 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
1M version are working fine for 4 days now without any problem.
Product quality is really good, it definitively worth the money.
|
|
|
|
Ordered Chivalry : Medieval Warfare, before checking the forum.
It was exactly 24 hours ago, I haven't received the steam code yet...
It seems it still takes days, you really should update the website to match your current processing time.
I'll post here when I'll get the code, so people know how much time it takes these days.
Received my game today -> 8 days after. |
|
|
|
|
Ordered Chivalry : Medieval Warfare, before checking the forum.
It was exactly 24 hours ago, I haven't received the steam code yet...
It seems it still takes days, you really should update the website to match your current processing time.
I'll post here when I'll get the code, so people know how much time it takes these days.
|
|
|
|
Ordered 5x 60cm versions today. Figured, what the heck.. I can always lay GPUs on their side outside of my rig if too long.
What PCIe version are these? 1.1, 2.0 or 3.0? Cause bandwidth doubles in each. Most PCIe slots are 2.0 I know, but plugging into an x16 PCIe 3.0 slot should yield... PCie 3.0 bandwidth?
I ask because I also do some CUDA computations, which requires some very high bandwidth. It would double my calculations is it is x1 PCIe 3.0 over x1 PCIe 2.0.
Theses won't give you extra bandwidth nor loose some, since the PCIe controllers are in the CPU and/or the Chipset depending on the platform you're using and in the GPU card, and theses controllers will set the PCIe speed this way : the actual PCIe speed will match the lowest PCIe revision of your hardware. As USB3 wire are designed to support high bandwidth, I would expect theses risers to work well at 1x PCIe 3.0 speed. I've ordered 3 of theses 100cm length risers, I'll tell here if they works well. |
|
|
|
I think some people are blind, or someone just wont read news or look it official web. And share wrong information... Its writed 23.11.2013. on the news, and isnt scan, its writed clearly. http://www.smos-linux.org/donate/You are lying, when I downloaded the image this text was not there. And EVEN IF, this is WAY TOO HIDDEN. Information like this should be very clearly displayed next to the download link, not hidden away in some random section that nobody will ever read. And tell me, why are all the files involved hidden, why does it run at 3 AM in the morning when most people are sleeping? Can you explain that? You are a ripoff. And you have the nerve to cry here that you are not getting any donations. Shame on you, I hope you rot, you are the cancer to the community. I downloaded Smos on Nov. 20 (V1.0) and the 15 minutes donation was already in the image and properly advertised on the website update page if I remember well. It was introduced after being proposed by someone on this forum thread. By the way I have no problem with this, I think this is legit if you consider the good support he provides, plus web hosting, server bandwidth... Guys, if you want something without restriction, build it yourself and do the debug yourself... If you can't, just accept the rules. |
|
|
|
Anybody have a rough guess of how much money Phonetic ran away with?
As for now, nothing. Because i think evereyone still got their coins. But we just can`t get em out. Why on earth to do you think that? When Phonetic have been active 1 or several times after payments stopped. He knows, and he just dont want to tell us. And he wants the people who still mines for him to continue. Remember he still have a 0.4GHash miner, all for himself.. If it had been OUR doge's, we would have them in OUR account... :\ I was just pointing out that the doge is still in everyones account. When the accounts are getting empty, but no one recives their coins, then he has stolen them. But i`m not saying there is any hope for him to release the coins. We are most likely f*&%ed. You do know that he can display that we have doge in our account and yet have already taken them, you do know that right? You do know how web design works? That's right, the number of due Doges for each user is simply stored in a database, which is probably used for both the website and the pool shares management. The "real" Doges earned by the entire pool are (hopefully) still stored all together in the pool wallet. |
|
|
|
|
The last Manual Payments worked well and were almost immediately by my side. As long as I can get my Doge, I'll stay here as a primary pool.
|
|
|
|
|
Automated Payments still aren't work, I should have received mine about 30 hours ago -- nothing arrived yet.
My miners swapped to my backup pool 3 times today.
Hopefully the new servers will arrive soon.
|
|
|
|
|
I received a requested Manual Payment on 2013-12-24 12:45:00 server time, since -- nothing.
Nevertheless I should have got a Automated Payment this night which wasn't triggered at the 10.000 Doge target (I have around 16k at the moment and haven't requested a Manual Payment for now).
So Automated Payments seems still broken over-there, but mining tends to be far more stable as it was a day ago. My miners weren't pointed to a backup pool in the past 12 hours.
Also the website is definitively more responsive. That's good things at least.
So thank you Phonetic for the job done, there's still a bit to do until the new servers arrive.
Merry Christmas :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Merci du conseil, je pense que dans mon cas miner les Litecoins est bien plus rentable, puisque niveau électricité ça me revient au même.
Sans compter le chauffage ça me coute 1.5€ d’électricité pour 1 LTC miné, alors que l'achat me reviendrait actuellement à entre 3 et 8€/LTC suivant les plateformes.
|
|
|
|
|
You can count on me, better graph cards are on the way :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Bonjour à tous,
Je suis actuellement étudiant à Clermont-Ferrand en école d'Ingénieurs en Informatique.
J'ai découvert le bitcoin il y a environ un mois en discutant avec un amis, mais ne pouvant pas investir dans du matériel onéreux afin que l'opération soit rentable, je mine donc du Litecoin.
Mon matériel actuel est mon pc de jeu, la config est un peu vieille et n'est pas adaptée au minage :
i7 920
12Go RAM
2x GTX 280
Je mine donc avec cudaMiner pour la pool WeLoveLTC, ce qui me donne actuellement 35k Hash/s pour une consommation de 360 Watts, ce qui n'est pas rentable à première vue, mais me sert de chauffage "central" dans mon appartement.
Comme l'expérience est plutôt concluante du point de vu chauffage, je vais joindre l'utile à l'agréable en changeant les 2 GTX 280 par une ou deux HD 7950 qui me permettront de faire quelques bénéfices.
A bientôt,
P.
|
|
|
|
|
