@ilPancrazio. Sorry but for now, Aeon is not a good entry level cryptocoin. There will be many disappointments coming out from this project in the future, I reckon. The first one being the delays of the code rebase. So Aeon needs people who are experienced in the cryptospace and open source projects in general.
Aeon does not need the small speculators who will cry and demand something because what they expected to happen did not come to fruition. If you are a newbie, your best move is to leave now.
Yeah, of course, i pretty much understand that is actually better dealing with core problems first and focusing on the main project. In the above, i actually wanted to state the "kind of perception" it gives when someone is approaching Aeon... i'm reading a lot from the internet, reddit, irc, that i frequent substantially, github etc. and i figured that a lot of people basically just wanna give themself a chance to try with Aeon, even if they're not skilled in such above mentioned requirements. My personal opinion is that the majority comes from Monero somehow, probably heard of Aeon on the way. And i think they felt like is potentially a good start.
That's the cause that actually brought them here, it means that's a phenomenon it can't be ignored.
I know and agree with you, is not recommended to commit much if not adeguately aware of the risk, therefore i'm not so sure that many of the above mentioned "newbies" are such fools..
My opinion is that new users are still beneficial, more hashrate is beneficial.
In a couple of days i've managed of recovering an old server, in the next days it will be operative, just bringing 2 Kh/s more, all in budget, all thanks to community advices, references and research. It is possible for anyone to improve themself.
Finally, the tl;dr is aeon is enticing, just with the proper ways, would get more support even with totally newbies, some good strategy already should do the trick.