 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
GMiner v1.46 available for download
v1.46
+ added ZelCash Equihash 125,4 algorithm for Nvidia cards
is there an algorithm change on ZelCash? for now its the 144,5 Equihash algo. |
|
|
|
[...]The speeds are almost exactly the same as I was getting with lolminer.[...] you mean like about 1% off?  the non alpha versions of lolminer had also watchdog, perhaps its again in the 0.7 release. |
|
|
|
Any plans on 1060 3gb support for 150,5?
This algo use 4300mb on GPU. Its imbossible. thats not entirely true, lollidieb (the developer of the official miner) released an openCL version, that is capable of mining with 3GB memory. saw it somewhere in the discord channel some days ago and tried it with some of my HD7970/280x not much hashrate (2,5-5 sol/s), but it works and some people confirmed running it with nvidia cards. Edit: found it |
|
|
|
U have the profit man. we dont.yet:) so your work is like for nothing now
what is wrong with some people, i dont know what your profession is, but how about you work a month or so for free? and why you're expecting developers should charge less or no fee on their products? i am very happy, that lolliedieb is not charging like 5-10%, i certently would have (with a big FU to all), because this miner is like a monopol on some algorithms for amd cards. he doesnt need to justify what ever fee he is charging. @ lolliedieb Du musst dich vor keinem rechtfertigen, da verplemperst evtl zuviel Zeit, achte lieber auf Bug-Reports da haben wir alle mehr von  Bis jetzt machst nen super Job, weiter so! |
|
|
|
onlolminer 0.6 alpha 4 , 4gpu or more becomes more of a incorect share 6 gpu =  5 gpu =  3 gpu =  2 gpu =  any solution? my solution is to mine with the lolminer 0.6 alpha 3 |
|
|
|
0.6 alpha 4 runs great at 2 or 4 GPU rigs, thanks  but 6 x R9 200 rig is producing lots of not accepted shares (Aion), so I moved it back to 0.5. EDIT: Running 3 + 3 GPU-s solved that not accepted shares problem. +1 144/5 and 192/7 for me too, but not only 200 series, the 300 also. going back to alpha 3 alpha3 says "alpha2" in the web api though  |
|
|
|
I guess 1080 232 sol/s 580 143 sol/s.  |
|
|
|
hi, here again a test with my old amd cards with the lolMiner 0.6 alpha1, mining anon on 144_5 algo. the most improvement i got on the old tahiti's ~30-35%, the hawaii (290x / 390x) cards improved about 15-20% here some "snapshot" numbers after 90 sec of hashing, (3,5,7,9) are tahiti (7970 / 280x) cards. Device ID Sol/s new Sol/s old Improvement
0 35,2 29,9 1,177257525
1 33,8 28,4 1,190140845
2 34,9 29,6 1,179054054
3 25,3 18,9 1,338624339
4 35,1 28,3 1,240282686
5 24,9 18,6 1,338709677
6 34,4 28,4 1,211267606
7 26,1 19,8 1,318181818
8 36,3 31,3 1,159744409
9 26,5 19,9 1,331658291
so about 25% bump overall, big thx for your work. thats not all, its a small sample size, but holy f*** you're beating the current EWBF_ miner (0.6) hashrate on my desktop NVidia card (same OC settings)  lolMiner 0.6 alpha is currently peaking at about 92 sol/s: 1080ti with OC settings: +100 core, +600 mem, 100 PL -> 86-90 sol/s Average speed (20s): 89.8 sol/s Average speed (20s): 88.6 sol/s Average speed (20s): 88.2 sol/s Average speed (20s): 89.2 sol/s Submitting share Share accepted --------------------------------------------- Average speed (90s): 89.1 sol/s --------------------------------------------- vs EWBF_'s miner, where i'm getting around 79-84 sol/s i have to look at the longruns and see how stable the alpha version is for now. thanks again! |
|
|
|
@toyo87 are you seriously trying to mine with a GeForce 940M? As far as i know its a mobile GPU and its always a bad idea to mine on a laptop xD. And i also don't think that lolliedieb (or any other mining coder) should consider to try to include such GPU's that said, i will try to run the lolminer on this coin and check if it mines, as soon as i find out how to get a wallet and stuff edit: +---------------------------------------------------------+
| _ _ __ __ _ ___ ____ |
| | | ___ | | \/ (_)_ __ ___ _ __ / _ \ | ___| |
| | |/ _ \| | |\/| | | '_ \ / _ \ '__| | | | ||___ \ |
| | | (_) | | | | | | | | | __/ | | |_| | ___) | |
| |_|\___/|_|_| |_|_|_| |_|\___|_| \___(_)____/ |
| |
| This software is for pool mining |
| with the Equihash 96/5, 210/9 |
| 144/5 or 192/7 algorithm |
| |
| Made by Lolliedieb, September 2018 |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
lolMiner is configured to mine Genesis(GENX), Equihash 192/7
Setup Miner...
