freebitcoin, i have one doubt:
Can i create many accounts in the site and deposit in all these accounts a balance of BTC for remove captcha, and play free roll in all accounts all hours? I say this because i noticed that the site allows play free roll one more time in the same hour in on diferent accounts when accounts is without captcha; if i do this, am i going against the rules of the site?
No. Only one free roll per person per hour. Doing that in more than one account is abusing the faucet and is not only cheating us but means there is less money to give honest people that only use one account. So would not it be more appropriate for the site to block more than one other roll for different accounts when they are without captcha? The same happens when the account has the captcha. |
|
|
|
|
Please,
Administrators of freebitcoin, i have one doubt:
Can i create many accounts in the site and deposit in all these accounts a balance of BTC for remove captcha, and play free roll in all accounts all hours? I say this because i noticed that the site allows play free roll one more time in the same hour in on diferent accounts when accounts is without captcha; if i do this, am i going against the rules of the site?
|
|
|
|
I need to get wetsuit to change that.
Does the site have a bug? |
|
|
|
I'm going through a similar problem every time I clicked on REQUIREMENTS TO UNLOCK BONUSES to find out the requirements for PLAY FREE BTC WITHOUT CAPTCHA, I only met one of these requirements and my account ran out of captcha for 1 free rooll, I always did that to play without the captcha, but now even meeting the requirement the account remains with the captcha, can anyone tell you why this problem?
Same as above, if you won more from free rolls the requirements will increase. Yes I know this rule, but even meeting the requirements that have increased, the account is not running out of captcha anymore. Also it is happening of not appearing the message REQUIREMENTS TO UNLOCK BONUSES and the account remains with the captcha. |
|
|
|
What i don't get it is why so many bots win the lottery? I mean is not like they have 1 million tickets each.
It is the total tickets that matter, not how many each bot has. It was a network of 30,000 bots with ~25,000 tickets each, giving 750,000,000 or about 65% of the tickets. That made winning 6 out of 10 the expected statistical result. You'll notice that the total number of tickets is much lower this week as we have found a way to stop them. Sheezuz, 30k bots? How the hell does that even happen? There is no way that is a 1 person job, some group of people are going to a ridiculous extent to try and cheat your site. Yeah it's crazy, I had no idea there were so many bots...Just a question, why my account is demanding captcha again? Already made deposits and also gamble huge bets... Another thing that bothers me is that I win and lose huge bets and buy so many lottery tickets, yet my bonus btc (minimum payout) doesn't increase that much. My impression is that increasing 10% (for instance) it's way more difficult that it was last year...maybe I am wrong  I'm going through a similar problem every time I clicked on REQUIREMENTS TO UNLOCK BONUSES to find out the requirements for PLAY FREE BTC WITHOUT CAPTCHA, I only met one of these requirements and my account ran out of captcha for 1 free rooll, I always did that to play without the captcha, but now even meeting the requirement the account remains with the captcha, can anyone tell you why this problem? |
|
|
|
Preciso avaliar, me envie um print da tela inicial.
Oque o Alegotardo fez foi uma brincadeira com você. Recomendo este conversor para você entender melhor a unidade satoshi: http://satoshitobitcoin.co/Desculpe @Albatroz4402, de fato era uma brincadeira. 1 Satoshi é o mesmo que 0.00000001 BTC. Então eu acredito que você queira ter dito 200 sat/hora ou 0.000002 BTC/hora, certo? Enfim, de fato eu tenho uma conta no freebitcoin desde 2015, a qual já me deu uns bons trocados (a custa de outros, não me orgulho disso), mas isso porque eu esqueci dela por um bom tempo e só fui sacar os BTC em Setembro de 2017 (imagina o sacrifício pra lembrar da senha). Atualmente ela não rende nada significativo. Atualmente eu acesso para brincar e eventualmente e tentar a sorte na roleta (na aba Multiply BTC). No mais, considero como um item de colecionador e minha recordação amarga dos tempos em que eu deveria ter aproveitado melhor o meu primeiro contato com o BTC. Então, não está a venda. Exato essa quantidade que eu me referia, pode ter ficado confuso a forma que coloquei, mas é isso aí mesmo... Só que não me refiro a uma conta que tenha referidos e sim uma conta "upada", que atinge essa quantia conforme a quantidade de tickets de loteria comprados ou a quantidade de BTCs apostados na roleta do multiply. |
|
|
|
|
Preciso avaliar, me envie um print da tela inicial.
