I love the concept.
The only thing that worries me is an architecture that is based on EVM. How much does this make the project dependent on development of Ethereum?
Thinking about business, it's never very good to depend on the development on a competitor and VITE is a competitor of Ethereum.
Can someone from the team give some feedback on this?
Vite also has a virtual machine, however, we are very different from Ethereum. First, we have a asynchronous architecture, whereas Ethereum is synchronous. Second, we use DPoS algorithm, which is very different to Ethereum's proof of work but more similar to EOS. Our smart contract programming language is called solidity++, which is 90% competible with solidity. The resaon of having solidity++ is Ethereum has the biggest developer community. We want to eliminate barriers for developing Dapps on Vite. thanks for the answer. what troubles me is that if Ethereum decides to change something in their EVM or solidity and you want to be compatible then you need to change things too that may not be possible etc. being compatible is quite tricky with fast moving projects. The meaning of Vite VM is compatible with EVM is, solidity ++ shares the same syntax with solidity. On programming level, it is easier to develop in solidity ++ if you know how to develop in solidity. However, the asynchronous architecture makes Vite VM very different to EVM on infrastructure level. That means, Vite can still decide to change or not when solidity is updated. But it's unlikely to happen that solidity changes its whole syntax. Besides, we acknowledge that solidity is not very well developed. Ethereum is developing Ewasm to be an alternative of solidity. Vite Labs is also doing research on that. Just like what you said, projects are moving so fast. So there will be new solutions to solve old problems, instead of old problems solving themselves. you seem to be part of the team. I couldn't find target tps for the project. do you plan to use the mainchain for everything or scalability through sidechains? |
|
|
|
|
anybody willing to sell me OTC and with escrow ? pm
|
|
|
|
I love the concept.
The only thing that worries me is an architecture that is based on EVM. How much does this make the project dependent on development of Ethereum?
Thinking about business, it's never very good to depend on the development on a competitor and VITE is a competitor of Ethereum.
Can someone from the team give some feedback on this?
Vite also has a virtual machine, however, we are very different from Ethereum. First, we have a asynchronous architecture, whereas Ethereum is synchronous. Second, we use DPoS algorithm, which is very different to Ethereum's proof of work but more similar to EOS. Our smart contract programming language is called solidity++, which is 90% competible with solidity. The resaon of having solidity++ is Ethereum has the biggest developer community. We want to eliminate barriers for developing Dapps on Vite. thanks for the answer. what troubles me is that if Ethereum decides to change something in their EVM or solidity and you want to be compatible then you need to change things too that may not be possible etc. being compatible is quite tricky with fast moving projects. |
|
|
|
|
I love the concept.
The only thing that worries me is an architecture that is based on EVM. How much does this make the project dependent on development of Ethereum?
Thinking about business, it's never very good to depend on the development on a competitor and VITE is a competitor of Ethereum.
Can someone from the team give some feedback on this?
|
|
|
|
|
the problem with all these ANNs is that there is zero innovation. You get zerocoin, you get RingCT you get Bitcoin Core and you bundle it again. You put moderators and "guarantors" good names who will rape mine the coin and then pump and dump it and voila.
Privacy? Monero. Or any of the other numerous zerocoin implementations like Zcoin PivX etc.
If every developer didn't try to get rich but instead good developers worked together we would have a much better ecosystem. Don't reinvent the wheel a hundred times over.
|
|
|
|
I don't understand. What is the problem you are solving? How can this ever be cheaper that S3 itself? If the problem is centralization, do you think that Amazon could *not* censor this platform if it's running on top of their services?  |
|
|
|
The past behavior patterns tell me they got nothing! Whenever they had the slightest news they would announce it as some "BIG NEWS" and not hold back on any hint of what geniuses they are and wink on how you should buy heat immediately! (Just remember their ABN Amro hype, where is it now?)  Oh and don't expect them to have learned from their past mistakes(aka fraudulent intent actions), these guys don't learn, they have proven that countless times in the past. These guys have lost all sort of trust! As a closed source software company trust is crucial. Exactly the opposite of what blockchain technology is trying to solve. Good thing they are not working in the blockchain tech industry... oh wait!  Without Cryptopia does the HEAT team plan another exchange beyond its own?
