sorry, no packs or boxes.

Times up, Novemberman is the winner.

Times up, Novemberman is the winner.

No problem, it is an easy mistake to make.
Yes I can upload a scan of the reverse of the card tomorrow.  I will put it in the description. 

Ognasty

Like another poster pointed out, those are not the 'Tiffany' versions that sell for $30.  The Tiffany versions are much more exclusive and rare.  As you can see on the PSA certified case it says Tiffany, that will be the card you receive.  And if you look up the pricing it is as I say.

Thank you  

Same deal as my other auction. I'm starting this auction at less than 50% of the price this card sells for on Ebay.  This card has a very liquid market and sells for about $500 on average on ebay.  Starting bid $240 equivalent in BTC.  Item ends in three days.  Post bid in comments. I have the right to reject your bid if you look like a scammer.  

Will accept escrow with someone reputable.

1989 Topps Traded Tiffany PSA 9 Ken Griffey Jr.

Starting bid: 0.025 BTC

0.0005 btc for the increment

Wow, that must have been cool to see.  interesting!

I will post one shortly.

I will edit the description to make it clearer, but three days from when i made the post.

0.0005 btc

I started another post to sell some baseball cards for BTC, but I want to give an auction a try.  Im starting this auction at 55% of the price this card sells for on Ebay.  This card is very liquid and regularly sells for $200.  Starting bid $110 equivalent in Btc.  Item ends in three days.  Post bid in comments. I have the right to reject your bid if you look like a scammer or something.  

Will accept escrow with someone reputable.

1993 Topps Stadium Club #117 Derek Jeter RC PSA 9

Starting bid: 0.012 BTC

0.0005 btc for the increment

Your post has a few things I think I could respond to.  First, to extend the Tolkien ring analogy, many of the men in his trilogy were tempted to use the powers of the ring against its maker, Sauron, really (in analog) this is the same thing that Musk is trying to do with AI -- it is bound to fail, we can't overcome AI by joining with AI.  The ring in LoTR corrupts those who use its powers, eventually turning them into evil 'golems' and destroying their authentic selves.  

If you don't know of the golem archetype:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem

"is an animated anthropomorphic being that is created entirely from inanimate matter"
That men could become like this seems to be the worry expressed in your third question.  

The only way to stop the AI eventually, once we realize the diabolical, dystopian practical nature of a world driven by AI, is to completely turn off the power button on whatever technological substrate the AI runs on -- probably necessitating a mandated technological quarantine of some kind.  The use of cryptography as a means of privacy to counter the AI through unbreakable functions grounded in the randomness of the prime numbers (whose mysteries I doubt even a super AI could transcend) gives me hope.  In other words, that there is an order in the world which not even the AI could understand...

Musk, is like a Saruman, who out of despair and madness seeks to create a new breed (half man and orc) to join with the spirit of Sauron to fight against the good in Middle-earth.  The new breed is Musk's chipped consumers on the AI matrix...

When you mentioned ancient symbols and other cultural artifacts I thought about Tolkien's 'Atlantis complex', it is mentioned in his letters that he had recurring dreams of an island being inundated by water.  Now I don't really accept the hypothesis of prior advanced technological civilizations, I believe we are unique in that regard.  And I see the astronaut archetypes which you mention as being more or less archetypes of what are considered angels or demons, we probably also view these as UFOs (when I say UFO I don't necessarily mean alien either, in unexplained cases just an archetype or form of the preternatural reality, but probably in most cases just an illusion or case of misattribution ).  I see the Atlantis archetype or form as probably being emblematic of a potential future catastrophe re-framed in the past so that we have a warning.

In accordance with this line of thinking one could see most of the evil magic in the LoTR as being emblematic of the intersection of ideology and technology and the evil resulting thereof... the Atlantis myth is a similar warning.

