 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
I have been following menlo.one their vision is very good they plan to eradicate the fake ICO's out there by creating a safe platform for ICO investors the good thing about their platform is investors can build or join the community and be rewarded for any valuable contribution they do.
|
|
|
|
|
For anyone of you that would be planning to invest in ICO's there's a new platform right now called menlo.one their concept is to create an ICO marketplace free of scams by giving the ability to community to talk about each ICO, upvote or downvote a project, and invest automatically on the platform itself.
|
|
|
|
|
Really good to hear, menlo.one will make it simplier for ICO teams to offer incentives and deals to early contributors. Simplifying and automating everything is what we really need right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice try. But I think everyone who knows to basic operation in computers knows this.
Don't want to argue with your effort, but man. This is too obvious.
|
|
|
|
Anyone asking or begging another user/merit source for meriting their posts is tagworthy. I suggest you start keeping notes on who these people are and/or report that to Lauda for their opinion on this.
AFAIK asking for merit is looked down upon.
They aren't asking directly for merit. They ask me to review their posts, and I'm ambivalent about this. How can you tell if a persion is trying to get merits, or if it is a genuine request for advice about posting? For example - How do you interpret my post about my awarding sMerit. It was intended to give me some guidelines about the general forum attitude to their use, but some may misunderstand my motives. The attitude to merit awards seems to be pretty mixed. I'll probably go my own way, but I can be influenced by good logic.  Asking and Begging wouldn't be good in any way (I'd say let them earn naturally). Don't know but I am seeing threads "trying hard" to impress Merit sources hoping to get some merits forgetting the thing called "Discussion". They will lay down facts which I think they have Googled letting the readers guess what's the discussion all about then the whole thread will became a rubbish megathread. |
|
|
|
|
Thorough researching. Don't just depend on to good to be true whitepaper, dev team, and HYIP like promises of the project.
|
|
|
|
|
I also wanted to know about this, everyone is claiming that the lightning network can solve the scalability problem of bitcoin. So my guess would be it is just for BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
The name itself suggest that this is a shady ICO and not a good investment to make. Watch out guys.
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the blind investors of BCC will actually invest again on BCCX. Based on their website they have raised at least 11M of supply as of today on their ICO. People keep believing on things which they have been fooled before.
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on your decision just like others say. No matter when you will buy ETH it will still be profitable, BTC and ETH have the same importance in cryptocurrency so they both have future in the long run.
|
|
|
|
|
How come people are still believing this shitcoin? They have already failed there investors by closing the Lending Platform which they are known about. And now, they are trying to convince people to believe on them again?
|
|
|
|
I think recovery process already started, but full recovery and stabilization will be by the end of February.
Yeah, its already recovering I hope this recovery will not be stopped just like what happened in the first week of January when the price was entering the 17K level. |
|
|
|
|
It is only a matter of time. The bitcoin's price will surely recover as you wake up tomorrow you will see that the price will be back to green again. I still have faith in bitcoin's power.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess this discussion has gone to "what my country can offer but your country cannot". Its true some of the countries in the world is still developing but we cannot blame them for that reason.
|
|
|
|
There are still many parts of the world, including stores, taxis, but also people with smartphones, that do not have Internet. It is doubtful that even in the long-term future everyone is going to have internet on their smartphone. So how is bitcoin going to work for retail transactions? Imagine a store without public wifi. Can transactions be processed if only the vendor has Wifi?
Credit cards can work on either a phone line or internet, so it would be ubiquitous as opposed to bitcoin which cannot work on a phone line?
FYI. Internet travels through a "phone line" or can be broadcasted through tower and cellsite. Though I agree the access of internet is a main reason why cryptocurrency cannot fully be adopted as terms of use. Its the option of the store with phone lines not to install a wifi. |
|
|
|
|
Aren't you guys tired of this too many shitposters? Don't even bother to read what thread starter was talking to. Just replying any comments that they can say. What would you guys do? Do you think it should be stopped or just follow the trend?
*Take note: Sometimes, they even don't know how to construct a decent sentence. WTF
|
|
|
|
|
Told my friend about this and he replied this was just a pyramiding scheme, and will probably burst anytime. I feel bad for him because our financial standing (me and him) had changed. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