Using device with id 0 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti)
Connecting to pool...
Connected to genx-eu.nibirupool.com:8120
Subscribed to stratum server
New target received: 0010000000000000
New job received: 14216
Authorized worker: ScvyshngcYSmSzHSnXRzfsdAgyD12rGeFV.Desk
Start Mining...
New job received: 14217
Average speed (20s): 33.6 sol/s
Average speed (20s): 31.6 sol/s
New job received: 14218
Average speed (20s): 33.2 sol/s
Average speed (20s): 33.5 sol/s
---------------------------------------------
Average speed (90s): 33.0 sol/s
---------------------------------------------
Average speed (20s): 31.8 sol/s
New job received: 14219
Average speed (20s): 34.3 sol/s
Average speed (20s): 32.8 sol/s so tried to mine with lolMiner, seems to work just fine. But i would still recommend the EWBF miner for Nvidia cards, for this algo i'm getting about 6 sol/s more with the same OC settings. I think the EWBF miner utilizes somehow more memory, the "Memory Controller Load" section of GPUZ shows about 20% less load with the lolMiner. |
|
|
|
Thank you for the update Lolliedieb! Here the stats from a short term test with old cards (all with tweaked memory timings): I've got like 20% more hashrate with my 290x/390x (Hawaii), they were at 22-26 sol/s before. Sadly there is only like 5-10% gain (~1-2 sol/s improvement) on the even older 7970/289x (Tahiti) cards, but they still doing their job now at 18-20 sol/s Average speed (90s): 30.5 sol/s | 29.5 sol/s | 31.2 sol/s | 20.0 sol/s | 28.6 sol/s | 19.1 sol/s | 28.9 sol/s | 19.8 sol/s | 31.1 sol/s | 18.6 sol/s Total: 257.4 sol/s I also did try this miner with a 1080 ti but EWBF's miner is still better (same OC settings): ~62 sol/s vs. ~70 sol/s So good job Hope the stabilty is still as good as before (or better). I still haven't figured out how to set the api port, tryed command line and the json file (default and coin section). Can you give an json example on how to use it? |
|
|
|
"EXAMPLE_ANON" :
{
"COIN" : "ANON",
"POOLS" : [
{"POOL" : "ANON.suprnova.cc",
"PORT" : "7060",
"USER" : "myanonimous.banic",
"PASS" : "x"}
u mean here ? at "coin" change to auto?
or where to put auto? @bat file
here an example "EXAMPLE5" : { "COIN" : "AUTO144", "POOLS" : [ {"POOL" : "anon.2miners.com", "PORT" : "9090", "USER" : "Anc6H2Yftmqb7Yf7ZJsUJEbikcHyRxsjuZr.RIG_ID", "PASS" : "x"} ] } |
|
|
|
Hi dev please add "ANON" Equihash 144,5 Thanks I will do with 0.5 that we will see within next 10 days. But honestly: there are at the moment only 3 or 4 mining softwares out there supporting Equihash 144/5 and you do not start or fork a coin within 5 days. Why I hear of this project now and no dev tried before if all mining software is compatible? I would not trust such a team... When version 0.5, I wish for better Equihash 96.5 (Minexcoin) hashrate, I know you can do it.