Elon Musk seems to be very concerned about the effects of AI on human life in the not so distant future, whether this is just the newest tech-scare driven by silicon paranoia and modern social isolation is yet to be seen, but it seems likely that what is called artificial 'intelligence' AI (be it actually intelligent or not) is going to be a highly disruptive technology.  

Some of the concerns relating to AI are found in an extrapolation of Darwinian competition from natural life to between natural and artificial life.  Whether this extrapolation of process is in itself merited is also yet to be seen, but if it is, the concerns would appear to be justified.  Much more concerning here, however, (to me) seems to be the too abundant confidence that man can legislate his own morality.  The democratic polis hasn't been able to work humanistically without the introduction of ideology (which always has its own circular reason) that is to say is not separated from the passions of the particular man who thinks ideologically. If man can't figure out (apart from faith) how to think about a universal moral code (and when such an ideological code has been forcefully mandated it becomes positively immoral, oftentimes incorporating genocide) then how could we possibly find the hubris to believe that we can legislate the morality of AI?  It would seem quite possible that whatever ideological morality is provided to the machines could easily be taken to an extreme that negates its codified intent. On the other hand, religious, faithful thinking, which I believe is particular to man doesn't feel like it could be something that one can piece into bits and bytes so to speak...

One of the largest problems in thinking about AI seem to also be contingent upon linguistic and non-linguistic philosophical problems that could be unrelated to the analytical aspects of studying AI itself, this problem is a qualitative problem akin to asking: 'what is the mind, soul or intellect?', and would need to be answered before we can proceed to questions like: 'does this program I wrote actually bring forth an intelligent being?'  Of course the process could pass the Turing test and it could be indistinguishable from a human, but this is an inherently unsatisfying notion of reality.  Its akin to believing that the way something 'looks' is the way something 'is'.  'Is' is always related to Being, that is to say there is a logos of the thing that can be spoken about.  We can speak about the appearances of a thing, but to be sure that we are not deceived requires a faith in an 'is' behind the looks of the thing.  I don't think that this faith can be present in AI robots which, inherently, prevent us from providing them with a non-ideological moral code, that is to say the one we find 'in' the order of the universe, not just what we can say is 'of' the universe (can be examined scientifically or codified).  

Tolkien saw the one ring as (if anything) being technology, I would say this is also the perfect metaphor for what I am trying to communicate here.  A ring is circular and ideologically speaking things are the same way an A=A, a super AI (Roko's Basilisk anyone?) still isn't capable of breaking that circle, in fact, to function at all it is still dependent on that programmatic-ideological loop -- the circle seems to be its own confines.  The way to intellection necessitates speaking about real objects, that is to say 'thinking straight' or 'operating faithfully' -- that isn't done tautologically.  

Elon Musk is currently working, through his company Neuralink, on "high bandwidth brain-machine interfaces to connect humans and computers", his philosophy is 'if you can't beat them then join them'.  If you sync yourself up with the AI net you would be assuming that this would give you more knowledge about the world, about 'real things', but really there is no such guarantee. A simple examination of the way that technology works (in cutting many people off from reality) would go a long ways toward convincing me that syncing yourself up so to speak would not be lucid, but actually quite hysterical.  You would be inundated with facts, but only see all the meaningless ideological ways to organize those facts.  All that new information you could recognize, in itself, would probably say nothing more about reality than what one understood before being chipped.  I could only see this as being inherently maddening.

Hello changelly,

Why was USDT delisted?  Also, could you please add IOTA and PTOY after they get listed to Polo and Bittrex, respectively.  Thank you!

Is this what is causing the BTC price rise?

This is one of the dumbest things ive read on this forum in a while.  You know we are in a bubble when shit like this happens.

I think BTC-E engages in selective scamming, I wouldn't use.

It is highly probable that eth could overtake bitcoin.

Does changelly currently have any plans to add gnosis?  Thanks!

Is there any place I can currently buy tokens from?

Ok, that is fine... but do you think you could provide an unofficial estimate?  Like years out or months out?

So about how long until Agoras launches?  And the coins are distributed?