I'm stopping my test I've ran for 36 hours as the results are similar to what I had ran in January.

identical 1060 x 7 rigs
AHASHplus 0.12553203 -> 0.12687823 (difference of 0.0013462 in 36 hours).
AM with NH - 0 -> 0.00198541

I think only Ahash makes sense if you have graphics cards that excel at core dependent algorithms not offered on NH and also compared to ethash. For a 1060, ethereum mining is way ahead of pretty much any alt coin at this point in time.[/]

I'm very tempted to end this test early on account of MiningPoolHub still running about 20% behind NH.

Two days after I started the MPH vs. NH test I also started testing Zergpool which has an option to mine multiple coins with the same algo (in this case Neoscrypt) then auto-convert to BTC. This is with a single RX 570 and it is already up to 0.46253 mBTC; meanwhile the GTX 1080 mining on MPH is only at 1.07614 mBTC, despite that it can hash Neoscrypt almost twice as fast as the RX 570 and has a two day head start to boot.

The next comparison was going to be Ahashpool vs. NiceHash, but now I am thinking Ahashpool vs. Zergpool could be interesting. While it's not quite as statistically valid if the winner of one round doesn't proceed to the next, I'm not sure I have the patience/willpower to tie up a GTX 1080 for another week on NH if Zergpool shows real promise.