Maybe look at other miners and how they done the tweaks.
Please keep project alive and well, don't wish for another miner gone bust
Yes, all algorithms for all cards will get a speedup. AMD cards on MNX about 10%, Nvidia slightly more, but there the 0.4x series was pretty bad. I hope to catch up to EWBF For the 144/5 coins that already works, just use coin=AUTO144 ... the format suprnova uses for this is same as for zergpool. I will add this option for 192/7 next version. This coin is a fork of BTC and ZCL like bitcoin private, called anonymous bitcoin. the anouncement was in may: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3822523.0The actual fork was on september 10. Mining works with lolMiner just use the "coin=AUTO144" option. curently mining it myself. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone, did some testing today with old cards (hawaii and tahiti). Modded bios on every card (mem timings), slightly overclocked, some cards underperform, due to the lack of good memory timings. 60s avarage speeds hawaii devices (0,1,3,5,7,8) tahiti devices (2,4,6,9) device 0: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
290X Sapphire 4GB (1040 MHz / 1400 MHz)
usage: core 100% / mem controller 30%
24.7 - 25.9 Sol/s ~115W
device 1: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390 Series
390X Asus 8GB (1040 MHz / 1500 MHz)
usage: core 100% / mem controller 30%
25.9 - 27.6 Sol/s ~115W
device 2: AMD Radeon R9 200 / HD 7900 Series
HD 7970 Gigabyte 3GB (1050 MHz / 1400 MHz)
usage: core 99% / mem controller ? (that's normal for tahiti cards gpuz readings)
18.6 - 19.6 Sol/s ?
device 3: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
290X Sapphire 8GB (1040 MHz / 1500 MHz)
usage: core 100% / mem controller 30%
22.8 - 23.2 Sol/s ~185W
device 4: AMD Radeon R9 200 / HD 7900 Series
HD 7970 Gigabyte 3GB (1050 MHz / 1400 MHz)
usage: core 99% / mem controller ?
18.4 - 19.4 Sol/s ?
device 5: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
290X Sapphire 4GB (1080 MHz / 1400 MHz)
usage: core 100% / mem controller 30%
24.0 - 24.7 Sol/s ~135W
device 6: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
280X HiS 3GB (1050 MHz / 1500 MHz)
usage: core 98% / mem controller ?
19.1 - 19.6 Sol/s ?
device 7: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
290X MSI 4GB (1030 MHz / 1400 MHz)
usage: core 100% / mem controller 30%
21.1 - 22.5 Sol/s ~160W
device 8: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390 Series
390X Sapphire 8GB (1080 MHz / 1500 MHz)
usage: core 100% / mem controller 30%
26.0 - 27.5 Sol/s ~170W
device 9: AMD Radeon R9 200 / HD 7900 Series
HD 7970 Gigabyte 3GB (1050 MHz / 1400 MHz)
usage: core 99% / mem controller ?
18.5 - 19.7 Sol/s ? So overall performance is not bad, but i think there is some potential for improvement. Comparing the old equihash 200,9 hashrates from those cards to a nvidia 1080ti with zhash hashrates (only comparison i can get first hand) we get 400Sol/s from a 390X vs 780Sol/s from a 1080ti. When mining Zhash, we get: 27 Sol/s vs 70 Sol/s for now, mining ethhash would be like 30Mh/s vs 52Mh/s. So the difference between the two cards would be somewhere like < 1:2. I think there are some other algo's with a similar factor between the two cards, so if there is not more potential for like 5-10Sol/s i would be sad. But for now great work Lolliedieb! Thats my feedback for old AMD cards (they have still juice ), running longterm test with these 10 cards now. |
|
|
|
Welcome back Lolliedieb, hope your vacation was both fun and restful.