It's possible we have another one soonish. Transaltion: It is very likely we will not have another exchange any time soon or ever. If that had volume the HEAT exchange could be enough.
Increased volume is in the works through various means proven effective Transaltion: We do the same shit we did before that has proven to be useless and has led us to where we are now. If you expect the 2 years ago promised buy support from us then you sir are and idiot! Hahahaha I just noticed there is the wink to buy heat xD FYI: If they would be a stock company this behavior would be highly illegal and it maybe is even for small shits like them. Advice to everyone still holding heat:  There are many things to be said about this project but it's quite strange to me that people demand from a DEX to be listed to a centralized exchange. Now that the DEX sucks and development tanked etc etc are valid but not getting listed is not! |
|
|
|
|
let me see if I get this correctly: loyalty points are usually for discounts. this project as I understood the concept is:
shop owner has an offer if you buy 2. You buy 1 that you want and get the other one in IOU because there is an offer. Later either you redeem it for the item or sell it to someone else on the platform.
is that correct?
what is the difference with GroupOn then?
|
|
|
|
All coin are already mined or people could still mine? how to get some coin we do have to buy from dev?
All coins are in my hands (92%) and in the hands of Zerocracy (8%) at the moment. Only 130,000 zolds were issued and distributed. The rest is still on hold. and who decides when the rest is going to be issued and distributed? |
|
|
|
let me understand this. With the supply that is premined and your fixed rate there is an implied market cap of 1.75Billion USD right? So anyone that is buying is buying an unknown coin with a market cap bigger than Tron to put it in perspective. Where is my mistake here |
|
|
|
Yes but why put a deadline before the project becomes known or there is a mainnet? At least let the scammed people claim while people are buying like whoever does it first. Even a community vote could be an option. |
|
|
|
hi, I read a reddit post about this. I have been waiting for someone to complete the idea of the scam project Stone that I contributed to. I read there was a period to claim some community fund. Did I miss it? I provably contributed quite much on Stone  Is there still the possibility? Where to msg? I feel now I have double fucked up (and the rest of the 47% that didn't claim) because not only I was scammed but also I missed out on this claim. I really feel bad now. Why don't let it run a bit longer?  |
|
|
|
|
convince me to participate in the ICO.
the utility of the token is not like the other exchanges. Binance and Kucoin burn their tokens as a buyback for each quarter distributing profits.
are you going to do this? how often? where is the commitment?
|
|
|
|
this is the first non-scam project that obliterated my investment competely (-95% in BTC terms)  fuck this I am even running a node. I don't care. Just can you make the world know that this is a DEX and it exists? It's the most undervalued DEX right now. DEX projects with mockups only start with $30M valuation. |
|
|
|
what a terrible decline in price. lost over 50% of its value in 2 months. pathetic.
 have you seen the state of the markets? considering i made a hefty profit then yeah, i have. always the noobs that have made profits during a bear market lmfao. haha I wanted to make the same comment and you took it from my mouth it's an easy game after all!! |
|
|
|
|
the thing that everyone should understand is that these are startups without needing to make an ICO. They are not protocols or coins they are just an Ethereum use case without the need of a token. So that's why the price tanked and all prices of all ICOs that don't need a blockchain or don't need their own token will tank. Just find out the good protocol and technical innovations and buy those ICOs.
|
|
|
|
|
@C-CEX YOU CAN SEE 3 PEOPLE IN THE LAST PAGE COMPLAINING ABOUT LOCKED OUT DISABLED ACCOUNTS. WILL YOU DO SOMETHING OR SHOULD WE GO DIRECTLY TO THE POLICE?
|
|
|
|
|
@ccex since you are online:
there are a number of users me included that are not able to login. I have funds on the site and I didn't login for a long time. I cannot receive any password reset (why would I need it I never changed my password). It doesn't go to spam and the support ticket was an empty reply to see the faq.
probably there is some kind of issue with email delivery. So how can I login ? My account is deactivated or disabled? Can I pm you?
|
|
|
|
|
So I had an account. I can't log in any more. Password retrieval doesn't work and not in spam. Support ticket queue either sent me to the FAQ or now says too many tickets.
How can I access my account please.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
