Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
Question: What tool or API is used to obtain the data reflected in the image in the first post?
|
|
|
By the way, your "How to Play" video on the site doesn't work. The message says "This video is private."
|
|
|
Personal Deposit Address 18oqyG8cqkvo17GFQFV8JN9a3gUBVYpBXk
|
|
|
Thank you Danny.
Sold a digital good using Danny's escrow service. Danny is trustworthy and reliable. Transaction went smoothly.
|
|
|
I am guessing you would provide the account login and password to the escrow person/service? The escrow person can then verify the login and then send the password to the buyer, who would then make any necessary changes to the account recovery options?
I have someone interested in an account I am selling but requesting that I provide the password to them directly, presumably after the BTC is in escrow.
I'm a bit unsure of that if a dispute arises, how I would make my case that I did in fact provide the correct password.
|
|
|
And because of this, would the above scheme be better off using different wallets rather than different addresses within the wallets?
That depends on what you are trying to accomplish. When you send bitcoins from an Electrum wallet, you will not be able to choose which bitcoins are sent. The wallet will decide for you from among all the bitcoins in the entire wallet. If you freeze (right mouse button context menu) all but one address than Electrum will only send from that address. Thanks everyone. This is incredibly helpful. So the wallet decides which address(es) to send from, unless I freeze addresses which it will then exclude.
|
|
|
Ice-Dice.com is awesome!
~at logging ip addreses^^^((((ping)))) So I tried the site. Yeah I was kind of disappointed about the payout requiring 1.5BTC worth of "gambling" (or is it paid in, I'm not sure.) So in that sense it is kind of misleading. But what I don't get is why everyone is getting their panties in a bunch about "IP logging." If this is just a front to get the IP addresses of forum users, what's the point and why care? Any site linked to here could do that, even just embedded images. Why is this such a big concern? because they log the ip address where as even if you create a new account on the same ip address they flag you and apply mathamatically impossible odds in attempt to recover the losses from the first account...also for whatever reason they churn bitcoins through the bitcoin address that they give to you which is linked to your ip address.. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) ~very strange imho I don't recall having provided them with any BTC address. I assumed they did that when you request a pay out. But maybe I am mistaken. It sounds like you have an issue with them regarding multiple accounts with the same IP address. I can't speak to that. I only tried with a single account and a single IP address. I was still disappointed. The payout scheme was not clearly spelled out and seems misleading. So yeah, I guess I had fun there for like fifteen minutes. I probably won't be going back again though.
|
|
|
Ice-Dice.com is awesome!
~at logging ip addreses^^^((((ping)))) So I tried the site. Yeah I was kind of disappointed about the payout requiring 1.5BTC worth of "gambling" (or is it paid in, I'm not sure.) So in that sense it is kind of misleading. But what I don't get is why everyone is getting their panties in a bunch about "IP logging." If this is just a front to get the IP addresses of forum users, what's the point and why care? Any site linked to here could do that, even just embedded images. Why is this such a big concern?
|
|
|
This account is over 10 years old. Has not been played in years. Many lvl 60 - lvl 70 skills. Many items in bank. See screenshots http://imgur.com/a/Zygq8Make me an offer. I'm thinking something around 0.10 BTC plus any kind of escrow service fees we can agree on. Totally willing to negotiate on price.
|
|
|
New here. I'm a bit confused by some of the rewards I am seeing in Slush's pool. Example: # Block found at Duration Total shares Your shares Your BTC reward Block # Block value Validity 20780 2013-11-09 23:11:34 2:21:41 550859564 605 0.00002566 268742 25.18185416 confirmed According to the main page (25 BTC + block fees - 2% fee) * (shares found by user's workers) / (total shares in current round)
So I have total shares 550859564, my shares 605, reward is BTC 0.00002566 but that seems low. My math gives me (25.18185416 * 0.98) * (605 / 550859564) = 0.00002710367 0.00002710367 > 0.00002566 Any idea what I am missing?
|
|
|
Is this still true?> In Settings I seem to see the smaller auto payout is 0.02 ?
|
|
|
10 please
1CNcfEX2Km3UioNQ4egEVzmVR69RPfHDaC
|
|
|
30
1CNcfEX2Km3UioNQ4egEVzmVR69RPfHDaC
|
|
|
48
1CNcfEX2Km3UioNQ4egEVzmVR69RPfHDaC
|
|
|
Super newbie here. When I download electrum and start it, it creates a wallet for me. In the "receive" tab I see a collapsible tree where the root is labeled "Main Account" and underneath it are five addresses.
I can label each address. And I was thinking of a scheme like this:
address1 "Mining account" (Will supply this address to my mining pool where asked to supply an address for collecting payment.) address2 "Public account" (Will transfer funds here when I want to spend them) address3 "Private account" (I know this cannot truly be "private" but I would transfer any funds received in either of the other two addresses to this address.)
However the electrum doc states "New addresses are generated automatically when your receiving addresses are used"
How does this work then? For instance I see forum sigs which include BTC addresses for donations or whatever. These people cannot possibly be changing their forum sig every time they receive a payment.
How "temporary" are these addresses? And because of this, would the above scheme be better off using different wallets rather than different addresses within the wallets?
The electrum doc mentions: - Seedless wallets can generate addresses to receive Bitcoins, but cannot send them. - To create a seedless wallet start Electrum, select the restore option and enter your Master Public Key instead of your seed. - You can use seedless wallets in Point Of Sale systems.
If a seedless wallet cannot send them, then what is the point?
What would be the best way to implement a scheme as the above? Use wallets for the "accounts" I want? Use addresses for the "accounts" I want? Or something else?
I cannot see where in electrum to create anything outside of this "Main Account" it calls it in the receive tab.
I guess these addresses do not make sense as accounts, given that when sending I cannot choose from which address it is sent? So I would have to use different wallets to implement the above? Thanks for any tips.
|
|
|
|