Show Posts
Hello everyone!
I believe that ZERO is a great project and would be happy to help in any way that I can.
I have noticed a few things that could be improved on the website, here are some changes in red that I suggest in order to polish the site a little more:
- On the About us page:
[Zero project somehow refused to perish and appeared to have aconscious conscience of its own.
- Also, is the following claim realistic?: "Zero is by far the most intelligent crypto-currency and is constantly expanding and evolving"
To me that seems a bit too much, I would suggest "Zero is one of the most advanced crypto-currency and is constantly expanding and evolving"
Let me know what you think.
Strell
I believe that ZERO is a great project and would be happy to help in any way that I can.
I have noticed a few things that could be improved on the website, here are some changes in red that I suggest in order to polish the site a little more:
- On the About us page:
[Zero project somehow refused to perish and appeared to have a
- Also, is the following claim realistic?: "Zero is by far the most intelligent crypto-currency and is constantly expanding and evolving"
To me that seems a bit too much, I would suggest "Zero is one of the most advanced crypto-currency and is constantly expanding and evolving"
Let me know what you think.
Strell
Hi, good work i noticed these grammar things also. English is not the easy language to learn secondary from what i hear, largely due to some silly "rules" that are counterintuitive with all other languages lol.. I agree with most changes except the one that remains above. When speaking of "conscience" now are we suggesting zero has.moral values and knows "right" and "wrong". My inferrance of the original text is that the word consciousness should be there not conscience..
And the statement regarding the intelligence of zero, again a comical ambiguouty thanks to english! : ) without a few more words we cant know for sure the intended goal of the statement. However not neccesarily preferrable to transcribe it to something else. Without speaking of zero as a person of intellect we might assume that the statement would like to convey that the coin itself (by design) is the most intelligent crypto. I wouldnt disagree with that statement although time and battle testing is what will prove it. Of course this could be misinterpreted as a claim to AI which of course zero is not AI. Or it could be indicating that a person of intellect would choose zero heh just kidding... your suggested replacement statement is also good though, and more specific less ambiguouty... i prefer the intelligent word personally..
Hi awill333,
I agree with what you said, it should remain "conscious" and not "conscience", my mistake.
Regarding your last point, I think the word "intelligent" is also fine, my concern was more on the part where it says that it is "by far the most" intelligent. I certainty can't say whether that's true or not, but even if it is, it's probably a bit too early to make such a claim.