|
|
|
|
Se você tiver uma conta no freebitco.in que esteja com um bônus que rende atualmente pelo menos 0.000002 satoshis por hora, eu me interesso em comprar. Meus contatos: E-mail: fb.faucets@gmail.comTelegram: @Fabio4402 |
|
|
|
|
I did another test of the algorithm with my private key and got no feedback ...
But I understood the algorithm and I managed to reproduce a certain result, I used a random private key of 51 characters, the algorithm only shows a result with a private key of 51 characters and if the missing positions are filled exactly in the place of origin, in any other position the algorithm does not give a response with a valid private key.
Unfortunately in my case I have no idea of the positions of the lost characters, but I keep trying, because it has been very useful for me to learn new skills and resources.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the great help my friend!
I have not yet tested the algorithm with the code change you made, I'll test it today at the end of the day and post the result here.
The private key starts with 5, so the total would be 51 characters right?
|
|
|
|
Did you use the first program, or the one that also works on compressed keys? I used the first program. The strangest thing is that even though I was using a private key that I know, hiding 5 characters, I did not get any results = /. Have you used the first program yet and were able to get a result? Aren't you missing 5 characters missing instead of 4, if you have 47 only? A quick test shows my private keys are 52 characters long.
Yes you are right, I found that the private keys had 51 characters, but when testing a few others, I noticed that they are 52 characters. Do you have any idea how much is stored on your address?
More or less 5 BTC. |
|
|
|
What kind of output do you get? No at all? According to the source code ( https://pastebin.com/S8WARrRn): int c1 = 0, c2 = 0, c3 = 0, c4 = 0, c5 = 0, status;
float startTime, endTime;
for (c1 = 0; c1 < 58; c1++) {
addr[C_1_INDEX] = chars[c1];
for (c2 = 0; c2 < 58; c2++) {
addr[C_2_INDEX] = chars[c2];
printf("Test: %c%c...", chars[c1], chars[c2]);fflush(stdout);
startTime = (float)clock()/CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
for (c3 = 0; c3 < 58; c3++) {
addr[C_3_INDEX] = chars[c3];
for (c4 = 0; c4 < 58; c4++) {
addr[C_4_INDEX] = chars[c4];
for (c5 = 0; c5 < 58; c5++) {
addr[C_5_INDEX] = chars[c5];
status = valid(addr);
if (status) {
printf("\nFOUND: %s\n", addr);
return 1;
}
}
}
}
endTime = (float)clock()/CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
printf("%fs\n", (endTime-startTime));
}
}
You should get at least the output of the overall time it took to run the script. If you do see how long it took overall (in source code: printf("%fs\n", (endTime-startTime));) the program went through all combinations and didn't found the correct private key. If you do NOT see this output the script somehow (1) is not done yet or (2) aborted. This script requires you to know the exact location of the missing chars. It will iterate through the positions marked with an ' -' only.
The algorithm goes through all the cycles and in the end it does not show me any results, not even the total time spent for execution. I even generated a private key in WIF format (I do not know if this implies some different behavior) to test the algorithm, I hid 5 random characters in the middle and in the end, I compiled twice the code doing the index changes and even then, end of the process, the algorithm also showed no results. If you don't mind me asking: how did you lose the characters, and why is the location of the lost characters uncertain? What happened?
At the time when I got the private key, I just jotted down the numbers and letters generated for me, I did not back up, and nowhere else, so I'm not sure what characters in which positions were missing ... (I was very noob) . |
|
|
|
|