Your version 0.41 has been running on my Ubuntu 18 rig (HEPTA) without fail for days, now. Undervolted two Vega 54's (to 90w) and two RX 570's (to 80w)
Average speed (5s): 15.4 sol/s | 21.2 sol/s | 9.6 sol/s | 10.0 sol/s Total: 56.2 sol/s
Average speed (5s): 22.2 sol/s | 18.8 sol/s | 10.2 sol/s | 11.4 sol/s Total: 62.6 sol/s
Average speed (5s): 16.6 sol/s | 19.6 sol/s | 9.2 sol/s | 11.6 sol/s Total: 57.0 sol/s
Average speed (5s): 17.0 sol/s | 19.4 sol/s | 10.2 sol/s | 9.6 sol/s Total: 56.2 sol/s
Average speed (5s): 16.2 sol/s | 18.2 sol/s | 12.2 sol/s | 9.6 sol/s Total: 56.2 sol/s
---------------------------------------------
Average speed (60s): 17.5 sol/s | 18.5 sol/s | 10.0 sol/s | 10.7 sol/s Total: 56.8 sol/s
---------------------------------------------
I'm looking forward to any performance improvements you can make, though. Good luck!
my one and only 1080ti is making 70 sol/s @250W with EWBF  waiting for improvements on AMD (i have a mixed tahiti/hawaii 10 GPU rig) |
|
|
|
fukanoshi call his miner as a fastest one, anyone checked already ewbf VS fukanoshi?
funakoshi vs ewbf: tried on a 1080 ti, same OC settings, same pool, same coin (btcz) funakoshi 59-61 sol/s ewbf 69-71 sol/s |
|
|
|
Am i the only one so far that dont have any kind of improvment with 0.3 version speed wise,on 144.5 algo my 1080tis are doing 55-60 sols wich is the same speed that they had on previous version...Am i missing out something or boost is for 1060/70 cards?
I also have 0 improvement on my 1080ti, so perhaps with the next version |
|
|
|
|
@bmxakias
the BitcoinZ algo 144_5
thank you for the update EWBF_
now i'm getting on a 1080ti with 100% PL, +100 Core, +400 Mem about 58-60 Sol/s
for now no rejected shares, have to test it for stability over night
|
|
|
|
tested today the new miner on a 1080ti, I'm getting ~50 Sol/s with following settings: 80% PL, +100 Core, -500 Mem tried with +400 Mem -> doesn't change anything. at more than +100 MHz Core Clock my card gets unstable, i think others can overclock their cards even more and finaly the Powerlimit is "automaticaly" set, if i set it to 100% GPU-Z shows that the card uses only about 80% TDP @EWBF_ would be nice if you could look at the intensity settings. (for those who mine on their desktops ) on the new miner intensity does nothing (or to little) with the 0.3.4b version i can watch videos with intensity 8 (GPU Load 97%) edit: yeah some people mentioned intensity |
|
|
|
Ok I'm ready to burn my computer. Someone please help me. I have a R280X that runs Cryptonite at 485h/s and according to the charts should run Equihash around 290 h/s. I'm running claymore 12.6 on Slushpool and when the miner starts it does 275h/s. It then begins to throttle down in steps down to 145 h/s and sometimes lower. I recently watch it go as low as 40 h/s before climbing back up to 145 h/s.
Does anybody know why the rates are so low, and also the -i and -il commands do nothing to the hashrate.
I'm running the "blockchain" drivers but had the same problem when running AMD 15.2.
Any ideas?
Bob
Which GPU is this exactly? Most likely your fans are dead or dying and your GPU is throttling. Then why does it run full guns 485 h/s when mining cryptonite ? no problem there...only problem is equihash and claymore 12.6 What Is the make and model of your 280x ? Try using the older 15.12 drivers and set clock to 1050/1500 or so. I have a few 7970 (280X), I run them at 950 mV, 900/1250MHz, quite stable. I am also running a few 7970 aka 280x, @1050/1400 1110-1150mV (depends on the specific card) and making with a modded BIOS ~300+ Sol per card. If the -i setting does nothing, then something is wrong on your side, mine 280x' run stable with i 4. |
|
|
|
I would love to buy some snowgem right now but it still has not been listed yet. Has anyone willing to make deal with me? I have just need only 50 snowge.
if the prise is right a deal could be done, just activate 'allow messages from newbees'. |
|
|
|
|
